ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04266301

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) (Primary Efficacy Results)up to approx. 39 monthsOS is the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) (Final Efficacy Results)up to approx. 52 monthsOS is the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
SecondaryKey Secondary Endpoint 1: Time to Definitive Deterioration of Fatigue Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scoreup to approx. 52 months
FACIT-Fatigue score is a 13-item questionnaire designed to assess fatigue in cancer participants. All items use a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing better quality of life. Time to definitive deterioration of fatigue is defined as time from randomization to at least 3 points worsening from baseline in FACIT-fatigue scores with no subsequently observed improvement above this threshold, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
SecondaryKey Secondary Endpoint 2: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Annualized Transfusion Free Rate for Transfusionup to approx. 52 months
Annualized transfusion free rate is defined as the average number of days in RBC transfusion-free intervals in a year (i.e., the total number of days in RBC transfusion-free intervals divided by the total days in the study multiplied by 365.25), where RBC transfusion-free intervals correspond to cumulative times of intervals with no evidence of RBC transfusion for at least 8 weeks at any point after randomization until death due to any cause.
SecondaryKey Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With at Least 3 Point Confirmed Improvement From Baseline in FACIT-fatigue Scoresup to approx. 52 months
FACIT-Fatigue score is a 13-item questionnaire designed to assess fatigue in cancer participants. All items use a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing better quality of life. The responder is defined as having 3 points improvement from baseline confirmed by a second improvement of 3 points at any time, regardless of preceding worsening. A participant who could not improve was considered as a non-responder.
Secondary
Key Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With at Least 10 Point Confirmed Improvement From Baseline in Physical Functioning Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
up to approx. 52 months
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer participants. Participants' responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1-5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A high score indicates a high / healthy level of functioning. The responder is defined as having 10 points improvement from baseline confirmed by a second improvement of 10 points at any time, regardless of preceding worsening. A participant who could not improve was considered as a non-responder.
SecondaryKey Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Participants With at Least 10 Point Confirmed Improvement From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Using EORTC-QLQ-C30up to approx. 52 months
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer participants. Participants' responses to 4 questions about their emotional functioning (Items 21-24) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A high score indicates a high / healthy level of functioning. The responder is defined as having 10 points improvement from baseline confirmed by a second improvement of 10 points at any time, regardless of preceding worsening. A participant who could not improve was considered as a non-responder.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Either CR, or mCR, or PR, or HI in Each Treatment Arm According to International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) as Per Investigator Assessmentup to approx. 52 months
Response rate of participants with complete remission (CR), or marrow remission (mCR), or partial remission (PR), or hematologic improvement (HI). CR: where the Bone marrow: ≤ 5% blasts with normal maturation of all cell lineages and Peripheral blood: where Hgb ≥ 10 g/dL AND Platelets ≥ 100\*109/L AND Neutrophils ≥ 1.0\*109/L AND Peripheral blasts 0%. mCR: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% blasts and blast count decrease by ≥ 50% compared to baseline; Peripheralblood/transfusion: Marrow CR may be achieved with or without improved blood counts or with or without transfusions PR: All CR criteria except bone marrow: ≥50% decrease from baseline in blasts in bone marrow AND blast count in bone marrow \>5%. HI: restoration or enhancement of the function of the body's blood cell-producing system that must last as least 8 weeks.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) According to International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) as Per Investigator Assessmentup to approx. 52 monthsResponse rate of participants with stable disease. SD is the failure to achieve at least partial response (PR), but no evidence of progression for \>8 weeks.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)up to approx. 52 months
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (including transformation to acute leukemia per WHO 2016), relapse from CR (IWG-MDS), or death. Disease progression: bone marrow blasts increase ≥ 50% over baseline, to \> 5% if initially \< 5%, \> 10% if 5%-\<10%, or \> 20% if 10%-\<20%. Includes a peripheral blood count decrease ≥ 50% from maximum remission/response levels: neutrophils \< 1.0x109/L, platelets \< 100x109/L, or hemoglobin drop ≥ 2 g/dL to \< 10 g/dL, becoming transfusion-dependent. Relapse from CR: baseline bone marrow blast % return, neutrophils decrease ≥ 50% to \< 1.0x109/L, platelets decrease ≥ 50% to \< 100x109/L, or hemoglobin drop ≥ 1.5 g/dL to \< 10 g/dL, becoming transfusion-dependent. Leukemia transformation: \> 20% blasts per WHO 2016 (Arber et al 2016).
SecondaryLeukemia-free Survival (LFS)up to approx. 52 monthsLFS is defined as the time from randomization to ≥ 20% blasts in bone marrow/peripheral blood (per WHO 2016 classification) or diagnosis of extramedullary acute leukemia, or death due to any cause
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Become Red Blood Cells (RBC) Transfusion Independent After Randomizationup to approx. 52 months
Improvement in RBC transfusion independence as per International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) criteria. RBC transfusion independence was defined as having received 0 units of RBC transfusions during at least 8 consecutive weeks after randomization. The number of participants was shown in only those with transfusion dependence at baseline (BL).
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Become Platelets Transfusion Independent After Randomizationup to approx. 52 months
Improvement in Platelets transfusion independence as per International Working Group for MDS (IWG-MDS) criteria. Platelets transfusion independence was defined as having received 0 units of Platelets transfusions during at least 8 consecutive weeks after randomization. The number of participants was shown in only those with transfusion dependence at baseline (BL).
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MBG453 (Parameter Cmax)0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 8 and 0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of C3D8Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed drug concentration after single dose administration (mass x volume-1).
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MBG453 (Parameter AUC)0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 8 and 0 hr (pre-dose) & 2 hrs (post-dose) of C3D8AUCinf is the AUC from time zero to infinity (mass x time x volume-1).
SecondaryADA Prevalence at Baseline and ADA-positive Participants On-treatmentBaseline, up to approx. 39 months
Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) prevalence is the number of participants with at least one sample meeting the criteria at baseline. ADA-positive participants were calculated as the number of participants with at least one on-treatment ADA-positive sample divided by the number of participants with a determinant baseline IG sample and at least one determinant post-baseline IG sample.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life (EuroQol) - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score Over TimeBaseline, every 3 cycles up to C48D1 (1 cycle = 28 days)
The EQ-5D-5L comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. For each of the 5 dimensions, subject's responses are scored on a 5-point scale (1=no problem to 5=extreme problems). Change from baseline is being presented for EQ Index score. Index score is defined as a weighted combination of the levels of the 5-dimention scales, ranging from 0 to 1 (perfect health), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The United States value set from Pickard et al 2019 was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Over TimeBaseline, every 3 cycles up to C48D1 (1 cycle = 28 days)
The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a visual analogue scale numbered from 0 to 100, with 0 being "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 being "the best health you can imagine". Change from baseline was presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scores Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30).Up to Cycle 12 Day 1 (C12D1) (1 cycle = 28 days)
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer participants. Participant's responses to 2 questions (Items 29+30: "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. Change from baseline to Cycle 12 Day 1 as presented.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04266301/registered