ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04145219

House Dust Mite Allergy Trial In Children

NCT04145219, Phase 3, Completed, ALK-Abelló A/S; results first posted 2024-06-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. House Dust Mite Allergy Trial In Children. Trials, record NCT04145219. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04145219

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
House Dust Mite Allergy Trial In Children
NCT number
NCT04145219
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,460 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
ALK-Abelló A/S
Conditions
Allergic Rhinitis Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Rhinitis Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite
Interventions
Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, Placebo
First posted
2019-10-30
Last updated
2024-06-12
Results first posted
2024-06-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAverage Daily Total Combined Rhinitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCRS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
The primary endpoint in the trial was the average daily total combined rhinitis symptoms and medication score (TCRS) during the primary efficacy assessment period. The average daily TCRS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinitis symptoms and medication score (on a scale of 0-24). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more use of rhinitis medication. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 daily TCRS values, the primary endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondaryThe Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
The average rhinitis DSS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinitis symptom score (on a scale of 0-12). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 rhinitis DSS values, the endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondaryThe Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
Average rhinitis DMS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinitis medication use (on a scale of 0-12). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 rhinitis DMS values, the endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondaryThe Average Daily Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
Average rhinoconjunctivitis TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 daily TCS values, the endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondaryThe Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
The average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (on a scale of 0-18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 rhinoconjunctivitis DSS values, the endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondaryThe Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0-20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 rhinoconjunctivitis DMS values, the endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondaryOverall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score at the End of TrialWeek leading up to visit 7 (at the end of the primary efficacy assessment period, after approximately 52-57 weeks of treatment)The overall PRQLQ score measures the effect of rhinoconjunctivitis on participant's quality of life on a scale of 0-6. Higher scores indicate worse rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life.
SecondaryThe Average Asthma Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
The average asthma DSS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily asthma symptom score (on a scale of 0-12). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the 8-week primary efficacy assessment period. For example, if a subject reported 56 asthma DSS values, the endpoint is calculated as the average of those values.
SecondarySABA Free Days During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
The endpoint SABA free days evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in SABA use. The higher the proportion of SABA free days the higher the estimated probability of a participant having a day where they didn't use SABA.
SecondaryWeekly Number of Puffs of As-needed SABA Use During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMP
Average weekly number of puffs of as-needed SABA use evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in the use of asthma reliever medication (SABA), and is calculated as 7 times the average of the daily number of puffs of as-needed SABA use. Higher values indicate more medication use.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAverage Daily Total Combined Rhinitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCRS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy period.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy period.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Daily Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy period.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYOverall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score at the End of TrialWeek leading up to visit 7 (at the end of the primary efficacy assessment period, after approximately 52-57 weeks of treatment)Participants in the full analysis set with observationsscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Asthma Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants with asthma in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSABA Free Days During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants with asthma in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy periodProbability (%) of a SABA free dayNUMBER
SECONDARYWeekly Number of Puffs of As-needed SABA Use During the Primary Efficacy Assessment Period8 weeks (primary efficacy assessment period), which started 44-49 weeks after initiation of IMPParticipants with asthma in the full analysis set with observations in the primary efficacy period.weekly number of puffsMEAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Average Daily Total Combined Rhinitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCRS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)3.4Standard Error 0.3score on a scale
Average Daily Total Combined Rhinitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCRS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodPlacebo SLIT-tablet4.4Standard Error 0.3score on a scale
The Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)1.5Standard Error 0.1score on a scale
The Average Rhinitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodPlacebo SLIT-tablet1.9Standard Error 0.1score on a scale
The Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)1.4Standard Error 0.2score on a scale
The Average Rhinitis Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodPlacebo SLIT-tablet1.9Standard Error 0.2score on a scale
The Average Daily Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)4.0Standard Error 0.4score on a scale
The Average Daily Total Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (TCS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodPlacebo SLIT-tablet5.2Standard Error 0.4score on a scale
The Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)1.7Standard Error 0.1score on a scale
The Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Daily Symptom Score (DSS) During the Primary Efficacy Assessment PeriodPlacebo SLIT-tablet2.2Standard Error 0.2score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)727
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo SLIT-tablet731
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)688
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo SLIT-tablet705
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)39
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo SLIT-tablet26

Adverse events86

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherOral pruritusGastrointestinal disordersHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)4197271,149
otherOral pruritusGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo SLIT-tablet185731425
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)243727512
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo SLIT-tablet164731320
otherLip swellingGastrointestinal disordersHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)151727282
otherLip swellingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo SLIT-tablet3873163
otherGlossodyniaGastrointestinal disordersHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)142727313
otherGlossodyniaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo SLIT-tablet4173154
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)135727260
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo SLIT-tablet81731125

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)0727
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo SLIT-tablet0731
Total, other adverse eventsHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)608727
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo SLIT-tablet534731
Total, serious adverse eventsHDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM)16727
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo SLIT-tablet6731

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32548677DERIVEDPubMed
39678704DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
HDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM) vs Placebo SLIT-tablet: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
HDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM) vs Placebo SLIT-tablet: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04145219

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04145219/results?page=2