ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04191135

Study of Olaparib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab After Induction With First-Line Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (MK-7339-009/KEYLYNK-009)

NCT04191135, Phase 2, Terminated, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2024-02-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Olaparib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab After Induction With First-Line Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (MK-7339-009/KEYLYNK-009). Trials, record NCT04191135. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04191135

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Olaparib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab After Induction With First-Line Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (MK-7339-009/KEYLYNK-009)
NCT number
NCT04191135
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
462 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
Interventions
Pembrolizumab, Olaparib, Carboplatin, Gemcitabine
First posted
2019-12-09
Last updated
2026-09-14
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-001892-35
Results first posted
2024-02-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 29 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS is reported based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 29 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS is reported based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Tumors With a Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10Up to approximately 29 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Only participants with a CPS ≥10 were included in this analysis. PFS is reported based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors With a CPS ≥10Up to approximately 29 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Only participants with a CPS ≥10 were included in this analysis.
SecondaryPFS in Participants With Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutation (BRCAm) TumorsUp to approximately 29 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Only participants with BRCAm-positive tumors were included in this analysis. PFS is reported based on the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
SecondaryOS in Participants With BRCAm TumorsUp to approximately 29 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Only participants with BRCAm-positive tumors were included in this analysis.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality-of-Life (QoL) Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Items 29 and 30 Combined Score
Baseline and week 18
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status (GHS) question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the QoL question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were each scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent), then summed. Summed raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better overall outcome. Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined scores was calculated based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with scores as response variable with covariates for treatment by time interaction, stratification factors (response at randomization (CR/PR vs. SD), baseline CPS for PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 CPS\<1 vs. PD-L1 CPS≥1) and BRCA status at randomization (BRCAm vs. BRCAwt)) as covariates.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physical Functioning Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Items 1- 5 ScoreBaseline and week 18
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much), then summed. Summed raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better overall outcome. The change from baseline in physical functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) score was calculated based on a cLDA model with scores as response variable with covariates for treatment by time interaction, stratification factors (response at randomization (CR/PR vs. SD), baseline CPS for PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 CPS\<1 vs. PD-L1 CPS≥1) and BRCA status at randomization (BRCAm vs. BRCAwt)) as covariates.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Items 21-24 ScoreBaseline and week 18
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 4 questions about their emotional functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much), then summed. Summed raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better overall outcome. Change from baseline in emotional functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 21-24) score was calculated based on a cLDA model with scores as response variable with covariates for treatment by time interaction, stratification factors (response at randomization (CR/PR vs. SD), baseline CPS for PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 CPS\<1 vs. PD-L1 CPS≥1) and BRCA status at randomization (BRCAm vs. BRCAwt)) as covariates.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Systemic Therapy Side Effects Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer-Specific QoL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) Items 1-4, 6, 7, and 8 Score
Baseline and week 18
EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30, consisting of functional scales (body image, sexual enjoyment, sexual functioning, future perspective) and symptom scales (systemic therapy side effects, upset by hair loss, arm symptoms, breast symptoms). Participant responses to 7 questions about their systemic therapy side effects are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All, 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better quality of life. The change from baseline in systemic therapy side effects (EORTC QLQ-BR23 Items 1-4, 6, 7, and 8) score was calculated based on a cLDA model with scores as response variable with covariates for treatment by time interaction, stratification factors (response at randomization (CR/PR vs. SD), baseline CPS for PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 CPS\<1 vs. PD-L1 CPS≥1) and BRCA status at randomization (BRCAm vs. BRCAwt)) as covariates.

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 29 monthsThe analysis population included all randomized participantsMonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 29 monthsThe analysis population included all randomized participantsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Tumors With a Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10Up to approximately 29 monthsThe analysis populations included all randomized participants with a CPS ≥10MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors With a CPS ≥10Up to approximately 29 monthsThe analysis population included all randomized participants with a CPS ≥10MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPFS in Participants With Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutation (BRCAm) TumorsUp to approximately 29 monthsThe analysis population included all randomized participants with BRCAm tumorsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOS in Participants With BRCAm TumorsUp to approximately 29 monthsThe analysis population included all randomized participants with BRCAm tumorsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality-of-Life (QoL) Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Items 29 and 30 Combined Score
Baseline and week 18The analysis population included all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and who completed at least one assessment for this outcome.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physical Functioning Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Items 1- 5 ScoreBaseline and week 18The analysis population included all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and who completed at least one assessment for this outcome.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Items 21-24 ScoreBaseline and week 18The analysis population included all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and who completed at least one assessment for this outcome.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Systemic Therapy Side Effects Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer-Specific QoL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) Items 1-4, 6, 7, and 8 Score
Baseline and week 18The analysis population included all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and who completed at least one assessment for this outcome.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group52

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Pembrolizumab + Olaparib5.595% Confidence Interval 4.2 to 8.3Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Pembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine5.695% Confidence Interval 4.3 to 6.9Months
Overall Survival (OS)Pembrolizumab + Olaparib25.195% Confidence Interval 18.3 to NAMonths
Overall Survival (OS)Pembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine23.495% Confidence Interval 15.8 to NAMonths
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Tumors With a Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10Pembrolizumab + Olaparib5.795% Confidence Interval 2.9 to 13.9Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Tumors With a Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10Pembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine5.795% Confidence Interval 3.8 to 7.6Months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors With a CPS ≥10Pembrolizumab + OlaparibNA95% Confidence Interval 17.0 to NAMonths
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors With a CPS ≥10Pembrolizumab + Carboplatin + GemcitabineNA95% Confidence Interval 15.5 to NAMonths
PFS in Participants With Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutation (BRCAm) TumorsPembrolizumab + Olaparib12.495% Confidence Interval 8.3 to NAMonths
PFS in Participants With Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutation (BRCAm) TumorsPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine8.495% Confidence Interval 5.4 to NAMonths

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Induction TreatmentSTARTEDPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment462
Induction TreatmentSTARTEDPembrolizumab + Olaparib0
Induction TreatmentSTARTEDPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine0
Induction TreatmentTreatedPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment460
Induction TreatmentTreatedPembrolizumab + Olaparib0
Induction TreatmentTreatedPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine0
Induction TreatmentCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment0
Induction TreatmentCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Olaparib0
Induction TreatmentCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine0
Induction TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment462

Adverse events489

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment274460361
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Olaparib5413575
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine69133121
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment84460179
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Olaparib1613531
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine2313365
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment2346037
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Olaparib1113520
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine513318
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment218460485

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment124460
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + Olaparib50135
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine54136
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment456460
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Olaparib121135
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine128133
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine Induction Treatment80460
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Olaparib35135
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine32133

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41405563RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib vs Pembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine: Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib vs Pembrolizumab + Carboplatin + Gemcitabine: Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04191135

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04191135/registered?page=2