ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04180163

Efficacy and Safety of Lanadelumab (SHP643) in Japanese Participants With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

NCT04180163, Phase 3, Completed, Shire; results first posted 2022-09-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Lanadelumab (SHP643) in Japanese Participants With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE). Trials, record NCT04180163. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04180163

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Lanadelumab (SHP643) in Japanese Participants With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
NCT number
NCT04180163
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
12 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
Interventions
Lanadelumab
First posted
2019-11-27
Last updated
2022-09-30
Results first posted
2022-09-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving Attack-Free Status for the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182Day 0 through Day 182
A participant was considered as attack free during an efficacy evaluation period if the participant had no investigator-confirmed hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks during that efficacy evaluation period. A HAE attack was defined as the symptoms or signs consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the following locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). Number of participants achieving attack-free status for the efficacy evaluation period of Day 0 through Day 182 were assessed.
SecondaryNumber of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
Efficacy evaluation period consisted of four periods: Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 182 (the end of Treatment Period A), Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 364 (the end of Treatment Period B), presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 182, presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 364. Number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during each of the efficacy evaluation periods were assessed.
SecondaryNumber of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
Efficacy evaluation period consisted of four periods: Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 182 (the end of Treatment Period A), Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 364 (the end of Treatment Period B), presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 182, presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 364. Number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks requiring acute treatment during each of the efficacy evaluation periods were assessed.
SecondaryNumber of Moderate or Severe Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
Severe attack was defined as Grade 3 (some assistance usually required, medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible), moderate attack was defined as Grade 2 (some assistance may be needed, no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required). Number of investigator-confirmed moderate or severe HAE attacks during the each of efficacy evaluation periods was assessed. Efficacy evaluation period consisted of four periods: Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 182 (the end of Treatment Period A), Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 364 (the end of Treatment Period B), presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 182, presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 364.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Maximum Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attack Severity During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
Efficacy evaluation period consisted of four periods: Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 182 (the end of Treatment Period A), Day 0 (after study drug administration) through Day 364 (the end of Treatment Period B), presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 182, presumed steady-state period from Day 70 through Day 364. Number of participants with maximum HAE attack severity during each of the efficacy evaluation periods was assessed. HAE attack severity was calculated per participant based on the severity categories as follows: No attack, Mild, Moderate, and Severe.
SecondaryNumber of High-Morbidity Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
A high morbidity HAE attack was defined as any attack that has at least 1 of the following characteristics: severe, results in hospitalization (except hospitalization for observation \<24 hours), hemodynamically significant (systolic blood pressure \<90, requires intravenous (IV) hydration, or associated with syncope or near syncope) or laryngeal. Number of high-morbidity investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during each of the 4 efficacy evaluation periods (Treatment Period A, Overall Treatment Period, Presumed Steady-state Period for Treatment Period A and Overall Presumed Steady-state Period) were assessed.
SecondaryTime to First Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attack After Day 0 for the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodDay 0 through Day 182
The time to the first HAE attack (days) after Day 0 for the efficacy evaluation period of Day 0 through Day 182 was calculated from the date and time of the first dose of lanadelumab for the efficacy evaluation period (Day 0 through Day 182) to the date and time of the first in HAE attack after the first open-label dose for the efficacy evaluation period of Day 0 through Day 182. Kaplan-Meier Method was used for analysis and the Kaplan Meier estimate expressed as time (in days) to first HAE attack After Day 0 for Treatment Period A (Day 0 through Day 182) is presented.
SecondaryTime to First Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attack After Day 0 for the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodDay 70 through Day 182
The time to the first HAE attack (days) after Day 0 for the efficacy evaluation period of Day 70 through Day 182 was calculated from the date and time of the first dose of lanadelumab for the efficacy evaluation period (Day 70 through Day 182) to the date and time of the first in HAE attack after the first open-label dose for the efficacy evaluation period of Day 70 through Day 182. Kaplan-Meier Method was used for analysis and the Kaplan Meier estimate expressed as time (in days) to first HAE attack After Day 0 for presumed steady-state period for Treatment Period A (Day 70 through Day 182) is presented.
Secondary
Number of Participants Achieving at Least 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in the Investigator-Confirmed Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) Per 4 Weeks Relative to the Run-in Period NNA for Each of Efficacy Evaluation Periods
Day 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
Run- in Period was 4 weeks and may have been extended up to 8 weeks to determine participants' Baseline attack rate. The normalized number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks (NNA) during each efficacy evaluation period will be expressed as a monthly (28 days) HAE attack rate. Number of participants achieving at least 50%, 70% and 90% reduction in the investigator-confirmed NNA per 4 weeks relative to the Run-in Period normalized NNA for each of the 4 efficacy evaluation periods (Treatment Period A, Overall Treatment Period, Presumed Steady-state Period for Treatment Period A, and Overall Presumed Steady-state Period) were assessed. For each participant, the percentage reduction was calculated as the run-in period attack rate minus the treatment period attack rate divided by the run-in period attack rate, multiplied by 100. The responder categories were not mutually exclusive, participants may appear in more than one category as applicable based on their percentage reduction.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) <1.0 Per 4 Weeks, <0.75 Per 4 Weeks, <0.50 Per 4 Weeks and <0.25 Per 4 Weeks for Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364
The NNA (investigator-confirmed) during each efficacy evaluation period was expressed as a monthly (28 days) HAE attack rate. Number of participants achieving NNA \<1.0 per 4 weeks, \<0.75 per 4 weeks, \<0.50 per 4 weeks, and \<0.25 per 4 weeks for each of the 4 efficacy evaluation periods (Treatment Period A, Overall Treatment Period, Presumed Steady-state Period for Treatment Period A, and Overall Presumed Steady-state Period) were assessed. The responder categories were not mutually exclusive, participants may appear in more than one category as applicable based on their HAE attack rate.

