ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04220021

Safety and Therapeutic Potential of the FDA-approved Drug Metformin for C9orf72 ALS/FTD

NCT04220021, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, University of Florida; results first posted 2025-12-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Therapeutic Potential of the FDA-approved Drug Metformin for C9orf72 ALS/FTD. Trials, record NCT04220021. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04220021

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Therapeutic Potential of the FDA-approved Drug Metformin for C9orf72 ALS/FTD
NCT number
NCT04220021
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
41 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Conditions
C9orf72 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Frontotemporal Dementia
Interventions
Metformin
First posted
2020-01-07
Last updated
2026-08-20
Results first posted
2025-12-02
Limitations and caveats
Our C9orf72 ALS metformin clinical trial was not placebo-controlled but ALSFRS-R scores were compared to previously published C9orf72 ALS (PMID: 31578300) and all ALS patient (PMID: 25298304) natural history studies.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Unexpected Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Baseline through 24 weeksThe safety and tolerability of Metformin in participants with C9orf72 ALS currently treated with Metformin will be evaluated by the number of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events
PrimaryChange in Repeat Associated Non-AUG (RAN) Protein LevelsBaseline through week 24.
Assessment of RAN protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from participants calculated as the percentage change in polyglycine-proline (GP) levels in ng/ml at study start \& end of the study as measured by Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assays.
SecondaryChange in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreBaseline through Week 24
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is a quickly administered (5 minute) ordinal rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to assess the capability and independence of subjects across 12 functional activities/questions. The score represents the sum of 12 functional domain items where each item is scored from 0 to 4 (Max score for each functional domain is 4 (Normal function); Minimum score for each functional domain = 0 (No ability to perform the task). The total score range is from 0 to 48, with a score of 48 meaning no functional impairment and 0 meaning complete loss of function across all domains. The mean values reported are at each study visit which occurred at baseline and at approximately 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The total number of days between study visits varied due to scheduling issues.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects With Unexpected Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Baseline through 24 weeks
Forty-one subjects agreed to participate in the study. Twenty-three participants were defined as having Completed the study if they started the study medication and completed the ALSFRS-R evaluation at baseline and 24 weeks.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYChange in Repeat Associated Non-AUG (RAN) Protein LevelsBaseline through week 24.
Data from 17 of the 23 subjects were analyzed: 2 samples were excluded because the subjects were not drug compliant; data from 3 subjects were excluded because GP levels were not reliably detected; 1 sample was excluded because CSF was not able to be collected at the 24 week visit.
% change (ng/ml) from study start to endMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreBaseline through Week 24
Twenty three subjects were analyzed as per protocol at baseline, week 6 and week 24. Twenty-two subjects were analyzed at week 12 because the ALSFRS-R was not completed due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) travel difficulties at the 12 week time point. Two subjects who were not compliant with the medication throughout the study were excluded in Metformin compliant study completers study arm.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group11

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Subjects With Unexpected Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Study Completers0Participants
Number of Subjects With Unexpected Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]All Participants0Participants
Change in Repeat Associated Non-AUG (RAN) Protein LevelsStudy Completers With Reliable CSF MSD Values-27.93Inter-Quartile Range -43.98 to -1.91% change (ng/ml) from study start to end
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreStudy CompletersBaseline38.61Standard Deviation 6.73score on a scale
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreMetformin Compliant Study CompletersBaseline38.57Standard Deviation 7.06score on a scale
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreStudy CompletersVisit 2-approx. 6 wks37.74Standard Deviation 6.76score on a scale
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreMetformin Compliant Study CompletersVisit 2-approx. 6 wks37.57Standard Deviation 7.07score on a scale
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreStudy CompletersVisit 3-approx. 12 wks36.30Standard Deviation 6.92score on a scale
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreMetformin Compliant Study CompletersVisit 3-approx. 12 wks36.33Standard Deviation 7.25score on a scale
Change in ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ScoreStudy CompletersVisit 4-approx.24 wks34.13Standard Deviation 8.35score on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEnrolled Subjects41
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEnrolled Subjects23
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEnrolled Subjects18

Adverse events28

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersEnrolled Subjects164121
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersStudy Completers92314
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEnrolled Subjects6416
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersStudy Completers3233
otherIndigestionGastrointestinal disordersEnrolled Subjects4416
otherIndigestionGastrointestinal disordersStudy Completers3234
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsEnrolled Subjects104120
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsStudy Completers82317
otherAbrasionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEnrolled Subjects4418
otherAbrasionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersStudy Completers3237

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEnrolled Subjects041
Total, all-cause mortalityStudy Completers023
Total, other adverse eventsEnrolled Subjects3541
Total, other adverse eventsStudy Completers1623
Total, serious adverse eventsEnrolled Subjects241
Total, serious adverse eventsStudy Completers023

Papers7

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
8721066BACKGROUNDPubMed
10540002BACKGROUNDPubMed
16084801BACKGROUNDPubMed
25298304BACKGROUNDPubMed
25548957BACKGROUNDPubMed
31578300BACKGROUNDPubMed
38018119DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Enrolled Subjects vs Study Completers: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Study Completers vs All Participants: Number of Subjects With Unexpected Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Trial comparisons
Enrolled Subjects vs Study Completers: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04220021

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04220021/events?page=2