ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04410991

Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib (SAR442168) (GEMINI 2)

NCT04410991, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2025-06-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib (SAR442168) (GEMINI 2). Trials, record NCT04410991. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04410991

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib (SAR442168) (GEMINI 2)
NCT number
NCT04410991
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
899 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Conditions
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
Tolebrutinib, Teriflunomide HMR1726, Placebo to match Tolebrutinib, Placebo to match Teriflunomide
First posted
2020-06-01
Last updated
2025-07-02
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-000644-55
Results first posted
2025-06-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated RelapsesBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as a monophasic, acute or subacute onset of new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination. Symptoms were attributable to MS, lasted for \>=24 hours with or without recovery, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability.
SecondaryTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 6-month CDW was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a confirmed, sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.5 points when the baseline score was 0, of \>=1.0 point when the baseline score was 0.5 to \<=5.5, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.5) over at least 6 months that was not attributable to another etiology.
SecondaryTime to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 3-month CDW was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a confirmed, sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.5 points when the baseline score was 0, of \>=1.0 point when the baseline score was 0.5 to \<=5.5, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.5) over at least 3 months that was not attributable to another etiology.
SecondaryMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per YearBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to identify number of new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions starting from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.
SecondaryMean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per ScanBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
MRI of the brain was performed to identify number of new Gd-enhancing T1-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new Gd- enhancing T1-hyperintense lesions starting from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
The SDMT was used to assess processing speed, divided attention, visual scanning, tracking and motor speed. It involved a simple substitution task using a reference key. The number of correct substitutions and number of items completed within a 90 second interval (maximum 110 seconds) were recorded. A decrease of 4 points from baseline on the SDMT was considered meaningful worsening. The score was the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicating a better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
The CVLT-II was a verbal learning and memory test consisting of recall and recognition of a list of 16 words. For each assessment, 5 trials were completed. Total Correct Recall Trials 1-5 was scaled to a normalized T-score metric, which had a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, the maximum possible score was 80 and a minimum was 0. Higher values indicated improved cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
SecondaryTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. CDI was defined as a decrease of \>=1 point from baseline in the EDSS score lasting at least 6 months.
SecondaryPercent Change in Brain Volume Loss at EOS Compared to Month 6Month 6 to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)MRI of the brain was performed at the specified timepoints to detect the changes in brain volume loss.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
MSQoL-54 was standardized instrument comprising generic and MS-specific items. This 54-item instrument generated 12 subscales and 2 single-item measures (satisfaction with sexual function \[1 item\]; change in health \[1 item\]). 12 subscales were: a: physical health (10 items), b: health perceptions (5 items), c: energy (5 items), d: role limit physical (4 items), e: sexual function (4 items), f: pain (3 items), g: social function (3 items), h: health distress (4 items), i: overall quality of life (2 items), j: emotional well-being (5 items), k: role limitations emotional (3 items) and l: cognitive function (4 items). Physical and mental health composite score were calculated as weighted sum of 'a to h' and 'i to l' subscales respectively. Each composite score was transformed linearly to common 0 (worst) to 100 (best) score range; higher score indicated improved quality of life. Baseline was defined as last available value prior to first dose of study intervention.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated RelapsesBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 monthsThe intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.relapses per participant yearNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 monthsThe ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 monthsThe ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per YearBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 monthsThe ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.number of new and/or enlarging T2lesionsMEAN
SECONDARYMean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per ScanBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 monthsThe ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.number of new Gd-enhancing T1 lesionsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
T-scoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 monthsThe ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Brain Volume Loss at EOS Compared to Month 6Month 6 to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints for the specified categories are reported.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group38

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated RelapsesTeriflunomide 14 mg0.10995% Confidence Interval 0.088 to 0.134relapses per participant year
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated RelapsesTolebrutinib 60 mg0.10895% Confidence Interval 0.089 to 0.131relapses per participant year
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleTeriflunomide 14 mg12.14Full Range 1.4 to 38.9months
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleTolebrutinib 60 mg15.12Full Range 2.0 to 37.1months
Time to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleTeriflunomide 14 mg12.11Full Range 1.4 to 39.1months
Time to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleTolebrutinib 60 mg12.11Full Range 2.0 to 42.1months
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per YearTeriflunomide 14 mg4.36995% Confidence Interval 3.587 to 5.322number of new and/or enlarging T2lesions
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per YearTolebrutinib 60 mg5.09295% Confidence Interval 4.340 to 5.975number of new and/or enlarging T2lesions
Mean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per ScanTeriflunomide 14 mg0.21795% Confidence Interval 0.169 to 0.280number of new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions
Mean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per ScanTolebrutinib 60 mg0.46095% Confidence Interval 0.365 to 0.581number of new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTeriflunomide 14 mg452
Overall StudySTARTEDTolebrutinib 60 mg447
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedTeriflunomide 14 mg451
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedTolebrutinib 60 mg447
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTeriflunomide 14 mg378
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTolebrutinib 60 mg384
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTeriflunomide 14 mg74
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTolebrutinib 60 mg63

Adverse events192

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsTeriflunomide 14 mg115451131
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsTolebrutinib 60 mg106447126
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsTeriflunomide 14 mg2545135
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsTolebrutinib 60 mg2744733
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsTeriflunomide 14 mg6445197
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsTolebrutinib 60 mg60447102
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsTeriflunomide 14 mg3645149
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsTolebrutinib 60 mg3144743
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsTeriflunomide 14 mg3045143
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsTolebrutinib 60 mg2544735

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTeriflunomide 14 mg2452
Total, all-cause mortalityTolebrutinib 60 mg1447
Total, other adverse eventsTeriflunomide 14 mg313451
Total, other adverse eventsTolebrutinib 60 mg279447
Total, serious adverse eventsTeriflunomide 14 mg37451
Total, serious adverse eventsTolebrutinib 60 mg49447

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
40202623DERIVEDPubMed
42546561DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Symbol CodingSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04410991

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04410991/results?page=2