ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04382326

20-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a 4-Dose Series in Healthy Infants

NCT04382326, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2023-12-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. 20-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a 4-Dose Series in Healthy Infants. Trials, record NCT04382326. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04382326

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
20-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a 4-Dose Series in Healthy Infants
NCT number
NCT04382326
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,997 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Pneumococcal Disease
Interventions
20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
First posted
2020-05-11
Last updated
2023-12-06
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-003305-10
Results first posted
2023-12-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes27

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1Within 7 days after Dose 1
Local reactions were recorded using an electronic diary. Local reactions included redness, swelling and pain at the injection site. Redness and swelling were graded as mild (0.5 to 2.0 cm), moderate (\>2.0 to 7.0 cm) and severe (\>7.0 cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (hurt if gently touched example, whimpered, winced, protested, or withdrew), moderate (hurt if gently touched, with crying), and severe (caused limitation of limb movement).
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Reaction Within 7 Days After Dose 2Within 7 Days After Dose 2
Local reactions were recorded using an electronic diary. Local reactions included redness, swelling and pain at the injection site. Redness and swelling were graded as mild (0.5 to 2.0 cm), moderate (\>2.0 to 7.0 cm) and severe (\>7.0 cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (hurt if gently touched example, whimpered, winced, protested, or withdrew), moderate (hurt if gently touched, with crying), and severe (caused limitation of limb movement).
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 3Within 7 days after Dose 3
Local reactions were recorded using an electronic diary. Local reactions included redness, swelling and pain at the injection site. Redness and swelling were graded as mild (0.5 to 2.0 cm), moderate (\>2.0 to 7.0 cm) and severe (\>7.0 cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (hurt if gently touched example, whimpered, winced, protested, or withdrew), moderate (hurt if gently touched, with crying), and severe (caused limitation of limb movement).
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 4Within 7 days after Dose 4
Local reactions were recorded using an electronic diary. Local reactions included redness, swelling and pain at the injection site. Redness and swelling were graded as mild (0.5 to 2.0 cm), moderate (\>2.0 to 7.0 cm) and severe (\>7.0 cm). Pain at injection site was graded as mild (hurt if gently touched example, whimpered, winced, protested, or withdrew), moderate (hurt if gently touched, with crying), and severe (caused limitation of limb movement). 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was based on Clopper and Pearson method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1Within 7 days after Dose 1
Systemic events included fever, decreased appetite, drowsiness/increased sleep and irritability, recorded by parents/legal guardians of participant's using an e-diary. Fever was defined as temperature greater than or equal to (\>=) 38.0 degrees Celsius (C) and categorized as \>=38.0 to 38.4 degrees C, \>38.4 to 38.9 degrees C, \>38.9 to 40.0 degrees C and \>40.0 degrees C. Decreased appetite was graded as mild (decreased interest in eating), moderate (decreased oral intake) and severe (refusal to feed). Drowsiness was graded as mild (increased or prolonged sleeping bouts), moderate (slightly subdued, interfered with daily activity) and severe (disabling, not interested in usual daily activity). Irritability was graded as mild (easily consolable), moderate (required increased attention) and severe (inconsolable, crying could not be comforted). 95% CI was based on Clopper and Pearson method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 2Within 7 days after Dose 2
Systemic events included fever, decreased appetite, drowsiness/increased sleep and irritability, recorded by parents/legal guardians of participant's using an e-diary. Fever was defined as temperature \>= 38.0 degrees C and categorized as \>=38.0 to 38.4 degrees C, \>38.4 to 38.9 degrees C, \>38.9 to 40.0 degrees C and \>40.0 degrees C. Decreased appetite was graded as mild (decreased interest in eating), moderate (decreased oral intake) and severe (refusal to feed). Drowsiness was graded as mild (increased or prolonged sleeping bouts), moderate (slightly subdued, interfered with daily activity) and severe (disabling, not interested in usual daily activity). Irritability was graded as mild (easily consolable), moderate (required increased attention) and severe (inconsolable, crying could not be comforted). 95% CI was based on Clopper and Pearson method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 3Within 7 days after Dose 3
Systemic events included fever, decreased appetite, drowsiness/increased sleep and irritability, recorded by parents/legal guardians of participant's using an e-diary. Fever was defined as temperature \>= 38.0 degrees C and categorized as \>=38.0 to 38.4 degrees C, \>38.4 to 38.9 degrees C, \>38.9 to 40.0 degrees C and \>40.0 degrees C. Decreased appetite was graded as mild (decreased interest in eating), moderate (decreased oral intake) and severe (refusal to feed). Drowsiness was graded as mild (increased or prolonged sleeping bouts), moderate (slightly subdued, interfered with daily activity) and severe (disabling, not interested in usual daily activity). Irritability was graded as mild (easily consolable), moderate (required increased attention) and severe (inconsolable, crying could not be comforted). 95% CI was based on Clopper and Pearson method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 4Within 7 days after Dose 4
Systemic events included fever, decreased appetite, drowsiness/increased sleep and irritability, recorded by parents/legal guardians of participant's using an e-diary. Fever was defined as temperature \>= 38.0 degrees C and categorized as \>=38.0 to 38.4 degrees C, \>38.4 to 38.9 degrees C, \>38.9 to 40.0 degrees C and \>40.0 degrees C. Decreased appetite was graded as mild (decreased interest in eating), moderate (decreased oral intake) and severe (refusal to feed). Drowsiness was graded as mild (increased or prolonged sleeping bouts), moderate (slightly subdued, interfered with daily activity) and severe (disabling, not interested in usual daily activity). Irritability was graded as mild (easily consolable), moderate (required increased attention) and severe (inconsolable, crying could not be comforted). 95% CI was based on Clopper and Pearson method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) From Dose 1 to 1 Month After Dose 3From Dose 1 to 1 Month after Dose 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participants, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. 95% CI was based on the Clopper and Pearson method. AEs reported in this outcome measure excluded local reactions and systemic events.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With AEs From Dose 4 to 1 Month After Dose 4From Dose 4 to 1 month after Dose 4
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. 95% CI was based on the Clopper and Pearson method. AEs reported in this outcome measure excluded local reactions and systemic events.

