ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04120402

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of EP-104IAR in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

NCT04120402, Phase 2, Completed, Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals Inc.; results first posted 2024-06-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of EP-104IAR in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Trials, record NCT04120402. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04120402

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of EP-104IAR in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT number
NCT04120402
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
318 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Interventions
EP-104IAR 25 mg, Vehicle
First posted
2019-10-09
Last updated
2024-06-25
Results first posted
2024-06-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale12 weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
SecondaryDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function Subscale12 weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Function subscale includes questions related to the physical functioning of osteoarthritis e.g. stair use, standing, walking etc. From a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC function score.
SecondaryDifference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain Subscale12 weeks
Area under the curve in change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) from Week 0 to Week 12 was calculated on a per-individual basis using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC was normalized to account for subjects whose actual days and nominal days at Week 12 differed. Treatments were compared using an ANCOVA model containing site; individual baseline WOMAC Pain; and treatment group as covariates.
SecondaryDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale24 weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
SecondaryDifference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders12 weeks
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) strict responders are defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease from baseline) in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain or function subscales (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) and an absolute change of at least 2 in the respective score. Patients who discontinued prior to Week 12 were considered non-responders.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale12 weeks
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function Subscale12 weeks
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDifference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain Subscale12 weeks
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.
score on a scale multiplied by daysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale24 weeks
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDifference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders12 weeks
The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain SubscaleEP-104IAR 25 mg-2.89Standard Error 0.166score on a scale
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain SubscalePlacebo (Vehicle)-2.23Standard Error 0.171score on a scale
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function SubscaleEP-104IAR 25 mg-2.59Standard Error 0.161score on a scale
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function SubscalePlacebo (Vehicle)-2.04Standard Error 0.166score on a scale
Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain SubscaleEP-104IAR 25 mg-235.67Standard Error 11.769score on a scale multiplied by days
Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain SubscalePlacebo (Vehicle)-166.78Standard Error 12.169score on a scale multiplied by days
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain SubscaleEP-104IAR 25 mg-2.26Standard Error 0.171score on a scale
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain SubscalePlacebo (Vehicle)-2.11Standard Error 0.175score on a scale
Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict RespondersEP-104IAR 25 mg87Participants
Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict RespondersPlacebo (Vehicle)61Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEP-104IAR 25 mg163
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo (Vehicle)155
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEP-104IAR 25 mg156
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo (Vehicle)148
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEP-104IAR 25 mg7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo (Vehicle)7

Adverse events20

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsEP-104IAR 25 mg1416316
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo (Vehicle)1215515
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsEP-104IAR 25 mg1416314
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo (Vehicle)1415514
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsEP-104IAR 25 mg61636
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo (Vehicle)91559
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersEP-104IAR 25 mg3816338
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo (Vehicle)2315526
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersEP-104IAR 25 mg41635
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersPlacebo (Vehicle)1015510

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEP-104IAR 25 mg0163
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo (Vehicle)0155
Total, other adverse eventsEP-104IAR 25 mg76163
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo (Vehicle)68155
Total, serious adverse eventsEP-104IAR 25 mg4163
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo (Vehicle)1155

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39401503DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
EP-104IAR 25 mg vs Placebo (Vehicle): Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict RespondersTrial comparisons
EP-104IAR 25 mg vs Placebo (Vehicle): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
EP-104IAR 25 mg vs Placebo (Vehicle): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04120402

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04120402/registered