ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04338022

Study of Evobrutinib in Participants With RMS (evolutionRMS 1)

NCT04338022, Phase 3, Terminated, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; results first posted 2025-06-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Evobrutinib in Participants With RMS (evolutionRMS 1). Trials, record NCT04338022. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04338022

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Evobrutinib in Participants With RMS (evolutionRMS 1)
NCT number
NCT04338022
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,124 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Conditions
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
Teriflunomide, Evobrutinib
First posted
2020-04-08
Last updated
2025-06-12
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-004972-20
Results first posted
2025-06-12
Limitations and caveats
The Final Analysis represents the analysis of the cumulative data collected up to the Primary Analysis trigger and beyond through DBE up to the final database lock. Therefore, the endpoints were evaluated considering a time period from the start of DBTP to the end of the DBE Period.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes44

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDouble Blind Treatment Period (DBTP) and Double Blind Extension (DBE) Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)From baseline to 172 weeks
The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs,) and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).
PrimaryOpen Label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEsFrom OLE Baseline (DBTP Week 96) to OLE Week 52
Adverse event (AE): Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. Serious AE: an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important.
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE period)
Disability progression was defined as increase in EDSS of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1 point from baseline EDSS score, if EDSS score at baseline is 5.0 or less and an increase of \>=0.5 point, if the baseline score is 5.5. Disability progression is considered sustained for 12 weeks when the initial increase in the EDSS is confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants without 12-week CDP.
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 24-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Disability progression was defined as increase in EDSS of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1 point from baseline EDSS score, if EDSS score at baseline is 5.0 or less and an increase of \>=0.5 point, if the baseline score is 5.5. Disability progression is considered sustained for 24 weeks when the initial increase in the EDSS is confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks after the initial documentation of neurological worsening. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants without 24-week CDP.
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants With 24-Week Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Disability improvement was defined as a reduction of 1 point from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is \>= 2 and less than or equal to \[\<=\] 6 and a reduction of 0.5 point from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is \>= 6.5 and \<= 9.5. Disability improvement is considered sustained when the initial reduction in the EDSS score is confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks after the initial reduction. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants with 12-week CDI.
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156Baseline, Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Physical function was assessed with PROMISnq Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function - Multiple Sclerosis 15a (PROMISnq PF(MS) 15a). PROMISnq PF(MS) 15a assesses a participant's abilities and limitations with respect to everyday physical activities. Results are reported as a T-score. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 10 to 65. Higher T-scores represent higher physical function. Change from baseline in PROMIS PF score was analyzed using Mixed Effect Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) to evaluate the result of the 2 periods (DBTP and DBE).
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Score at Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156Baseline, Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
PROMIS Fatigue score was assessed with PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue - Multiple Sclerosis 8a (PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a). PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a assesses level of fatigue and its interference on daily activities. Results are reported as a T-score. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 33 to 85. Higher T-scores represent higher fatigue. Change from baseline in PROMIS fatigue score was analyzed using Mixed Effect Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) to evaluate the result of the 2 periods (DBTP and DBE).
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: Total Number of T1 Gadolinium-positive (Gd+) LesionsFrom baseline to 176 weeksAnalysis of Gadolinium-positive T1 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
SecondaryDBTP and DBE Period: New or Enlarging T2 Lesions RateFrom baseline to 176 weeks
Analysis of new or enlarging T2 lesions rate was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Negative binomial model for lesion count (summed over scans) includes treatment and covariates based on randomization strata and baseline volume of T2 lesion (continuous), with offset equal to the log of the time in years between the last available MRI scan and the baseline scan.
SecondaryDBTP Period: Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration (NfL) at Week 12Week 12NfL is a biomarker of neuro-axonal damage whose concentration was assessed in blood at Week 12.

