ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04123405

Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis

NCT04123405, Phase 3, Completed, Sandoz; results first posted 2021-11-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis. Trials, record NCT04123405. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04123405

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis
NCT number
NCT04123405
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
944 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sandoz
Conditions
Rhinosinusitis
Interventions
acetylcysteine, Placebo
First posted
2019-10-10
Last updated
2021-11-19
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-000060-20
Results first posted
2021-11-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
SecondaryTime to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value\<0.05) improvement from placebo.
SecondaryTime to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value\<0.05) improvement from placebo.
SecondaryMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
SecondaryMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
SecondarySino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.
SecondarySino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.
SecondarySino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.
SecondarySino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.
Score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.
DaysNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.DaysNUMBER
SECONDARYMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14
Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.Score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group238

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine-4.8213Standard Deviation 1.98247Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine-4.7394Standard Deviation 1.99090Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine-4.7758Standard Deviation 1.96938Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetGroup D: Placebo-5.0180Standard Deviation 1.98262Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine-4.9085Standard Deviation 1.92431Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine-4.8688Standard Deviation 1.84448Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine-4.8002Standard Deviation 1.90569Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetGroup D: Placebo-5.1256Standard Deviation 1.95072Score on a scale
Time to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetGroup A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNADays
Time to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetGroup B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNADays

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine235
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine238
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine238
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup D: Placebo233
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine235
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine236
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine238
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetGroup D: Placebo230
Overall StudyPer-protocol SetGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine213
Overall StudyPer-protocol SetGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine215

Adverse events136

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEar congestionEar and labyrinth disordersGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine0235
otherEar congestionEar and labyrinth disordersGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine2238
otherEar congestionEar and labyrinth disordersGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine0238
otherEar congestionEar and labyrinth disordersGroup D: Placebo0233
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine0235
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine0238
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine1238
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersGroup D: Placebo0233
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine1235
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine2238

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine0235
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine0238
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine0238
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup D: Placebo0233
Total, other adverse eventsGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine9235
Total, other adverse eventsGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine15238
Total, other adverse eventsGroup C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine15238
Total, other adverse eventsGroup D: Placebo8233
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine0235
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine0238

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04123405

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04123405/results?page=2