ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04278417

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

NCT04278417, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2024-08-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. Trials, record NCT04278417. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04278417

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
NCT number
NCT04278417
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
689 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Interventions
Brolucizumab 6 mg, Panretinal photocoagulation laser
First posted
2020-02-20
Last updated
2025-10-16
Results first posted
2024-08-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study EyeBaseline, Week 54
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of \>= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.
SecondaryNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study EyeWeek 54
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of "No PDR" is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) \< 7.
SecondaryNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study EyeWeek 96
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of "No PDR" is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) \< 7.
SecondaryNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study EyeUp to Week 54Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser
SecondaryNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study EyeUp to Week 96Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser
SecondaryArea Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study EyeBaseline, up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of \>= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values. The AUC in change from Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 (or Week 96) is referred to as the averaged change from Baseline in BCVA at each visit up to 54 (or Week 96), which was calculated as (BCVA at Week 6 + BCVA at Week 12 + ... + BCVA at Week 54 (or Week 96)) / number of visits with valid BCVA data from Week 6 to Week 54 (or Week 96) - BCVA at Baseline.
Secondary
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning.
Secondary
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning.
Secondary
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning.
Secondary
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment". A lower score represents better functioning.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study EyeBaseline, Week 54Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.Letters ReadLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study EyeWeek 54Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study EyeWeek 96Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study EyeUp to Week 54Full Analysis Set (FAS), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study EyeUp to Week 96Full Analysis Set (FAS), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYArea Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study EyeBaseline, up to Week 54 and up to Week 96Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.Letters readLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Full Analysis Set- Observed, for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Full Analysis Set-Observed, for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group114

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg0.2Standard Error 0.72Letters Read
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study EyePanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm-4.2Standard Error 0.73Letters Read
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg187Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study EyePanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm65Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg188Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study EyePanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm86Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg108Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study EyePanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm248Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study EyeBrolucizumab 6 mg126Participants
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study EyePanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm262Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBrolucizumab 6 mg347
Overall StudySTARTEDPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm342
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBrolucizumab 6 mg301
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm287
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBrolucizumab 6 mg46
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm55

Adverse events657

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBrolucizumab 6mg15347
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm16342
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOverall31689
otherCataract - Fellow eyeEye disordersBrolucizumab 6mg22347
otherCataract - Fellow eyeEye disordersPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm28342
otherCataract - Fellow eyeEye disordersOverall50689
otherCataract - Study eyeEye disordersBrolucizumab 6mg26347
otherCataract - Study eyeEye disordersPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm29342
otherCataract - Study eyeEye disordersOverall55689
otherConjunctival haemorrhage - Study eyeEye disordersBrolucizumab 6mg10347

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBrolucizumab 6mg8347
Total, all-cause mortalityPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm9342
Total, all-cause mortalityOverall17689
Total, other adverse eventsBrolucizumab 6mg241347
Total, other adverse eventsPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm254342
Total, other adverse eventsOverall495689
Total, serious adverse eventsBrolucizumab 6mg96347
Total, serious adverse eventsPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm105342
Total, serious adverse eventsOverall201689

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
42024409DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Brolucizumab 6 mg vs Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm: Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study EyeTrial comparisons
Brolucizumab 6 mg vs Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm: Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study EyeTrial comparisons
Brolucizumab 6 mg vs Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm: Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study EyeTrial comparisons
Brolucizumab 6 mg vs Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm: Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study EyeTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04278417

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04278417/results?page=2