ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04171765

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Placebo16.795% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 54.82Percentage of Participants
Proportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Fixed Dose 50 mg37.595% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 77.30Percentage of Participants
Proportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Fixed Dose 75 mg14.395% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 47.35Percentage of Participants
Proportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Fixed Dose 100 mg33.395% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 79.39Percentage of Participants
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52PlaceboBaseline20.15Standard Deviation 6.35percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 50 mgBaseline20.67Standard Deviation 6.05percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 75 mgBaseline19.30Standard Deviation 3.99percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 100 mgBaseline18.12Standard Deviation 7.70percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52PlaceboWeek 16 change from baseline-3.47Standard Deviation 2.28percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 50 mgWeek 16 change from baseline-8.20Standard Deviation 8.58percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 75 mgWeek 16 change from baseline-2.23Standard Deviation 9.05percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 100 mgWeek 16 change from baseline-10.25Standard Deviation 4.76percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52PlaceboWeek 52 change from baseline-4.46Standard Deviation 6.23percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 50 mgWeek 52 change from baseline-2.50Standard Deviation 8.13percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 75 mgWeek 52 change from baseline-3.46Standard Deviation 11.57percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Fixed Dose 100 mgWeek 52 change from baseline-3.53Standard Deviation 6.54percentage of hepatic fat fraction
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Placebo16.795% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 54.82Percentage of participants
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Fixed Dose 50 mg37.595% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 77.30Percentage of participants
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Fixed Dose 75 mg42.995% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 86.66Percentage of participants
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Fixed Dose 100 mg33.395% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 79.39Percentage of participants

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04171765/results