ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04432376

Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Oil Versus Vehicle on Fungal Infection of the Ear Canal (Otomycosis)

NCT04432376, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2022-11-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Oil Versus Vehicle on Fungal Infection of the Ear Canal (Otomycosis). Trials, record NCT04432376. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04432376

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Oil Versus Vehicle on Fungal Infection of the Ear Canal (Otomycosis)
NCT number
NCT04432376
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
382 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Otomycosis
Interventions
miconazole 2% oil, vehicle oil
First posted
2020-06-16
Last updated
2024-01-19
Results first posted
2022-11-04
Limitations and caveats
The limited number of patients with otomycosis at any one time, and the lack of standardized FDA-approved clinical studies on otomycosis have proven to be challenging and difficult to assign predetermined analysis endpoints. This is in line with the challenges described in the FDA Accelerating Rare disease Cures Program, such as challenges faced when using well-established trial designs, and complexities in endpoint selection when there is limited information or understanding of the disease.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Therapeutic Cure21 days from first day of drug application
"therapeutic cure" is "mycological cure" plus "clinical cure, in the Modified intent to treat (MITT) only: patients with + fungal culture at baseline. Fungal culture results verified as (+) or (-) after enrollment. Intent to treat (ITT) population were all subjects enrolled and randomized. Active group: ITT=89 (100%), MITT=67 (75.3%); Placebo Group: ITT=90 (100%), MITT=64 (71.1%). Mycological cure is a negative mycological culture (culture is either positive or negative). Score=0 is best. Clinical cure is absence of all otomycosis signs and symptoms (s/s) of Pruritus, Debris, and Aural fullness, graded as (scores) 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe; and Presence of fungal elements, score 0=No fungal elements, 1=fungal elements present on visual inspection. Score=0 is best. Efficacy analysis was performed only on MITT (modified intent-to-treat) population, consisting of only those patients that had positive fungal culture at Baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Mycological Cure21 days from first day of drug application
Mycological cure is a negative mycological culture for the study ear at test of cure visit, in Modified intent to treat (MITT) only: patients with + fungal culture at baseline. Subjects that had negative fungal culture at Baseline were not included in MITT. Fungal culture results verified as (+) or (-) after enrollment. Grading is based on positive or negative mycological (fungal) culture. Negative culture is required. Efficacy analysis was performed only on MITT (modified intent-to-treat) population, consisting of only those patients that had positive fungal culture at Baseline. Intent to treat (ITT) population were all subjects enrolled and randomized. Active group: ITT=89 (100%), MITT=67 (75.3%); Placebo Group: ITT=90 (100%), MITT=64 (71.1%).
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Clinical Cure21 days from first day of drug application
Absence of all otomycosis signs and symptoms according to the scales for each individual sign/symptom. Score=0 is best. Clinical cure is absence of all otomycosis signs and symptoms of Pruritus, Debris, and Aural fullness, graded as (scores) 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe; and Presence of fungal elements, score 0=No fungal elements, 1=fungal elements present on visual inspection. Score=0 is best. Efficacy analysis was performed only on MITT (modified intent-to-treat) population, consisting of only those patients that had positive fungal culture at Baseline. Subjects that had negative fungal culture at Baseline were not included in MITT. Fungal culture results verified as (+) or (-) after enrollment. ITT (intent to treat) population were all subjects enrolled and randomized. Active group: ITT=89 (100%), MITT=67 (75.3%); Placebo Group: ITT=90 (100%), MITT=64 (71.1%).

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Subjects With Therapeutic Cure21 days from first day of drug application
MITT (modified intent-to-treat) population - only patients with positive mycological culture at Baseline. ITT (intent-to-treat) population were all subjects enrolled and randomized. Active group: ITT=89 (100%), MITT=67 (75.3%); Placebo Group: ITT=90 (100%), MITT=64 (71.1%).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Mycological Cure21 days from first day of drug application
MITT (modified intent-to-treat) population - only patients with positive mycological culture at Baseline. ITT population were all subjects enrolled and randomized. Active group: ITT=89 (100%), MITT=67 (75.3%); Placebo Group: ITT=90 (100%), MITT=64 (71.1%).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Clinical Cure21 days from first day of drug application
MITT (modified intent-to-treat) population - only patients with positive mycological culture at Baseline. ITT population were all subjects enrolled and randomized. Active group: ITT=89 (100%), MITT=67 (75.3%); Placebo Group: ITT=90 (100%), MITT=64 (71.1%).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Subjects With Therapeutic CureActive Treatment ArmAchieved Therapeutic cure (Score=0 fungal culture and clinical signs,symptoms)14Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Therapeutic CurePlacebo Treatment ArmAchieved Therapeutic cure (Score=0 fungal culture and clinical signs,symptoms)11Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Therapeutic CureActive Treatment ArmNot Achieve Therapeutic cure (Positive fungal culture AND/OR clinical score 1 or greater each s/s53Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Therapeutic CurePlacebo Treatment ArmNot Achieve Therapeutic cure (Positive fungal culture AND/OR clinical score 1 or greater each s/s53Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Mycological CureActive Treatment ArmAchieved mycological cure (negative fungal culture)24Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Mycological CurePlacebo Treatment ArmAchieved mycological cure (negative fungal culture)15Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Mycological CureActive Treatment ArmNot achieved mycological cure (positive fungal culture)43Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Mycological CurePlacebo Treatment ArmNot achieved mycological cure (positive fungal culture)49Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical CureActive Treatment ArmAchieved clinical cure (score = 0 for all signs, symptoms)22Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical CurePlacebo Treatment ArmAchieved clinical cure (score = 0 for all signs, symptoms)14Participants

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-blind Treatment PeriodSTARTEDActive Treatment Arm89
Double-blind Treatment PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo Treatment Arm90
Double-blind Treatment PeriodSTARTEDOpen-label Application Group0
Double-blind Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDActive Treatment Arm84
Double-blind Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo Treatment Arm79
Double-blind Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDOpen-label Application Group0
Double-blind Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDActive Treatment Arm5
Double-blind Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Treatment Arm11
Double-blind Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDOpen-label Application Group0
Enrollment B, Open Label Safety Group.STARTEDActive Treatment Arm0

Adverse events75

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherear discomfortEar and labyrinth disordersActive Treatment Arm8898
otherear discomfortEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo Treatment Arm9909
otherear discomfortEar and labyrinth disordersOpen-label Treatment Arm02030
othervertigoEar and labyrinth disordersActive Treatment Arm2892
othervertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo Treatment Arm0900
othervertigoEar and labyrinth disordersOpen-label Treatment Arm12031
othertinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersActive Treatment Arm0890
othertinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo Treatment Arm1901
othertinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersOpen-label Treatment Arm02030
othertympanic membrane perforationEar and labyrinth disordersActive Treatment Arm0890

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityActive Treatment Arm089
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Treatment Arm090
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-label Treatment Arm0203
Total, other adverse eventsActive Treatment Arm4189
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Treatment Arm5190
Total, other adverse eventsOpen-label Treatment Arm9203
Total, serious adverse eventsActive Treatment Arm189
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Treatment Arm090
Total, serious adverse eventsOpen-label Treatment Arm0203

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04432376

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04432376/events?page=2