ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04424927

PRV-015 in Gluten-free Diet Non-responsive Celiac Disease

NCT04424927, Phase 2, Completed, Provention Bio, a Sanofi Company; results first posted 2025-10-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. PRV-015 in Gluten-free Diet Non-responsive Celiac Disease. Trials, record NCT04424927. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04424927

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
PRV-015 in Gluten-free Diet Non-responsive Celiac Disease
NCT number
NCT04424927
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
388 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Provention Bio, a Sanofi Company
Conditions
Celiac Disease
Interventions
PRV-015, Placebo
First posted
2020-06-11
Last updated
2025-10-20
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-000649-16
Results first posted
2025-10-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Abdominal Symptoms Domain Score Through Week 24Baseline (average of Day -7 to Day -1) up to Week 24
The CeD PRO questionnaire was captured daily in the eDiary. The questionnaire included 9 items: abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, gas, diarrhea, loose stool, nausea, headache and tiredness. Participants were asked to rate their symptom severity on an 11-point scale and scores range from 0 (not experiencing the symptom) to 10 (the worst possible symptom experience). Abdominal Symptoms domain included abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, bloating and gas. Total score for abdominal symptoms domain range from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Baseline abdominal symptoms domain score was defined as the average of the daily scores for the last week of the placebo run-in period.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Diarrhea and Loose Stool Domain Score Through Week 24Baseline (average of Day -7 to Day -1) up to Week 24
The CeD PRO questionnaire was captured daily in the eDiary. The questionnaire included 9 items: abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, gas, diarrhea, loose stool, nausea, headache and tiredness. Participants were asked to rate their symptom severity on an 11-point scale and scores range from 0 (not experiencing the symptom) to 10 (the worst possible symptom experience). Diarrhea and loose stool domain included diarrhea and loose stool. Total score for diarrhea and loose stool domain range from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Baseline diarrhea and loose stool domain score was defined as the average of the daily scores for the last week of the placebo run-in period.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Total Gastrointestinal (GI) Score Through Week 24Baseline (average of Day -7 to Day -1) up to Week 24
The CeD PRO questionnaire was captured daily in the eDiary. The questionnaire included 9 items: abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, gas, diarrhea, loose stool, nausea, headache and tiredness. Participants were asked to rate their symptom severity on an 11-point scale and scores range from 0 (not experiencing the symptom) to 10 (the worst possible symptom experience). Total GI domain included abdominal symptoms domain, diarrhea, loose stool and nausea. Total GI score range from 0 to 70. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Baseline GI score was defined as the average of the daily scores for the last week of the placebo run-in period.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte (IEL) Density at Week 24Baseline to Week 24
The small intestinal mucosal inflammation was measured by IEL density using immunohistochemistry. Baseline was defined as IEL density from the esophagogastroduodenoscopy biopsy conducted during the run-in period.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)From first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 days
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE was defined as any AE that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. AESIs included severe opportunistic infections and hypersensitivity reactions of at least moderate severity. A TEAE was defined as an AE that occurred from the first dose of post-randomization study drug administration through the end of the study.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in HematologyFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysBlood samples were collected to determine the hematology laboratory important changes. CHG= Change from baseline hemoglobin.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Clinical ChemistryFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysBlood samples were collected to determine the clinical chemistry laboratory important changes. ULN= Upper limit of normal, mmol/L= millimoles per liter and mcmol/L= micromoles per liter.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in UrinalysisFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysUrine samples were collected to determine the important changes in urine. TNTC= Too numerous to count, LPF= Low power field and HPF= High power field.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Vital Signs and Body WeightFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 days
Participant's vital signs and body weight were examined to determine the important changes. Vital signs included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate. mmHg= millimeters of mercury, DFB= Decrease from baseline and IFB= Increase from baseline.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-PRV-015 AntibodiesBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24 and 28Blood samples were collected to determine the presence of anti-drug antibodies by immunoassay.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAbsolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Abdominal Symptoms Domain Score Through Week 24Baseline (average of Day -7 to Day -1) up to Week 24
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and up to Week 24 are reported.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Diarrhea and Loose Stool Domain Score Through Week 24Baseline (average of Day -7 to Day -1) up to Week 24The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and up to Week 24 are reported.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Total Gastrointestinal (GI) Score Through Week 24Baseline (average of Day -7 to Day -1) up to Week 24The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and up to Week 24 are reported.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte (IEL) Density at Week 24Baseline to Week 24The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and Week 24 are reported.cells/100 epithelial cellsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)From first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysThe Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug post-randomization.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in HematologyFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysThe Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug post-randomization. Only participants with data collected are reported.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Clinical ChemistryFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysThe Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug post-randomization. Only participants with data collected are reported.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in UrinalysisFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysThe Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug post-randomization. Only participants with data collected for each specific parameter are reported.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Vital Signs and Body WeightFrom first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose administration, 197 daysThe Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug post-randomization.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Anti-PRV-015 AntibodiesBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24 and 28
The Immunogenicity analysis set included participants who were randomized, dosed, and had at least 1 evaluable immunogenicity assessment. Only participants with data collected at specific time point are reported.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group183

