ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04228042

Infigratinib Before Surgery for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

NCT04228042, Phase 1, Phase 2, Terminated, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; results first posted 2025-01-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Infigratinib Before Surgery for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer. Trials, record NCT04228042. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04228042

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Infigratinib Before Surgery for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer
NCT number
NCT04228042
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
15 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Conditions
Renal Pelvis and Ureter Urothelial Carcinoma
Interventions
Infigratinib, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration, Surgical Procedure
First posted
2020-01-14
Last updated
2025-01-01
Results first posted
2025-01-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySafety and Tolerability - TOX RateFrom day 1 until 30 days following last dose of infigratinib or until surgery, whichever occurs last, up to a total of 3 months.
The study will estimate percentage of patients who are not able to complete treatment (discontinuation) due to excessive toxicity along with the 90% exact confidence interval (NOTE: excessive toxicity is defined as treatment related adverse events that cause patients not to complete 2-cycles of planned treatment schedule, or delay in planned surgery greater than 14 days)
SecondaryEvaluate the Objective Response Rate (CR+PR) of Infigratinib After 2 Cycles in UTUC With and Without FGFR3alterationsEfficacy will be measured at time of surgery or approximately 2 months
Percentage of patients achieving a point in time objective response (either complete or partial response \[CR or PR\]) after 2 cycles of infigratinib. Tumor mapping will be performed from the endoscopic evaluation (after any biopsies) and this will be used to compare to pathologic (NUx/Ux cohort) or ureteroscopic (endoscopy cohort) findings in order to determine responses. Tumor mapping will be performed based on endoscopic findings, noting location, number of tumors, tumor architecture, and location of biopsies; and will again be performed during pathologic evaluation again noting size, location, number of tumors, architecture, and absence of tumor at any previously identified tumor. A difference of 3mm will be considered within error of measurement. All analyses will be performed on patients stratified as having or not having FGFR3 alterations.
SecondaryTo Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)QoL surveys were obtained at baseline (day 1), pre-op after having received infigratinib for 2 cycles and 30 days after surgery, up to 3 months
Categorical variables were tabulated with frequency and percentage; continuous variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. A linear transformation to standardize the raw score was calculated for Functional/symptom scales and global health status (QOL) using the guidance in Scoring the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms. Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to compare functional/symptom scales and global health status (QOL) between different time points. A higher score for symptoms represents a worse outcome.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSafety and Tolerability - TOX RateFrom day 1 until 30 days following last dose of infigratinib or until surgery, whichever occurs last, up to a total of 3 months.All patients who received at least one dose of infigratinib and completed surgery were included in the anlaysis. There were no delays to planned surgery in any of the participantspercentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYEvaluate the Objective Response Rate (CR+PR) of Infigratinib After 2 Cycles in UTUC With and Without FGFR3alterationsEfficacy will be measured at time of surgery or approximately 2 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTo Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)QoL surveys were obtained at baseline (day 1), pre-op after having received infigratinib for 2 cycles and 30 days after surgery, up to 3 monthsscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Safety and Tolerability - TOX RateInfigratinib Plus Surgery14.3090% Confidence Interval 2.6 to 38.5percentage of patients
Evaluate the Objective Response Rate (CR+PR) of Infigratinib After 2 Cycles in UTUC With and Without FGFR3alterationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery66.790% Confidence Interval 34.5 to 90.2percentage of participants
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryFatigue score: Pre-OP17.46Standard Deviation 12.1score on a scale
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryFatigue score: post-OP15.08Standard Deviation 20.26score on a scale
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryScore of diarrhea: At screening12.82Standard Deviation 21.68score on a scale
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryScore of diarrhea: Pre-OP12.80Standard Deviation 16.88score on a scale
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryScores of appetite loss: At screening4.76Standard Deviation 12.1score on a scale
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryScores of appetite loss: Pre-OP19.05Standard Deviation 21.54score on a scale
To Evaluate Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL)Infigratinib Plus SurgeryScores of appetite loss: 30 days Post-OP7.14Standard Deviation 14.19score on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDInfigratinib Plus Surgery14
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInfigratinib Plus Surgery14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInfigratinib Plus Surgery0

Adverse events40

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHyperphosphatemiaInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery9149
otherHyponatremiaInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery2142
otherLipase IncreaseInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery3143
otherAmylase IncreaseInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery2142
otherHyperkalemiaInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery2142
otherCreatinine IncreaseInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery2142
otherBUN IncreaseInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery1141
otherCytokine Release SyndromeInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery1141
otherAnemiaInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery1141
otherHypercalcemiaInvestigationsInfigratinib Plus Surgery1141

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInfigratinib Plus Surgery014
Total, other adverse eventsInfigratinib Plus Surgery1214
Total, serious adverse eventsInfigratinib Plus Surgery114

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38573872DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
P30CA016672The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG)KOONG, ALBERTUNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTRNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2026

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04228042

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04228042/events?page=2