ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04191616

Study of Early Relapsed, Lenalidomide-refractory Subjects Eligible for Carfilzomib Triplet

NCT04191616, Phase 2, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2023-11-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Early Relapsed, Lenalidomide-refractory Subjects Eligible for Carfilzomib Triplet. Trials, record NCT04191616. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04191616

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Early Relapsed, Lenalidomide-refractory Subjects Eligible for Carfilzomib Triplet
NCT number
NCT04191616
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
54 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, Pomalidomide
First posted
2019-12-10
Last updated
2025-09-04
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-001169-34
Results first posted
2023-11-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Response Rate (ORR) As Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From day 1 cycle 1 until the primary analysis (PA) data cutoff (DCO); the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeks
Overall response was defined as the best overall confirmed response of: Complete response (CR): Negative immunofixation on serum and urine, soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance, \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow (BM). Stringent CR (sCR): CR and normal serum free light chain ratio and no clonal cells in BM. Very Good Partial Response (VGPR): Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein (urine M-protein level \< 100 mg/24-h). PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to \< 200 mg/24-h. Assessment was by IRC per International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC). The 90% confidence intervals were estimated using the Clopper-Pearson method (1994).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Minimal Residual Disease Negative Complete Response (MRD[-]CR) as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 cycle 1 to month 12 (8 to 13 month window)
The MRD\[-\]CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who reached MRD\[-\]CR at the 12 month landmark (8- to 13-month window). MRD\[-\]CR was defined as the achievement of CR (including sCR or better) per IMWG-URC by IRC assessment and MRD\[-\] status at a sensitivity of 10\^-5 using next-generation sequencing based method in the bone marrow. The 90% CIs were estimated using the Clopper-Pearson method (1994).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From the first dose of any study treatment until the end of study or 30 days after the last dose of any study treatment, whichever occured earlier; Median (min, max) was 8.5 (1.0, 46.6) months
TEAEs were defined as events with onset on or after the administration of the first dose of any study treatment and within the end of study, or 30 days after the last dose of any study treatment, whichever one was earlier, excluding events reported after end of study date.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving MRD[-] ResponseFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the end of study (EOS); the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the EOS was 55.3 weeksMRD\[-\] response was defined as achievement of MRD\[-\] status using next generation sequencing (NGS) based method in the bone marrow at any time.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained MRD[-]CR for at Least 12 Months as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 cycle 1 to month 12 (8 to 13 month window)
MRD\[-\]CR at the 12 months landmark was defined as achievement of CR (including sCR or better) per IMWG-URC by IRC and MRD\[-\] status at a sensitivity of 10\^-5 using NGS based method in the bone marrow at the 12 months landmark (from 8 months to 13 months window). Maintaining MRD\[-\]CR for at least 12 months (- 4 weeks) was considered as sustained.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained MRD[-]CR at Month 24 as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 cycle 1 to month 26 (19 to 26 month window)Sustained MRD\[-\]CR at 24 months included participants that maintained MRD\[-\]CR for 12 months or more after achieving MRD\[-\]CR status at 12 months.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response as Assessed by the IRCFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the PA DCO; the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeks
Disease response and progression were determined using IMWG-URC. Durations were calculated for responders. Medians and percentiles were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 90% CIs for medians and percentiles were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation.
SecondaryTime to Response as Assessed by the IRCFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the PA DCO; the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeks
Durations were calculated for responders. Time to response was defined as the time from start of any study treatment date to the earliest date when confirmed sCR, CR, very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) was first achieved.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRCFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the PA DCO; the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeks
PFS was defined as time from start of treatment until progression or death from any cause. Medians and percentiles were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997). 90% CIs for medians were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS)From day 1 cycle 1 until the EOS; the mean duration of KPd treatment was 55.3 weeks.
OS was defined as the time from the start of treatment until death from any cause. Medians and percentiles were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 90% CIs for medians were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Response Rate (ORR) As Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From day 1 cycle 1 until the primary analysis (PA) data cutoff (DCO); the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeksThe safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Minimal Residual Disease Negative Complete Response (MRD[-]CR) as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 cycle 1 to month 12 (8 to 13 month window)The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib. The analysis was pre-specified until PA DCO only.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From the first dose of any study treatment until the end of study or 30 days after the last dose of any study treatment, whichever occured earlier; Median (min, max) was 8.5 (1.0, 46.6) monthsThe safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving MRD[-] ResponseFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the end of study (EOS); the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the EOS was 55.3 weeksThe safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Sustained MRD[-]CR for at Least 12 Months as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 cycle 1 to month 12 (8 to 13 month window)The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Sustained MRD[-]CR at Month 24 as Assessed by the IRCDay 1 cycle 1 to month 26 (19 to 26 month window)The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response as Assessed by the IRCFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the PA DCO; the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeksThe safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib. Only participants who achieved a partial response or better were included in the analysis.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Response as Assessed by the IRCFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the PA DCO; the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeksThe safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib. Only participants who achieved a partial response or better were included in the analysis.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRCFrom day 1 cycle 1 until the PA DCO; the mean duration of KPd treatment as of the DCO was 42.0 weeksThe safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS)From day 1 cycle 1 until the EOS; the mean duration of KPd treatment was 55.3 weeks.The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of carfilzomib.monthsMEDIAN

Results by group11

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Response Rate (ORR) As Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Carfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)57.790% Confidence Interval 45.4 to 69.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Residual Disease Negative Complete Response (MRD[-]CR) as Assessed by the IRCCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)3.890% Confidence Interval 0.7 to 11.6percentage of participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Carfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)50Participants
Number of Participants Achieving MRD[-] ResponseCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)5Participants
Number of Participants With Sustained MRD[-]CR for at Least 12 Months as Assessed by the IRCCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)0Participants
Number of Participants With Sustained MRD[-]CR at Month 24 as Assessed by the IRCCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)0Participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response as Assessed by the IRCCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)20.390% Confidence Interval 9.2 to NAmonths
Time to Response as Assessed by the IRCCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)1.0Full Range 1 to 2months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRCCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)11.190% Confidence Interval 6.5 to NAmonths
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS)Carfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)17.690% Confidence Interval 11.2 to 23.5months

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Pre-assignment PeriodSTARTEDCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)54
Pre-assignment PeriodCOMPLETEDCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)52
Pre-assignment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)2
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)52
Treatment PeriodReceived CarfilzomibCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)52
Treatment PeriodReceived PomalidomideCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)52
Treatment PeriodReceived DexamethasoneCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)52
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)0
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)52

Adverse events61

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)1652
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)352
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)1752
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)1652
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)952
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)752
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)552
otherAstheniaGeneral disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)952
otherFatigueGeneral disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)1252
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)1152

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)3754
Total, other adverse eventsCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)4852
Total, serious adverse eventsCarfilzomib With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd)2252

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38497533BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04191616

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04191616/events?page=2