Outcomes22

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Achieving Attack-Free Status for the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182Day 0 through Day 182FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.HAE attacksNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.HAE attacksNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Moderate or Severe Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.HAE attacksNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Maximum Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attack Severity During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of High-Morbidity Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.HAE attacksNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to First Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attack After Day 0 for the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodDay 0 through Day 182FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to First Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attack After Day 0 for the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodDay 70 through Day 182FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Achieving at Least 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in the Investigator-Confirmed Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) Per 4 Weeks Relative to the Run-in Period NNA for Each of Efficacy Evaluation Periods
Day 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) <1.0 Per 4 Weeks, <0.75 Per 4 Weeks, <0.50 Per 4 Weeks and <0.25 Per 4 Weeks for Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsDay 0 through Day 182, Day 0 through Day 364, Day 70 through Day 182, Day 70 through Day 364FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group157

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Achieving Attack-Free Status for the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182Lanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w5Participants
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 0 Through Day 18292HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 0 Through Day 364189HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 70 Through Day 18255HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 70 Through Day 364152HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 0 Through Day 18279HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 0 Through Day 364168HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 70 Through Day 18246HAE attacks
Number of Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 70 Through Day 364135HAE attacks
Number of Moderate or Severe Investigator-Confirmed Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks During Each of the Efficacy Evaluation PeriodsLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4wDay 0 Through Day 18272HAE attacks

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Run-in Period (4 or up to 8 Weeks)STARTEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12
Run-in Period (4 or up to 8 Weeks)COMPLETEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12
Run-in Period (4 or up to 8 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w0
Treatment Period A (Weeks 1 to 26)STARTEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12
Treatment Period A (Weeks 1 to 26)COMPLETEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12
Treatment Period A (Weeks 1 to 26)NOT COMPLETEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w0
Treatment Period B (Weeks 27 to 52)STARTEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12
Treatment Period B (Weeks 27 to 52)COMPLETEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12
Treatment Period B (Weeks 27 to 52)NOT COMPLETEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w0
Safety Follow-up Period (Weeks 53 to 56)STARTEDLanadelumab 300 mg q2w or q4w12

Adverse events390

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersTreatment Period A: Non-HAE112
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersTreatment Period A: HAE012
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersTreatment Period B: Non-HAE112
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersTreatment Period B: HAE012
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersSafety Follow-up Period: Non-HAE012
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersSafety Follow-up Period: HAE012
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Period A: Non-HAE112
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Period A: HAE012
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Period B: Non-HAE112
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Period B: HAE012

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Period A: Non-HAE012
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Period A: HAE012
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Period B: Non-HAE012
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Period B: HAE012
Total, all-cause mortalitySafety Follow-up Period: Non-HAE012
Total, all-cause mortalitySafety Follow-up Period: HAE012
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Period A: Non-HAE1012
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Period A: HAE712
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Period B: Non-HAE912
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Period B: HAE812

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04180163

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04180163/registered?page=2