ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04162795

A Study to Evaluate Cooling Sensation of an Allergy Product in Adults With a History of Allergies

NCT04162795, Phase 4, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2021-02-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate Cooling Sensation of an Allergy Product in Adults With a History of Allergies. Trials, record NCT04162795. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04162795

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate Cooling Sensation of an Allergy Product in Adults With a History of Allergies
NCT number
NCT04162795
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
468 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
Loratadine (Claritin, BAY76-2211)
First posted
2019-11-14
Last updated
2021-02-04
Results first posted
2021-02-04
Limitations and caveats
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the duration of the cooling sensation were not able to be reported in this data set.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling SensationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the product provides a cooling sensation" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of perception of the sensation.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per LocationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to respond to question "the product provides a cooling sensation in the mouth, nose or throat" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of perception of the sensation.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing SensationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the product provides a refreshing sensation" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of perception of the sensation.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Refreshing of the Cooling SensationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the cooling sensation is refreshing" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the refreshing of the cooling sensation.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Unique Sensory Experience for an Allergy MedicineUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the sensory experience is unique for an allergy medicine" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the unique sensory experience sensation.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of Soothing Feeling on the ThroatUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the product feels soothing on the throat" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the soothing feeling.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of Liking the Flavor Sensation of the ProductUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "I like the flavor sensation of the product" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of liking the enjoyable flavor sensation.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Enjoyable Product ExperienceUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the product experience was enjoyable" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the enjoyable experience.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Great Taste of the ProductUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medication
Participants were asked to response to question "the product tastes great" using a 5 point agreement scale (range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Selection of the top 2 choices (strongly agree and somewhat agree) from the scale was considered as agreement of the great taste.
SecondaryTime to Perception of Cooling SensationUp to 60 minutes post ingestion of study medicationThe mean time point at which cooling was initially perceived was claimed as the onset of cooling. The mean onsets of cooling sensation in the mouth, nose and throat were reported.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling SensationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per LocationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing SensationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Refreshing of the Cooling SensationUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Unique Sensory Experience for an Allergy MedicineUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of Soothing Feeling on the ThroatUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of Liking the Flavor Sensation of the ProductUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Enjoyable Product ExperienceUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Agreement of the Great Taste of the ProductUp to 5 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Perception of Cooling SensationUp to 60 minutes post ingestion of study medicationAll participants who received the study medication and had an evaluation data for study medicationSecondsMEAN

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling SensationLoratadine Chewable Tablet0.9995% Confidence Interval 0.98 to 1.00Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per LocationLoratadine Chewable TabletCooling in Mouth0.9995% Confidence Interval 0.98 to 1.00Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per LocationLoratadine Chewable TabletCooling in Nose0.7195% Confidence Interval 0.67 to 0.76Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Cooling Sensation Per LocationLoratadine Chewable TabletCooling in Throat0.9395% Confidence Interval 0.90 to 0.95Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing SensationLoratadine Chewable TabletRefreshing0.9695% Confidence Interval 0.94 to 0.98Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing SensationLoratadine Chewable Tablet...Refreshing in Mouth0.9695% Confidence Interval 0.94 to 0.97Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing SensationLoratadine Chewable Tablet...Refreshing in Nose0.6195% Confidence Interval 0.57 to 0.66Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of Perception of Refreshing SensationLoratadine Chewable Tablet...Refreshing in Throat0.8895% Confidence Interval 0.85 to 0.91Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Refreshing of the Cooling SensationLoratadine Chewable Tablet0.9695% Confidence Interval 0.94 to 0.97Proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Agreement of the Unique Sensory Experience for an Allergy MedicineLoratadine Chewable Tablet0.9495% Confidence Interval 0.92 to 0.96Proportion of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLoratadine Chewable Tablet468
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLoratadine Chewable Tablet442
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLoratadine Chewable Tablet26

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet1442
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet1442
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsLoratadine Chewable Tablet1442
otherLaryngeal inflammationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet2442
otherSalivary duct inflammationGastrointestinal disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet1442
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet2442
otherRhinorrheaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet1442
otherOcular sensory symptomEye disordersLoratadine Chewable Tablet1442

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLoratadine Chewable Tablet0442
Total, other adverse eventsLoratadine Chewable Tablet9442
Total, serious adverse eventsLoratadine Chewable Tablet0442

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04162795

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04162795/registered