ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04402047

Electroacupuncture vs Topical Diclofenac Sodium Gel for Patients With Hand Osteoarthritis

NCT04402047, Not applicable, Unknown, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Electroacupuncture vs Topical Diclofenac Sodium Gel for Patients With Hand Osteoarthritis. Trials, record NCT04402047. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04402047

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Electroacupuncture vs Topical Diclofenac Sodium Gel for Patients With Hand Osteoarthritis
NCT number
NCT04402047
Status
Unknown
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
108 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Conditions
Hand Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Electroacupuncture, Topical diclofenac sodium gel
First posted
2020-05-26
Last updated
2020-10-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in average overall finger joints pain intensity in the dominant hand over the past 48h from baseline to week 4at baseline and week 4Pain intensity will be measured using a 0-100 VAS, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating maximal pain.
SecondaryChange in average overall finger joints pain intensity in the dominant hand over the past 48h from baseline to weeks 8, 16at baseline,week 8 and week 16Pain intensity will be measured using a 0-100 VAS, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating maximal pain.
SecondaryThe proportion of participants achieving at least a 15-point reduction in average overall finger joints pain intensity in the dominant hand from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16at week 4, week 8 and week 16
SecondaryChange in Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) total score, and pain, stiffness and physical function subscales from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16at baseline,week 4, week 8 and week 16
The AUSCAN index contains a 15-item scale referring to hand pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item), and function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours, which is valid, reliable and responsive in patients with hand OA. All items are scaled on a 0-100 VAS (0=none to 100= very severe), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms/function.
SecondaryChange in Functional Index for HOA (FIHOA) from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16at baseline,week 4, week 8 and week 16
The FIHOA is a patient-reported hand function questionnaire, comprising 10 items with a four-point Likert scale, in which 0 represents "possible without difficulty", 1 indicates "possible with slight difficulty", 2 represents "possible with important difficulty" and 3 indicates "impossible"
SecondaryChange in the number of self-reported painful joints and painful joints at digital pressure from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16at baseline,week 4, week 8 and week 16All finger joints will be reported spontaneously for the presence of pain by the participants, and examined by a trained research nurse for the presence of pain at digital pressure.
SecondaryChange in the number of swollen joints from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16:at baseline,week 4, week 8 and week 16All soft swollen finger joints count (0-30) will be assessed by a trained research nurse at each study visit.
SecondaryChange in hand grip strength and pinch strength of the fingers from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16:at baseline,week 4, week 8 and week 16Hand grip strength and pinch strength of the fingers of the dominant hand will be tested using a hand dynamometer and a Jamar digital pinch gauge respectively.
SecondaryChange in patient global assessment of improvement from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16at baseline,week 4, week 8 and week 16
The patients will be asked to respond to the question 'Considering all the ways your hand OA affects you, how have you been during the last 48 h?' on a self-administered 0-100 VAS (0, worst possible, to 100, best possible, in 10-point increments)
Secondary
The proportion of responder according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatological Clinical Trials (OMERACT) and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) responder criteria at weeks 4,8 and 16
at week 4, week 8 and week 16
The OMERACT-OARSI response is defined as an improvement in either pain (0-100 overall finger joints pain) or function (0-36 AUSCAN physical function) with ≥50% (relative) and ≥20/100 (absolute); or if the improvement is ≥20% (relative) and ≥10/100 (absolute) in ≥2 of the following: pain, functioning and patient global assessment of improvement.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35413861DERIVEDPubMed
42201269DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04402047

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04402047/registered