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Abdominal Symptoms Domain Score Through Week 24Placebo-1.3295% Confidence Interval -1.66 to -0.98score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Abdominal Symptoms Domain Score Through Week 24PRV-015 100 mg-1.2895% Confidence Interval -1.62 to -0.94score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Abdominal Symptoms Domain Score Through Week 24PRV-015 300 mg-1.2195% Confidence Interval -1.55 to -0.88score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Abdominal Symptoms Domain Score Through Week 24PRV-015 600 mg-1.2895% Confidence Interval -1.63 to -0.93score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Diarrhea and Loose Stool Domain Score Through Week 24Placebo-0.7795% Confidence Interval -1.15 to -0.40score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Diarrhea and Loose Stool Domain Score Through Week 24PRV-015 100 mg-0.6695% Confidence Interval -1.04 to -0.28score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Diarrhea and Loose Stool Domain Score Through Week 24PRV-015 300 mg-1.0295% Confidence Interval -1.39 to -0.64score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Diarrhea and Loose Stool Domain Score Through Week 24PRV-015 600 mg-1.0795% Confidence Interval -1.46 to -0.68score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Total Gastrointestinal (GI) Score Through Week 24Placebo-0.8995% Confidence Interval -1.15 to -0.63score on a scale
Absolute Change From Baseline in Celiac Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Total Gastrointestinal (GI) Score Through Week 24PRV-015 100 mg-0.8495% Confidence Interval -1.10 to -0.57score on a scale

Participant flow40

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)STARTEDSingle-blind: Placebo388
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)STARTEDDouble-blind: Placebo0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)STARTEDDouble-blind: PRV-015 100 mg0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)STARTEDDouble-blind: PRV-015 300 mg0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)STARTEDDouble-blind: PRV-015 600 mg0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)Received TreatmentSingle-blind: Placebo387
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)Received TreatmentDouble-blind: Placebo0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)Received TreatmentDouble-blind: PRV-015 100 mg0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)Received TreatmentDouble-blind: PRV-015 300 mg0
Single-blind Period (4 Weeks)Received TreatmentDouble-blind: PRV-015 600 mg0

Adverse events85

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsSingle-blind: Placebo03870
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsDouble-blind: Placebo3573
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsDouble-blind: PRV-015 100 mg5565
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsDouble-blind: PRV-015 300 mg8578
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsDouble-blind: PRV-015 600 mg5545
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsSingle-blind: Placebo03870
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsDouble-blind: Placebo5576
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsDouble-blind: PRV-015 100 mg3565
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsDouble-blind: PRV-015 300 mg4574
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsDouble-blind: PRV-015 600 mg4544

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySingle-blind: Placebo0387
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blind: Placebo057
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blind: PRV-015 100 mg056
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blind: PRV-015 300 mg057
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blind: PRV-015 600 mg054
Total, other adverse eventsSingle-blind: Placebo0387
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blind: Placebo2257
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blind: PRV-015 100 mg1856
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blind: PRV-015 300 mg2257
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blind: PRV-015 600 mg1954

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41039829DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04424927

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04424927/results?page=2