ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04138277

A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ATB200/AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD)

NCT04138277, Phase 3, Completed, Amicus Therapeutics; results first posted 2026-01-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ATB200/AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD). Trials, record NCT04138277. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04138277

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ATB200/AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD)
NCT number
NCT04138277
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
119 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amicus Therapeutics
Conditions
Pompe Disease (Late-onset)
Interventions
AT2221, ATB200
First posted
2019-10-24
Last updated
2026-03-05
Results first posted
2026-01-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryIncidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugEntire extension study (mean = 40.5 months on treatment)Number of subjects with TEAE, TESAE, and TEAE leading to discontinuation during this long-term extension study
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)baseline, Week 208Motor function was measured using the 6-minute walk distance (meters)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sitting % Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)baseline, Week 208Pulmonary function was measured by sitting % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Lower Extremity Scorebaseline, Week 208
Strength was measured by manual muscle testing (MMT) using the Medical Research Council grading scale (0 to 5 points, with 5 indicating normal function). Change from baseline values \>0 represent improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score for Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) - Physical Functionbaseline, Week 208
Physical Function Short Form 20a (v2.0) consisted of 20 questions. The first 14 questions were each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = unable to do; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = with some difficulty; 4 = with a little difficulty; 5 = without any difficulty; the next 6 questions were each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = cannot do; 2 = quite a lot; 3 = somewhat; 4 = very little; 5 = not at all. The total score was calculated by summing up scores (1 to 5) across all items. Total scores range from 20 to 100. A higher score represented a better outcome.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Score for PROMIS® - Fatiguebaseline, Week 208
Fatigue Short Form 8a consisted of 6 questions, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = not at all; 2 = a little bit; 3 = somewhat; 4 = quite a bit; 5 = very much; and 2 questions, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = never; 2 = rarely; 3 = sometimes; 4 = often; 5 = always. The total score was calculated by summing up scores (1 to 5) across all items resulting in a total score range from 6 (minimum) to 30 (maximum). A lower score represented lower fatigue symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gait, Stairs, Gower, Chair (GSGC) Testbaseline, Week 208
The GSGC consisted of a 10-meter walk for evaluation of gait, a 4-stair climb, Gowers' maneuver, and arising from a chair. Results of the GSGC included the time required to complete the individual tests, individual scores for each of the tests (1 to 7 points for each of gait, 4-stair climb, and Gowers' maneuver, and 1 to 6 points for arising from a chair), and a total score. GSGC total score was the sum of the component scores from the 4 functional tests. The total score ranged from a minimum of 4 points (normal performance) to a maximum of 27 points (worst performance).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Responsesbaseline, Week 208
The EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: Level 1=no problems, Level 2=slight problems, Level 3=moderate problems, Level 4=severe problems, and Level 5=extreme problems. In this categorical assessment, subjects were asked to indicate their health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions. Outcomes for change from baseline at Week 208 include 'no change', 'worsening' relative to baseline category, or 'improvement' relative to baseline category. Changes (worsening or improvement) are shown by magnitude of change (how many Levels) in each categorical assessment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Overall Physical Well-being (Subject's Global Impression of Change [SGIC], Question 1)baseline, Week 208The Subject's Global Impression of Change overall physical well-being (question 1) is scored on a 7-point rating scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved."
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Overall Statusbaseline, Week 208
The Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is designed to record the physician's assessment of the subject's status, taking into account the subject's signs and symptoms and other neuromuscular symptoms, and signs relative to their status at the Baseline Visit. The PGIC is based on a single item that is scored on a 7-point rating scale ranging from 1 "very much worse" to 7 "very much improved."

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYIncidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugEntire extension study (mean = 40.5 months on treatment)Open-label extension (OLE) Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least one dose of ATB200/AT2221 combination treatment in Study ATB200-07ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)baseline, Week 208
Motor function was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 39 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 18 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
metersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sitting % Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)baseline, Week 208
Pulmonary function was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 41 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 15 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
percent predicted FVCMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Lower Extremity Scorebaseline, Week 208
Muscle strength was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 35 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 15 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Total Score for Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) - Physical Functionbaseline, Week 208
PROMIS-Physical Function was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 42 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 19 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Total Score for PROMIS® - Fatiguebaseline, Week 208
PROMIS-Fatigue was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 42 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 19 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gait, Stairs, Gower, Chair (GSGC) Testbaseline, Week 208
GSGC was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 33 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 14 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Responsesbaseline, Week 208
EQ-5D-5L was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 42 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 19 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Overall Physical Well-being (Subject's Global Impression of Change [SGIC], Question 1)baseline, Week 208
The SGIC was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 42 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 19 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Overall Statusbaseline, Week 208
The PGIC was evaluated using the Full Analysis Set (consisting of subjects in the study who had both a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for at least 1 of the main efficacy endpoints). Baseline and Month 208 assessment available for 40 subjects in the Treatment Continued Group and 19 subjects in the Treatment Switched Group.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group126

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Continued GroupSubjects with TEAEs80Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Switched GroupSubjects with TEAEs37Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Continued GroupSubjects with TESAEs17Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Switched GroupSubjects with TESAEs10Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Continued GroupSubjects with TEAEs leading to discontinuation6Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Switched GroupSubjects with TEAEs leading to discontinuation2Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Continued GroupSubjects with TEAE leading to death1Participants
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment Switched GroupSubjects with TEAE leading to death0Participants
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Treatment Continued Group-33.3Standard Deviation 37.60meters
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Treatment Switched Group-8.6Standard Deviation 62.77meters

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
PretreatmentSTARTEDTreatment Continued Group82
PretreatmentSTARTEDTreatment Switched Group37
PretreatmentCOMPLETEDTreatment Continued Group81
PretreatmentCOMPLETEDTreatment Switched Group37
PretreatmentNOT COMPLETEDTreatment Continued Group1
PretreatmentNOT COMPLETEDTreatment Switched Group0
TreatmentSTARTEDTreatment Continued Group81
TreatmentSTARTEDTreatment Switched Group37
TreatmentCOMPLETEDTreatment Continued Group58
TreatmentCOMPLETEDTreatment Switched Group30

Adverse events220

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment Continued Group281
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment Switched Group237
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Continued Group681
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Switched Group037
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Continued Group2181
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Switched Group737
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Continued Group1581
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Switched Group537
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Continued Group781
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Switched Group437

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Continued Group181
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Switched Group037
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Continued Group8081
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Switched Group3737
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Continued Group1781
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Switched Group1037

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
38418563DERIVEDPubMed
41631150DERIVEDPubMed
41769220DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Treatment Continued Group vs Treatment Switched Group: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Treatment Continued Group vs Treatment Switched Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04138277

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04138277/results?page=2