ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04423718

Study of the Effects of High Dose Aflibercept Injected Into the Eye of Patients With an Age-related Disorder That Causes Loss of Vision Due to Growth of Abnormal Blood Vessels at the Back of the Eye

NCT04423718, Phase 3, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2023-09-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of the Effects of High Dose Aflibercept Injected Into the Eye of Patients With an Age-related Disorder That Causes Loss of Vision Due to Growth of Abnormal Blood Vessels at the Back of the Eye. Trials, record NCT04423718. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04423718

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of the Effects of High Dose Aflibercept Injected Into the Eye of Patients With an Age-related Disorder That Causes Loss of Vision Due to Growth of Abnormal Blood Vessels at the Back of the Eye
NCT number
NCT04423718
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,011 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Interventions
Aflibercept High Dose VEGF Trap-Eye (BAY86-5321), Aflibercept VEGF Trap-Eye (Eylea, BAY86-5321)
First posted
2020-06-09
Last updated
2025-08-29
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2019-003851-12
Results first posted
2023-09-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 48At baseline and Week 48Visual function of the study eye was assessed at a distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS BCVA letter score. BCVA scale range is 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 60At baseline and Week 60Visual function of the study eye was assessed at a distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS BCVA letter score. BCVA scale range is 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in Central Subfield at Week 16At Week 16
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline at Week 48At baseline and Week 48
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving an ETDRS Letter Score of at Least 69 (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Equivalent) at Week 48At Week 48
SecondaryChange in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Size From Baseline to Week 48At baseline and Week 48
SecondaryChange in Total Lesion Area From Baseline to Week 48At baseline and Week 48
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in the Center Subfield at Week 48At Week 48
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) at Week 48At baseline and Week 48
SecondaryChange From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) Total Score at Week 48At baseline and Week 48NEI VFQ-25 was a 25-item questionnaire that gave a score on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best = no vision problems)

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 48At baseline and Week 48Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Estimand mainly based on hypothetical strategy.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 60At baseline and Week 60Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Estimand mainly based on hypothetical strategy.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in Central Subfield at Week 16At Week 16
Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Estimand mainly based on hypothetical strategy.~The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in the Overall Number of Baseline Participants due to missing assessment at the respective visit. These participants with missing assessments were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Gaining at Least 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline at Week 48At baseline and Week 48
Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.~The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in the Overall Number of Baseline Participants due to 1 participant per each treatment group with no post-baseline BCVA. These participants with missing assessments were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an ETDRS Letter Score of at Least 69 (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Equivalent) at Week 48At Week 48
Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.~The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in the Overall Number of Baseline Participants due to 1 participant per each treatment group with no post-baseline BCVA. These participants with missing assessments were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Size From Baseline to Week 48At baseline and Week 48Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.mm^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Total Lesion Area From Baseline to Week 48At baseline and Week 48Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.mm^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in the Center Subfield at Week 48At Week 48
Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.~The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in the Overall Number of Baseline Participants due to missing assessments at the respective visit. These participants with missing assessments were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) at Week 48At baseline and Week 48Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.µmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) Total Score at Week 48At baseline and Week 48Full analysis set: included all participants who had been randomly assigned to study treatment and who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group58

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 48Aflibercept 2q87.03Standard Error 0.74scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 48Aflibercept HDq126.06Standard Error 0.77scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 48Aflibercept HDq165.89Standard Error 0.72scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 60Aflibercept 2q87.23Standard Error 0.68scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 60Aflibercept HDq126.37Standard Error 0.74scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in BCVA Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score at Week 60Aflibercept HDq166.31Standard Error 0.66scores on a scale
Percentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in Central Subfield at Week 16Aflibercept 2q851.6Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in Central Subfield at Week 16Aflibercept HDq1261.6Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in Central Subfield at Week 16Aflibercept HDq1665.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and no Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in Central Subfield at Week 16All Aflibercept HD63.3Percentage of participants

Participant flow21

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Main StudySTARTEDAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0-96) / HD (up to Week 156)336
Main StudySTARTEDAflibercep HDq12 (Week 0-156)335
Main StudySTARTEDAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0-156)338
Main StudyCOMPLETEDAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0-96) / HD (up to Week 156)286
Main StudyCOMPLETEDAflibercep HDq12 (Week 0-156)291
Main StudyCOMPLETEDAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0-156)292
Main StudyNOT COMPLETEDAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0-96) / HD (up to Week 156)50
Main StudyNOT COMPLETEDAflibercep HDq12 (Week 0-156)44
Main StudyNOT COMPLETEDAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0-156)46
Extension PhaseSTARTEDAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0-96) / HD (up to Week 156)208

Adverse events1,944

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0- 96)2233622
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept HDq12 (Week 0- 96)2933529
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0- 96)3233833
otherCataractEye disordersAll Aflibercept HD (Week 0- 96)6167362
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept 2q8/HD (Week 0- 156)2720829
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept HDq12 (Week 0- 156)3421037
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0- 156)3320735
otherCataractEye disordersAll Aflibercept HD (Week 0- 156)6741772
otherRetinal haemorrhageEye disordersAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0- 96)1933621
otherRetinal haemorrhageEye disordersAflibercept HDq12 (Week 0- 96)1633516

Adverse event totals24

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0- 96)12336
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept HDq12 (Week 0- 96)11335
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0- 96)7338
Total, all-cause mortalityAll Aflibercept HD (Week 0- 96)18673
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept 2q8/HD (Week 0- 156)4208
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept HDq12 (Week 0- 156)7210
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept HDq16 (Week 0- 156)2207
Total, all-cause mortalityAll Aflibercept HD (Week 0- 156)9417
Total, other adverse eventsAflibercept 2q8 (Week 0- 96)179336
Total, other adverse eventsAflibercept HDq12 (Week 0- 96)163335

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
38461841DERIVEDPubMed
40876598DERIVEDPubMed
41411005DERIVEDPubMed
41519383DERIVEDPubMed
42287526DERIVEDPubMed
42363252DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04423718

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04423718/results?page=2