ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04303195

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NG101 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Diabetic or Idiopathic Gastroparesis

NCT04303195, Phase 2, Completed, Neurogastrx, Inc.; results first posted 2025-08-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NG101 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Diabetic or Idiopathic Gastroparesis. Trials, record NCT04303195. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04303195

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NG101 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Diabetic or Idiopathic Gastroparesis
NCT number
NCT04303195
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
161 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Neurogastrx, Inc.
Conditions
Diabetic Gastroparesis, Idiopathic Gastroparesis
Interventions
NG101, Placebo
First posted
2020-03-10
Last updated
2025-08-28
Results first posted
2025-08-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Change from Baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD). Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period, a participant's score for that week was the mean of the daily scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD) for early satiety severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period, a participant's score for that week was the mean of the daily scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for postprandial fullness severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for postprandial fullness severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of VomitingBaseline to Week 12
Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for the number of discrete episodes of vomiting. Participants were asked to record the number of episodes of vomiting in the past 24 hours. Each episode counts as "1". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for 3-symptom severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week, the 3-symptom severity score is the average of the mean daily scores of nausea, early satiety, and postprandial fullness severity scores. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for 4-symptom severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week, the 4-symptom severity score is the average of the mean daily scores of nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and abdominal pain severity scores. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12
Per Protocol population included all participants in the Intent-To-Treat Population (all enrolled participants who were randomized) who do not have any major protocol deviations that would affect efficacy as determined by the study team.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of VomitingBaseline to Week 12units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScoreNG101 - 5 mg-3.55Standard Error 0.331units on a scale
Change From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScoreNG101 - 10 mg-3.65Standard Error 0.0348units on a scale
Change From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScoreNG101 - 20 mg-3.43Standard Error 0.348units on a scale
Change From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScorePlacebo-2.83Standard Error 0.347units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScoreNG101 - 5 mg-3.02Standard Error 0.343units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScoreNG101 - 10 mg-3.23Standard Error 0.360units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScoreNG101 - 20 mg-2.64Standard Error 0.362units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScorePlacebo-2.89Standard Error 0.361units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity ScoreNG101 - 5 mg-2.94Standard Error 0.373units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity ScoreNG101 - 10 mg-2.96Standard Error 0.392units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDNG101 - 5 mg40
Overall StudySTARTEDNG101 - 10 mg41
Overall StudySTARTEDNG101 - 20 mg40
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo40
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNG101 - 5 mg35
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNG101 - 10 mg35
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNG101 - 20 mg31
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo33
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNG101 - 5 mg5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNG101 - 10 mg6

Adverse events288

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNG101 - 5 mg040
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNG101 - 10 mg141
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNG101 - 20 mg140
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo040
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersNG101 - 5 mg040
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersNG101 - 10 mg041
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersNG101 - 20 mg140
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo040
otherPostural orthostatic tachycardia syndromeCardiac disordersNG101 - 5 mg040
otherPostural orthostatic tachycardia syndromeCardiac disordersNG101 - 10 mg141

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNG101 - 5 mg040
Total, all-cause mortalityNG101 - 10 mg041
Total, all-cause mortalityNG101 - 20 mg040
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo040
Total, other adverse eventsNG101 - 5 mg1540
Total, other adverse eventsNG101 - 10 mg1241
Total, other adverse eventsNG101 - 20 mg2140
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1440
Total, serious adverse eventsNG101 - 5 mg140
Total, serious adverse eventsNG101 - 10 mg041

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40367443DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04303195

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04303195/results?page=2