ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04222972

A Study of Pralsetinib Versus Standard of Care for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

NCT04222972, Phase 3, Terminated, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2026-03-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Pralsetinib Versus Standard of Care for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Trials, record NCT04222972. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04222972

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Pralsetinib Versus Standard of Care for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
NCT number
NCT04222972
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
223 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
RET-fusion Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Lung Neoplasm, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Respiratory Tract Neoplasms, Thoracic Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Neoplasms, Lung Diseases, Respiratory Tract Disease, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic, Bronchial Diseases, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma, Neoplasms by Histologic Type, Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal, Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue
Interventions
Pralsetinib, Carboplatin, Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, Pembrolizumab, Gemcitabine, Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel
First posted
2020-01-10
Last updated
2026-03-05
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-002463-10
Results first posted
2026-03-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryArm A vs Arm B: Treatment Period: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 50 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as determined by the investigator with the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the SOD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate median PFS. 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryArm A vs Arm B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Up to approximately 50 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. 95% CI for rates were constructed using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
SecondaryArm A vs Arm B: Overall Survival (OS)From randomization to death (up to approximately 50 months)OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. K-M method was used to estimate median OS. 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to approximately 50 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. SAE is any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect that is fatal or life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ScoreBaseline up to 50 months
ECOG is a 6-point scale (0-5) used to assess participants functional status, where, 0= Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory \& able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; 2= ambulatory \& capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up \& about more than 50% of waking hours; 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4= completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5= dead.
SecondaryArm A vs Arm B: Duration of Response (DOR)Up to approximately 50 months
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (OR) to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. K-M method was used to estimate median DOR. 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryArm A vs Arm B: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)Up to approximately 50 months
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced the best response of stable disease (SD) with a minimum duration of 6 months, a CR, or a PR, as assessed by investigator with use of RECIST v1.1. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. 95% CI for rates were constructed using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages are rounded off.
SecondaryArm A vs Arm B: Disease Control Rate (DCR)Up to approximately 50 months
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced the best response of CR, or PR, or SD, as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. 95% CI for rates were constructed using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages are rounded off.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYArm A vs Arm B: Treatment Period: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to approximately 50 months
ITT population included all randomized participants whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to Arms A and B, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYArm A vs Arm B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Up to approximately 50 months
ITT population included all randomized participants whether or not the assigned study treatment is received. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to Arms A and B, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYArm A vs Arm B: Overall Survival (OS)From randomization to death (up to approximately 50 months)
ITT population included all randomized participants whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to Arms A and B, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to approximately 50 monthsSafety-evaluable population included all participants who receive any amount of any study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ScoreBaseline up to 50 months
Safety-evaluable population included all participants who receive any amount of any study drug. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to the treatment period, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYArm A vs Arm B: Duration of Response (DOR)Up to approximately 50 months
ITT population included all randomized participants whether or not the assigned study treatment is received. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with an objective response of CR or PR. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to Arms A and B, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYArm A vs Arm B: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)Up to approximately 50 months
ITT population included all randomized participants whether or not the assigned study treatment is received. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to Arms A and B, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYArm A vs Arm B: Disease Control Rate (DCR)Up to approximately 50 months
ITT population included all randomized participants whether or not the assigned study treatment is received. As specified in the protocol, assessment of this outcome measure was limited to Arms A and B, as the objective was to compare pralsetinib with SOC platinum-containing anticancer treatment regimens.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Arm A vs Arm B: Treatment Period: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Arm A: Treatment Period- SOC9.095% Confidence Interval 7.1 to 11.5months
Arm A vs Arm B: Treatment Period: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Arm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib18.795% Confidence Interval 11.1 to 25.2months
Arm A vs Arm B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Arm A: Treatment Period- SOC41.695% Confidence Interval 32.40 to 51.24percentage of participants
Arm A vs Arm B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Arm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib65.595% Confidence Interval 55.79 to 74.26percentage of participants
Arm A vs Arm B: Overall Survival (OS)Arm A: Treatment Period- SOC39.895% Confidence Interval 39.8 to NAmonths
Arm A vs Arm B: Overall Survival (OS)Arm B: Treatment Period- PralsetinibNA95% Confidence Interval 29.6 to NAmonths
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Arm A: Treatment Period- SOCAEs104Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Arm B: Treatment Period- PralsetinibAEs108Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Arm C: Crossover Period- PralsetinibAEs38Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Arm A: Treatment Period- SOCSAEs38Participants

Participant flow21

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDArm A: Treatment Period- SOC113
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib110
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib0
Treatment PeriodSafety-evaluable PopulationArm A: Treatment Period- SOC104
Treatment PeriodSafety-evaluable PopulationArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib108
Treatment PeriodSafety-evaluable PopulationArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib0
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDArm A: Treatment Period- SOC0
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib0
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib0
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDArm A: Treatment Period- SOC113

Adverse events645

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A: Treatment Period- SOC4710463
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib5210871
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib103813
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A: Treatment Period- SOC51045
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib1310816
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib2382
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A: Treatment Period- SOC21042
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib61087
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib3384
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A: Treatment Period- SOC1910431

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A: Treatment Period- SOC27113
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib33110
Total, all-cause mortalityArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib838
Total, other adverse eventsArm A: Treatment Period- SOC103104
Total, other adverse eventsArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib106108
Total, other adverse eventsArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib3838
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A: Treatment Period- SOC38104
Total, serious adverse eventsArm B: Treatment Period- Pralsetinib67108
Total, serious adverse eventsArm C: Crossover Period- Pralsetinib2238

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04222972

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04222972/results?page=2