ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04086121

A Study to Test the Long-term Safety of BI 655130 in Patients With Atopic Eczema Who Took Part in Study 1368-0032

NCT04086121, Phase 2, Terminated, Boehringer Ingelheim; results first posted 2022-05-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Test the Long-term Safety of BI 655130 in Patients With Atopic Eczema Who Took Part in Study 1368-0032. Trials, record NCT04086121. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04086121

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Test the Long-term Safety of BI 655130 in Patients With Atopic Eczema Who Took Part in Study 1368-0032
NCT number
NCT04086121
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
14 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Conditions
Dermatitis, Atopic
Interventions
Spesolimab
First posted
2019-09-11
Last updated
2025-02-24
Results first posted
2022-05-18
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated due to sponsor decision. The planned treatment period of 4 years was not reached.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 48From first dose until Week 48, up to 48 weeks.
Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) at week 48. The treatment emergent adverse event refer to the adverse event with an onset between start of treatment and end of the 16-week residual effect period after the last dose of trial medication.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. The percent change from baseline in EASI is calculated as: (EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. \[(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%\] ≥ 50%, then EASI50 = 1.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. \[(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%\] ≥ 75%, then EASI75 = 1.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
The SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index assesses elements: extent of disease, disease severity and subjective symptoms. The SCORAD consists of three elements: extent of disease, intensity of disease, and subjective symptoms (Pruritus and Sleep Loss). These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: score range 0-1-2), disease severity (B: score range 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C: score range 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103 for SCORAD score. The SCORAD range from 0 (no disease) to 103 (severe disease). The higher the SCORAD score, the more severe the Atopic Dermatitis is.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
The IGA scale allows investigators to assess overall disease severity at one given time point, and it consists of a five-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0= clear,1 =almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4= severe disease). The IGA scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 48From first dose until Week 48, up to 48 weeks.Safety analysis set (SAF): This patient set includes all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.
Percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.
Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 48Spesolimab 600 mg9Participants
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48Spesolimab 600 mg-3.74Standard Deviation 81.99Percent change
Percentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 48Spesolimab 600 mg33.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 48Spesolimab 600 mg22.2Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48Spesolimab 600 mg-10.07Standard Deviation 66.04Score on a scale
Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 48Spesolimab 600 mg22.2Percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSpesolimab 600 mg14
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSpesolimab 600 mg0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSpesolimab 600 mg14

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherDrug hypersensitivityImmune system disordersSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherAsymptomatic COVID-19Infections and infestationsSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherCellulitisInfections and infestationsSpesolimab 600 mg214
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsSpesolimab 600 mg314
otherSkin infectionInfections and infestationsSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherSoft tissue infectionInfections and infestationsSpesolimab 600 mg114
otherTinea pedisInfections and infestationsSpesolimab 600 mg114

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySpesolimab 600 mg014
Total, other adverse eventsSpesolimab 600 mg1114
Total, serious adverse eventsSpesolimab 600 mg214

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04086121

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04086121/events?page=2