ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04079868

Models of Primary Osteoporosis Screening in Male Veterans

NCT04079868, Not applicable, Completed, VA Office of Research and Development; results first posted 2025-10-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Models of Primary Osteoporosis Screening in Male Veterans. Trials, record NCT04079868. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04079868

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Models of Primary Osteoporosis Screening in Male Veterans
NCT number
NCT04079868
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
3,512 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Conditions
Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, Osteoporotic Fracture
Interventions
Bone Health Service Model
First posted
2019-09-06
Last updated
2025-10-14
Results first posted
2025-10-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Participants Screened for Osteoporosisthrough study completion, an average of 1.5 years
Proportion of men who received DXA screening for for osteoporosis. Numerator is the number of men with a completed screening DXA, denominator is all patients meeting current osteoporosis screening criteria
PrimaryBone Mineral Density T-score at the Femoral Neck2 years after the primary care team's start date
Bone mineral density in gm/cm2 as measured by DXA, converted to T-score by the densitometer manufacturer. The T score reflects the number of standard deviations away from the mean bone density of young healthy women as defined in the National Health and Nutrition Survey. Lower T-scores reflect worse bone density, and T-scores \<= -1 are consistent with osteopenia or osteoporosis. This outcome was measured in a random subset of enrolled patients (target n=25 per primary care team), regardless of whether or not they had undergone osteoporosis screening during the study period.
SecondaryGastrointestinal Medication Prescriptionsthrough study completion, an average of 1.5 years
This is a measure of potential harm from osteoporosis treatment. Numerator is number of men with new prescription for proton pump inhibitor or H2 blocker, denominator is all men eligible for osteoporosis screening
SecondaryOsteoporosis Medication Adherence (Proportion of Days Covered)through study completion, an average of 1.5 years
For patients started on osteoporosis medications, numerator is the total number of dispensed units, denominator is the number of days between the first medication prescription and medication discontinuation, death, or end of the study period
SecondaryProportion of Patients Initiating Osteoporosis Medication (%)through study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsNumerator is number of patients prescribed osteoporosis medications, denominator is number of patients eligible for osteoporosis medications based on their DXA results
SecondaryOsteoporosis Medication Persistence (Days)through study completion, up to 2 yearsAmong participants who were prescribed an osteoporosis medication, the mean number of days between the first dispensing date until a gap in medication prescription of \>=90 days occurred
SecondaryProportion With Fracturesthrough study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsNumerator is number of men with a confirmed fracture during study follow-up, denominator is all men eligible for osteoporosis screening at baseline

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Participants Screened for Osteoporosisthrough study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsparticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYBone Mineral Density T-score at the Femoral Neck2 years after the primary care team's start dateT score femoral neckMEAN
SECONDARYGastrointestinal Medication Prescriptionsthrough study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYOsteoporosis Medication Adherence (Proportion of Days Covered)through study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsproportion of days covered by medsMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Initiating Osteoporosis Medication (%)through study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYOsteoporosis Medication Persistence (Days)through study completion, up to 2 yearsdaysMEAN
SECONDARYProportion With Fracturesthrough study completion, an average of 1.5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Participants Screened for OsteoporosisBone Health Service Arm830participants
Proportion of Participants Screened for OsteoporosisUsual Care (Control) Arm33participants
Bone Mineral Density T-score at the Femoral NeckBone Health Service Arm-0.55Standard Deviation 1.28T score femoral neck
Bone Mineral Density T-score at the Femoral NeckUsual Care (Control) Arm-0.70Standard Deviation 1.25T score femoral neck
Gastrointestinal Medication PrescriptionsBone Health Service Arm562Participants
Gastrointestinal Medication PrescriptionsUsual Care (Control) Arm473Participants
Osteoporosis Medication Adherence (Proportion of Days Covered)Bone Health Service Arm0.92Standard Deviation 0.24proportion of days covered by meds
Osteoporosis Medication Adherence (Proportion of Days Covered)Usual Care (Control) Arm1.0Standard Deviation 0.13proportion of days covered by meds
Proportion of Patients Initiating Osteoporosis Medication (%)Bone Health Service Arm113Participants
Proportion of Patients Initiating Osteoporosis Medication (%)Usual Care (Control) Arm4Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBone Health Service Arm1,88820
Overall StudySTARTEDUsual Care (Control) Arm1,62419
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBone Health Service Arm1,68818
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDUsual Care (Control) Arm1,42417
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBone Health Service Arm2002
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDUsual Care (Control) Arm2002

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDrug interactionEndocrine disordersBone Health Service Arm11,688
otherDrug interactionEndocrine disordersUsual Care (Control) Arm01,424

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBone Health Service Arm1351,688
Total, all-cause mortalityUsual Care (Control) Arm891,424
Total, other adverse eventsBone Health Service Arm11,688
Total, other adverse eventsUsual Care (Control) Arm01,424
Total, serious adverse eventsBone Health Service Arm01,688
Total, serious adverse eventsUsual Care (Control) Arm01,424

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40853653DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bone Health Service Arm vs Usual Care (Control) Arm: Proportion With FracturesTrial comparisons
Bone Health Service Arm vs Usual Care (Control) Arm: Proportion of Participants Screened for OsteoporosisTrial comparisons
Bone Health Service Arm vs Usual Care (Control) Arm: Proportion of Patients Initiating Osteoporosis Medication (%)Trial comparisons
Bone Health Service Arm vs Usual Care (Control) Arm: Gastrointestinal Medication PrescriptionsTrial comparisons
Bone Health Service Arm vs Usual Care (Control) Arm: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Bone Health Service Arm vs Usual Care (Control) Arm: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04079868

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04079868/registered