Outcomes27

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1Within 7 days after Dose 1
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the investigational product (IP) with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any electronic diary (e-diary) data reported after Dose 1.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Local Reaction Within 7 Days After Dose 2Within 7 Days After Dose 2
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the investigational product (IP) with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any electronic diary (e-diary) data reported after Dose 2.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 3Within 7 days after Dose 3
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the investigational product (IP) with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any electronic diary (e-diary) data reported after Dose 3.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 4Within 7 days after Dose 4
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the investigational product (IP) with safety follow up after any dose. Here, 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any electronic diary (e-diary) data reported after Dose 4.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1Within 7 days after Dose 1
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the IP with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any e-diary data reported after Dose 1.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 2Within 7 days after Dose 2
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the IP with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any e-diary data reported after Dose 2.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 3Within 7 days after Dose 3
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the IP with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any e-diary data reported after Dose 3.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 4Within 7 days after Dose 4
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the IP with safety follow up after any dose. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with any e-diary data reported after Dose 4.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) From Dose 1 to 1 Month After Dose 3From Dose 1 to 1 Month after Dose 3
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the IP with safety follow up after any dose. Here, 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants who received Dose 1.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With AEs From Dose 4 to 1 Month After Dose 4From Dose 4 to 1 month after Dose 4
Safety population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of the IP with safety follow up after any dose. Here, 'Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants who received Dose 4 and had safety follow up after Dose 4.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group638

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 120vPnCRedness: Any25.595% Confidence Interval 22.8 to 28.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 113vPnCRedness: Any24.695% Confidence Interval 22.0 to 27.5Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 120vPnCRedness: Mild21.595% Confidence Interval 18.9 to 24.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 113vPnCRedness: Mild22.395% Confidence Interval 19.7 to 25.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 120vPnCRedness: Moderate4.095% Confidence Interval 2.9 to 5.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 113vPnCRedness: Moderate2.495% Confidence Interval 1.5 to 3.5Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 120vPnCRedness: Severe095% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 0.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 113vPnCRedness: Severe095% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 0.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 120vPnCSwelling: Any16.495% Confidence Interval 14.2 to 18.9Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 113vPnCSwelling: Any18.895% Confidence Interval 16.4 to 21.4Percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED20vPnC1,001
Overall StudySTARTED13vPnC987
Overall StudyCOMPLETED20vPnC821
Overall StudyCOMPLETED13vPnC799
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED20vPnC180
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED13vPnC188

Adverse events114

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site erythema (REDNESS)General disorders20vPnC4981,001944
otherInjection site erythema (REDNESS)General disorders13vPnC492987986
otherInjection site pain (PAIN)General disorders20vPnC6891,0011,634
otherInjection site pain (PAIN)General disorders13vPnC6639871,543
otherInjection site swelling (SWELLING)General disorders20vPnC3531,001635
otherInjection site swelling (SWELLING)General disorders13vPnC359987707
otherPyrexia (FEVER)General disorders20vPnC3221,001550
otherPyrexia (FEVER)General disorders13vPnC314987504
otherOtitis mediaInfections and infestations20vPnC561,00173
otherOtitis mediaInfections and infestations13vPnC5098765

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality20vPnC01,001
Total, all-cause mortality13vPnC0987
Total, other adverse events20vPnC9661,001
Total, other adverse events13vPnC939987
Total, serious adverse events20vPnC451,001
Total, serious adverse events13vPnC31987

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37846456DERIVEDPubMed
38535409DERIVEDPubMed
41187484DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
20vPnC vs 13vPnC: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
20vPnC vs 13vPnC: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04382326

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04382326/registered?page=2