ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04189445

Futibatinib in Patients With Specific FGFR Aberrations

NCT04189445, Phase 2, Terminated, Taiho Oncology, Inc.; results first posted 2025-10-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Futibatinib in Patients With Specific FGFR Aberrations. Trials, record NCT04189445. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04189445

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Futibatinib in Patients With Specific FGFR Aberrations
NCT number
NCT04189445
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
115 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Taiho Oncology, Inc.
Conditions
Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumor, Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer, Myeloid or Lymphoid Neoplasms (MLN)
Interventions
Futibatinib
First posted
2019-12-06
Last updated
2025-10-08
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-004084-49
Results first posted
2025-10-08
Limitations and caveats
The Sponsor made a strategic decision to terminate the study considering enrollment challenges for some of the cohorts in the trial.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Independent Central Review (IRC) in Cohorts A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants experiencing a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST version 1.1), based on IRC of radiological images. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR was calculated based on the best overall response recorded from the start of treatment until progressive disease or start of subsequent new anticancer treatment. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
PrimaryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Cohort CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR (per response criteria for myeloid or lymphoid neoplasm) based on investigator assessment of imaging, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.
SecondaryORR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants experiencing a best overall response of PR or CR (per RECIST 1.1), based on investigator assessment. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR was calculated based on the best overall response recorded from the start of treatment until progressive disease or start of subsequent new anticancer treatment. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR in based on IRC) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryDOR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR in based on Investigator Assessment) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryProgression- Free Survival (PFS) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
PFS was defined as the time from first dose of the study therapy to the date of death (any cause) or disease progression (based on IRC), whichever occurs first. The PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier method, with PFS time being censored on the date of the last disease assessment. The 95% CI for median PFS was provided using the Kaplan-Meier procedure.
SecondaryPFS Based on Investigator Review in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
PFS was defined as the time from first dose of the study therapy to the date of death (any cause) or disease progression (based on Investigator Review), whichever occurs first. The PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier method, with PFS time being censored on the date of the last disease assessment. The 95% CI for median PFS was provided using the Kaplan-Meier procedure.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) in Cohorts A, B and CUp to 31 months
OS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the death date. Participants without a documented death date were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. The OS was presented using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. The 95% CI for median OS was provided using the Kaplan-Meier procedure.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) Based on IRC in Cohort A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants experiencing a best overall response of stable disease (SD), PR, or CR (per RECIST 1.1), based on IRC. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of target lesion diameters from the smallest on study (including baseline), with an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or the appearance of new lesions. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
SecondaryDCR Based on Investigator Review in Cohort A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants experiencing a best overall response of SD, PR, or CR (per RECIST 1.1), based on IRC. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of target lesion diameters from the smallest on study (including baseline), with an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm, or the appearance of new lesions. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Independent Central Review (IRC) in Cohorts A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYComplete Response (CR) Rate in Cohort CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)No participants were enrolled in Cohort C, hence no data was collected.
SECONDARYORR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
All responders population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a response. No participants were enrolled in Cohort C, hence no data was collected. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with events.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDOR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
All responders population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a response. No participants were enrolled in Cohort C, hence no data was collected. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with events.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression- Free Survival (PFS) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with reported disease progression or death. No participants were enrolled in Cohort C, hence no data was collected.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPFS Based on Investigator Review in Cohorts A, B and CAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)
All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with reported disease progression or death. No participants were enrolled in Cohort C, hence no data was collected.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) in Cohorts A, B and CUp to 31 months
All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with reported death. No participants were enrolled in Cohort C, hence no data was collected.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR) Based on IRC in Cohort A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDCR Based on Investigator Review in Cohort A and BAt the end of every 2 cycles until disease progression (Up to 31 months)All treated population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Independent Central Review (IRC) in Cohorts A and BFutibatinib (Cohort A)6.995% Confidence Interval 2.6 to 14.4percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Independent Central Review (IRC) in Cohorts A and BFutibatinib (Cohort B)17.995% Confidence Interval 6.1 to 36.9percentage of participants
ORR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A and BFutibatinib (Cohort A)9.295% Confidence Interval 4.1 to 17.3percentage of participants
ORR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A and BFutibatinib (Cohort B)10.795% Confidence Interval 2.3 to 28.2percentage of participants
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CFutibatinib (Cohort A)5.695% Confidence Interval 3.5 to NAmonths
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CFutibatinib (Cohort B)3.995% Confidence Interval 2.1 to NAmonths
DOR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A, B and CFutibatinib (Cohort A)5.695% Confidence Interval 3.0 to NAmonths
DOR Based on Investigator Assessment in Cohorts A, B and CFutibatinib (Cohort B)5.695% Confidence Interval 2.0 to NAmonths
Progression- Free Survival (PFS) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CFutibatinib (Cohort A)1.995% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 3.5months
Progression- Free Survival (PFS) Based on IRC in Cohorts A, B and CFutibatinib (Cohort B)2.995% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 3.7months

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFutibatinib (Cohort A)87
Overall StudySTARTEDFutibatinib (Cohort B)28
Overall StudySTARTEDFutibatinib (Cohort C)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFutibatinib (Cohort A)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFutibatinib (Cohort B)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFutibatinib (Cohort C)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFutibatinib (Cohort A)87
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFutibatinib (Cohort B)28
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFutibatinib (Cohort C)0

Adverse events498

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFutibatinib (Cohort A)1687
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFutibatinib (Cohort B)328
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersFutibatinib (Cohort A)187
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersFutibatinib (Cohort B)028
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFutibatinib (Cohort A)187
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFutibatinib (Cohort B)028
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersFutibatinib (Cohort A)287
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersFutibatinib (Cohort B)028
otherCardiac disorderCardiac disordersFutibatinib (Cohort A)187
otherCardiac disorderCardiac disordersFutibatinib (Cohort B)028

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFutibatinib (Cohort A)5487
Total, all-cause mortalityFutibatinib (Cohort B)2428
Total, other adverse eventsFutibatinib (Cohort A)8687
Total, other adverse eventsFutibatinib (Cohort B)2728
Total, serious adverse eventsFutibatinib (Cohort A)2387
Total, serious adverse eventsFutibatinib (Cohort B)628

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Futibatinib (Cohort A) vs Futibatinib (Cohort B): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Futibatinib (Cohort A) vs Futibatinib (Cohort B): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04189445

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04189445/events?page=2