Contribution of Attachment and Educational Practices in the Expression of ADHD in School-aged Children
NCT04337125, Not applicable, Unknown, Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
Trial 10
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Contribution of Attachment and Educational Practices in the Expression of ADHD in School-aged Children | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NCT number | NCT04337125 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Status | Unknown | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Phases | Not applicable | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Enrollment | 160 participants, estimated | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Lead sponsor | Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Conditions | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Interventions | Neuropsychological and attachment/parenting assessment | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| First posted | 2020-04-07 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Last updated | 2020-06-09 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Registered outcomes 23
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cartes pour l'évaluation de l'Attachement et de la Mentalisation chez l'Enfant (CAME) | At enrollment | CAME is a child interview validated in french and allowing to assess the attachment representations and mentalization on base of interview for child between 7 and 14 years. The aim of interview is to tell the child the emotional relationships with parents (e.g. : "Can you tell me a moment where your mom/dad was mad at you" ? or "did you ever feel bad about yourself, feel bad about yourself ? "). The interview with child is recorded and transcribed word for word for the correction. In order to increasing quality of rating, 20% of interview will be recorded by a second evaluator (Pr Ayala Borghini) | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Primary | Security Scale - version français (SS-vf) | At enrollment | The child is asked to complete two questionnaires with each 10 items, one for the mother, the other for the father. Responses to each item are scored on a 4-point scale. In the version validated in French, the scores vary from 10 to 40. The highest scores correspond to the highest security of attachment to the parent. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Parent Education Practices Assessment Questionnaire (PEP) | At enrollment | PEP is a questionaire completed by parents to assess parents' child-rearing behavior and included 35 questions divided into 9 factors: positive parenting, monitoring, rules, punishment, ignorance, maternal reward and autonomy. This questionnaire will be used to compare the distribution of parenting practices in children with AHDH and with TD group | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Parent Educational Practices perceived by the child (PEPPE) | At enrollment | PEPPE is a questionaire completed by child and is composed to 18 questions to assess perception of parenting practices. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Behavioral Rating Inventory Executive Function (BRIEF) | At enrollment | BRIEF is a questionnaire rated by parents to assess child's executive functioning and is composed of a 86 items. Each item is rated on 0-2 scale. Higher scores indicate more executive difficulties. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Behavioral Rating Inventory Executive Function for Adult (BRIEF-A) | At enrollment | BRIEF-A is a self-report to assess parent's executive functioning in parent and includes 75 items. Each item is rated on 0-2 scale. Higher scores indicate more executive difficulties. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Test of Attentional Performance (TAP) | At enrollment | TAP is a computerized battery allowing attentional performances and different executive functions such as alertness, divided attention, motor inhibition, flexibility. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Stroop | At enrollment | This task includes three conditions: denomination, reading, interference. In the denomination condition, adult must saw as quickly as possible the color of each square presented in line. In the reading condition adult must read as quickly as the name of colors presented in line in black ink (congruent condition). In the interference condition, he must say the color of the ink of word (names of colors in a different ink than the color named) and thus inhibit the automatic treatment of read. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Counting Stroop Task | At enrollment | This task includes three conditions : counting, reading, interference. Items were presented on a computer screen in 10 lines, presented one at time, with 10 stimuli per line (squares with numbers or dots). In the counting condition, children had to report as fast as possible the number of dots within each square. In the reading condition, they had to read the number written within each square. In the interference condition, they had to report how many numbers were written within each square, while avoiding reading the number itself. Important variables for analysis are number of errors and time in interference condition. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Tower of London | At enrollment | The test consists of a support with three rods of different heights and three beads of different colors. The individual must reproduce, on the support and in a determined number of movements, a particular configuration proposed by the examiner. Important variable is the number of excess movements. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) | At enrollment | ADHD-RS is a questionnaire rated by parents to assess severity of ADHD and is composed of 18 items on 0-3 point scale. Higher scores indicates more ADHD symptoms. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Emotional Regulation Checklist - version française (ERC-vf) | At enrollment | ERC-vf is a questionnaire rated by parents to assess abilities of emotional regulation and emotional dysregulation of child and is composed to 24 items divided in two scale. Each item is rated on 0-4 scale. Higher score in emotional dysregulation scale indicate more difficulty. Higher score in scale of emotional regulation indicate more competence for regulate emotions. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Children Behavior Checklist (CBCL) | At enrollment | CBCL is a questionnaire rated by parents to assess child's behavior and presence of comorbid disorders such as anxiety, depression or oppositional disorders and is composed of 118 items. Each item is rated on 0-2 scale. Raw scores were converted on T-scores on three large scales (Internalising, Externalising, Total) and eight syndrome scales (Aggressive Behavior, Anxious/Depressed, Attention, Problems, Rule-Breaking Behavior, Social Problems, Somatic Complaints, Thought Problems, Withdrawn/Depressed). Higher scores indicate more difficulty. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Revised Card Sorting Test (RCST) | At enrollment | Cognitive flexibility of child will be assessed with RCST. Children must classed a set of 48 card according to three possibles categories (color, shape and number). Child must inferred the correct category on base examinator feedback. Important variable is the number of errors. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Kiddie-SADS-PL | At enrollment | The evaluation of child and adolescent mental health disorder is assessed by the Kiddie-SADS-PL DSM-5, a semi-structured diagnostic interview for children and adolescents | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 5th edition (WISC-V) | At enrollment | The child intellectual functioning will be assessed using the WISC-V (Wechsler, 2016). The Digit span subtest will be using as measure of working memory | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th edition (WAIS-IV) | At enrollment | The parental intellectual functioning will be assessed with the WAIS-IV subtests of Matrices and Figure weight. The Digit span subtest will be using as measure of working memory. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) | At enrollment | MINI is a semi-structured diagnostic interview for adults validated in french (Lecrubier \& al., 1997). Current and past symptoms of psychopathology are assessed in order to establish one or more diagnoses according to the DSM-5 criteria. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | ADHD Adult Scale Rating Scale (ASRS) | At enrollment | ASRS is a self-questionnaire to assess presence and severity of ADHD symptoms in parents and is composed of 18 items on 0-3 point scale. Higher scores indicates more ADHD symptoms. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Wenders Utah Rating Scale (WURS) | At enrollment | WURS is a self-questionnaire completed by parent that allows to assess retrospectively the presence of attentional difficulties and hyperactivity signs in childhood. The french version included 25 items rated from 0 to 4 depending on the severity of the behavior. Higher scores indicate more difficulty. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Outcomes 0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as | Source |
|---|
Results by group 0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units | Source |
|---|
Participant flow 0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted | Source |
|---|
Adverse events 0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events | Source |
|---|
Adverse event totals 0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk | Source |
|---|
Papers 0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as | Source |
|---|
Grants 0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
| Project | Title | Principal investigators | Organization | Funder | Fiscal years | Source |
|---|
Trial comparisons 0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|
Tests 4
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
| Test | Named as | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Card Sorting Test (Berg) | Secondary outcome | ConductCognition |
| Digit Span Test | Secondary outcome | ConductCognition |
| Stroop Color-Word Test | Secondary outcome | ConductCognition |
| Tower Planning | Secondary outcome | ConductCognition |
Source 5
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Release | trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Release manifest SHA-256 | 0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Registry capture | 2026-11-12 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Results copy, AACT | 2026-03-23 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NIH clinical studies file | 2026-11-13 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)