ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04385303

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis (STRIDES-1)

NCT04385303, Phase 3, Completed, Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc.; results first posted 2026-02-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis (STRIDES-1). Trials, record NCT04385303. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04385303

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Evaluating Lorecivivint (SM04690) for Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis (STRIDES-1)
NCT number
NCT04385303
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
496 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc.
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Lorecivivint, Placebo
First posted
2020-05-12
Last updated
2026-02-04
Results first posted
2026-02-04
Limitations and caveats
This trial was conducted during COVID-19 and its confounding effects on clinical outcomes in knee OA patients based on observational data have been reported (Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020;28(8):2435-43). Structural progression enrichment in the OA-11 trial, which enrolled concurrently, might have confounded short-term therapeutic pain detection; this hypothesis was evaluated in the post-hoc Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 only analysis.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly average of daily pain NRS at Week 12. The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly average of daily pain NRS at Week 24. The pain NRS is an 11-point scale \[0-10\] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by WOMAC Function subscore at Week 12. The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting.
SecondaryChange From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by WOMAC Function subscore at Week 24. The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting.
SecondaryChange From Baseline OA Disease Activity as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 12. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point \[0-10\] Numeric Rating Scale \[NRS\] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to \[0-100\], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad".
SecondaryChange From Baseline OA Disease Activity as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 24. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point \[0-10\] Numeric Rating Scale \[NRS\] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to \[0-100\], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad".

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who were randomized and received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who were randomized and received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who were randomized and received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who were randomized and received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline OA Disease Activity as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who were randomized and received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline OA Disease Activity as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who were randomized and received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
POST_HOCChange From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12 in Subjects With Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2Baseline and Week 12
The Per-Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS) includes FAS subjects who received the correct treatment, completed the study, and did not have any protocol deviations that might impact the evaluation of efficacy outcomes. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 only subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
POST_HOCChange From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24 in Subjects With Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2Baseline and Week 24
The Per-Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS) includes FAS subjects who received the correct treatment, completed the study, and did not have any protocol deviations that might impact the evaluation of efficacy outcomes. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 only subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
POST_HOC
Change From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 12 in Subjects With Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2
Baseline and Week 12
The Per-Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS) includes FAS subjects who received the correct treatment, completed the study, and did not have any protocol deviations that might impact the evaluation of efficacy outcomes. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 only subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
POST_HOC
Change From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 24 in Subjects With Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2
Baseline and Week 24
The Per-Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS) includes FAS subjects who received the correct treatment, completed the study, and did not have any protocol deviations that might impact the evaluation of efficacy outcomes. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 only subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized without imputation.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12Vehicle-2.15Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12Lorecivivint-2.22Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24Vehicle-2.31Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Pain in the Target Knee as Assessed by the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24Lorecivivint-2.26Standard Error 0.14units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 12Vehicle-22.00Standard Error 1.42units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 12Lorecivivint-20.29Standard Error 1.45units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 24Vehicle-21.91Standard Error 1.51units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Function in the Target Knee as Assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscore (WOMAC Function) at Week 24Lorecivivint-20.60Standard Error 1.55units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Disease Activity as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 12Vehicle-22.36Standard Error 1.52units on a scale
Change From Baseline OA Disease Activity as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment at Week 12Lorecivivint-23.19Standard Error 1.56units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle253
Overall StudySTARTEDLorecivivint243
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle233
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLorecivivint221
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle20
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLorecivivint22

Adverse events22

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsVehicle72519
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsLorecivivint924113
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsVehicle82518
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsLorecivivint72418
otherHypertensionVascular disordersVehicle32513
otherHypertensionVascular disordersLorecivivint72417
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle1425116
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersLorecivivint72417
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersVehicle52516
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersLorecivivint22412

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle1251
Total, all-cause mortalityLorecivivint0241
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle38251
Total, other adverse eventsLorecivivint27241
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle1251
Total, serious adverse eventsLorecivivint4241

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39495154DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lorecivivint vs Vehicle: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Lorecivivint vs Vehicle: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04385303

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04385303/results?page=2