ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04225715

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at 24 Weeks Post-End of Treatment (EOT)Follow-up Week (FUW) 24
HBsAg loss was defined as quantitative HBsAg \<0.05 international units/milliliters (IU/mL). The percentage of participants with HBsAg loss was calculated as number of participants with HBsAg loss / total number of participants \*100. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBsAg LossCombos 1 and 5: Weeks 24, 36, 48 and FUW 48; Combos 2, 3, 4, 6 and NUC Arm: Week 48 and FUW 48; Combo 7: Week 24; Combo 8: Week 36
HBsAg loss was defined as quantitative HBsAg \<0.05 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBsAg loss was calculated as number of participants with HBsAg loss / total number of participants \*100. 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBsAg SeroconversionCombos 1 and 5: Weeks 24, 36, 48, FUW 24 and FUW 48; Combos 2, 3, 4, 6 and NUC Arm: Week 48, FUW 24 and FUW 48; Combo 7: Week 24 and FUW 24; Combo 8: Week 36 and FUW 24
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as a quantitative HBsAg \< 0.05 IU/mL and a positive anti-HBs antibody (defined as per assay reactive threshold anti-HBs ≥10 IU/L). 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Early Antigen (HBeAg) Loss in Baseline HBeAg-positive ParticipantsWeeks 12, 24, 36, and 48; FUW 12, 24, 36, and 48HBeAg loss was defined as negative /non-reactive HBeAg level. Percentages have been rounded off.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion in Baseline HBeAg-positive ParticipantsWeeks 12, 24, 36, and 48; FUW 12, 24, 36, and 48HBeAg seroconversion was defined as a negative /non-reactive HBeAg level and a positive anti-HBe antibody. Percentages have been rounded off.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA) < Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ), <200 IU/mL, and <2,000 IU/mLFUW 12, 24, 36, and 48
Chronic HBV infection is characterized by high levels of circulating HBV DNA. Therefore, HBV levels are indicative of virological response. At screening participants were on NUC therapy and had circulating HBV DNA levels below the assay LLOQ or below 20 IU/mL for at least 6 months. The emergence of a virological breakthrough (HBV DNA \>100 IU/mL or \>1 log increase from nadir) while on NUC therapy, or the emergence of a virological relapse (\>2,000 IU/mL) in participants taken off NME combination and NUC therapy during follow-up, was monitored through the quantification of HBV DNA in plasma.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HBsAg, Anti-HBs, HBeAg, HBV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) and HBV DNA Levels Over TimeHBsAg, Anti-HBs, HBeAg & HBV RNA: Combo 1 to 6 and NUC arm: Weeks 24, 36, 48, FUW 24 and FUW 48; Combo 7: Week 24, FUW 24 & FUW 48; Combo 8: Weeks 24, 36, FUW 24 & FUW 48; HBV DNA: FUW 24 and FUW 48
The serological markers of HBV infection include viral antigens (HBsAg \& HBeAg) and antibody (anti-HBs). Changes in serological markers and efficacy biomarkers (HBV RNA) from baseline are reported. Change from baseline for HBV DNA was assessed in 'ON NUC' participants.
SecondaryCombos 7 and 8: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Week 1 (AUC1-0-168h) of PD-L1 LNAPredose on Day 1 and up to 168 hours post dose (Week 1)
The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
SecondaryCombos 7 and 8: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Week 1 (Cmax1-0-168h) of PD-L1 LNAPredose on Day 1 and up to 168 hours post dose (Week 1)
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
SecondaryCombos 7 and 8: AUC Over the Dosing Interval at Week 12 (AUC12-0-168h) of PD-L1 LNAPredose on Day 1 of Week 12 up to 168 hours post dose (Week 12)
The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
SecondaryCombos 7 and 8: Cmax at Week 12 (Cmax12-0-168h) of PD-L1 LNAPredose on Day 1 of Week 12 up to 168 hours post dose (Week 12)
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. As per planned analysis data was collected and reported in a pooled manner for Combos 7 and 8.
SecondaryCombos 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) Over Days 1-28 of siRNAPredose on Day 1 and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post dose each day, up to Day 28The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
SecondaryCombos 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8: Cmax Over Days 1-28 of siRNAPredose on Day 1 and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post dose each day, up to Day 28The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
SecondaryCombos 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve During the Dosing Interval (AUC Tau) Over Days 29-56 of siRNAFrom Day 29 up to Day 56
The AUC tau was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. Simulations for the dosing interval between Day 29 and Day 56 was done using population PK modeling informed by sparse PK samples collected on Days 1, 85, 169, 253, and 337 at predose, 1-3 hours, and 4-6 hours post dose.
SecondaryCombos 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8: Cmax Over Days 29-56 of siRNAFrom Day 29 up to Day 56
The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples. Simulations for the dosing interval between Day 29 and Day 56 was done using population PK modeling informed by sparse PK samples collected on Days 1, 85, 169, 253, and 337 at predose, 1-3 hours, and 4-6 hours post dose.
SecondaryCombos 1 and 6: AUC of TLR7Predose and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 3, 5 on Weeks 12 and 36The AUC was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
SecondaryCombos 1 and 6: Cmax of TLR7Predose and 1-3 and 4-6 hours post-dose on Days 1, 3, 5 on Weeks 12 and 36The Cmax was predicted and summarized by modelling \& simulation via the PopPK method based on pre and post dose samples.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From Day 1 up to end of 48 weeks of follow up (up to approximately 1.8 years)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
SecondaryCombos 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8: Number of Participants With Anti-siRNA AntibodiesFrom Day 1 up to end of follow up (up to approximately 4 years)
Treatment-emergent anti drug antibody (ADA) was defined as participants who seroconverted or experienced a boost in preexisting ADA during the study. Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but develop an ADA response following study drug administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples were greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 4-fold (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
SecondaryCombos 7 and 8: Number of Participants With Anti-PD-L1 AntibodiesFrom Day 1 for Combo 7 and 8 up to end of follow up (Up to approximately 2 years)
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as participants who seroconverted or experienced a boost in preexisting ADA during the study. Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but develop an ADA response following study drug administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples were greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 4-fold (treatment-enhanced ADA response).

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04225715/registered