Outcomes44

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDouble Blind Treatment Period (DBTP) and Double Blind Extension (DBE) Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)From baseline to 172 weeksFull Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment.relapses per yearMEAN
PRIMARYOpen Label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEsFrom OLE Baseline (DBTP Week 96) to OLE Week 52Safety (SAF) analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE period)Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. The result reported for this outcome measure are the results from data of combined DBTP and DBE periods.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 24-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. The result reported for this outcome measure are the results from data of combined DBTP and DBE periods.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants With 24-Week Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. The result reported for this outcome measure are the results from data of combined DBTP and DBE periods.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156Baseline, Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The result reported for this outcome measure are the results from data of combined DBTP and DBE periods.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Score at Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156Baseline, Week 48, Week 96, Week 120, Week 144 and Week 156 (combined DBTP and DBE periods)
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The result reported for this outcome measure are the results from data of combined DBTP and DBE periods.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: Total Number of T1 Gadolinium-positive (Gd+) LesionsFrom baseline to 176 weeksFull Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment.lesions per scanMEAN
SECONDARYDBTP and DBE Period: New or Enlarging T2 Lesions RateFrom baseline to 176 weeksFull Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment.lesions per yearMEAN
SECONDARYDBTP Period: Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration (NfL) at Week 12Week 12
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
nanogram per liter (ng/L)GEOMETRIC_MEAN

Results by group185

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Double Blind Treatment Period (DBTP) and Double Blind Extension (DBE) Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)Teriflunomide0.1395% Confidence Interval 0.11 to 0.15relapses per year
Double Blind Treatment Period (DBTP) and Double Blind Extension (DBE) Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)Evobrutinib0.1495% Confidence Interval 0.12 to 0.16relapses per year
Open Label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEsEvobrutinibParticipants with AEs1Participants
Open Label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEsEvobrutinibParticipants with Serious AEs0Participants
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)TeriflunomideWeek 9691.095% Confidence Interval 88.0 to 93.3percentage of participants
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)EvobrutinibWeek 9691.395% Confidence Interval 88.3 to 93.5percentage of participants
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)TeriflunomideWeek 15686.095% Confidence Interval 81.5 to 89.5percentage of participants
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 12-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)EvobrutinibWeek 15687.995% Confidence Interval 83.5 to 91.1percentage of participants
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 24-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)TeriflunomideWeek 9694.395% Confidence Interval 91.9 to 96.1percentage of participants
DBTP and DBE Period: Percentage of Participants Without 24-Week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)EvobrutinibWeek 9692.795% Confidence Interval 89.9 to 94.7percentage of participants

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-blind Treatment Period: 156 WeeksSTARTEDTeriflunomide564
Double-blind Treatment Period: 156 WeeksSTARTEDEvobrutinib560
Double-blind Treatment Period: 156 WeeksCOMPLETEDTeriflunomide396
Double-blind Treatment Period: 156 WeeksCOMPLETEDEvobrutinib384
Double-blind Treatment Period: 156 WeeksNOT COMPLETEDTeriflunomide168
Double-blind Treatment Period: 156 WeeksNOT COMPLETEDEvobrutinib176
Double-blind Extension: 96 WeeksSTARTEDTeriflunomide377
Double-blind Extension: 96 WeeksSTARTEDEvobrutinib359
Double-blind Extension: 96 WeeksCOMPLETEDTeriflunomide371
Double-blind Extension: 96 WeeksCOMPLETEDEvobrutinib346

Adverse events174

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTeriflunomide3956366
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEvobrutinib1355915
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTeriflunomide4156387
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEvobrutinib2055923
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTeriflunomide5356371
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEvobrutinib1555920
otherFatigueGeneral disordersTeriflunomide3256334
otherFatigueGeneral disordersEvobrutinib2955933
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsTeriflunomide108563117
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsEvobrutinib121559142

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTeriflunomide1563
Total, all-cause mortalityEvobrutinib1559
Total, other adverse eventsTeriflunomide409563
Total, other adverse eventsEvobrutinib361559
Total, serious adverse eventsTeriflunomide33563
Total, serious adverse eventsEvobrutinib45559

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39307151RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Teriflunomide vs Evobrutinib: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Teriflunomide vs Evobrutinib: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Symbol CodingSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04338022

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04338022/registered?page=2