ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04496167

Safety and Efficacy of EN3835 in Participants With Frozen Shoulder

NCT04496167, Phase 2, Completed, Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company; results first posted 2023-09-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of EN3835 in Participants With Frozen Shoulder. Trials, record NCT04496167. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04496167

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of EN3835 in Participants With Frozen Shoulder
NCT number
NCT04496167
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
198 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company
Conditions
Adhesive Capsulitis, Frozen Shoulder
Interventions
EN3835, Placebo
First posted
2020-08-03
Last updated
2023-09-13
Results first posted
2023-09-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes31

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Adapted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Composite Score for the Affected Shoulder at Day 95Baseline, Day 95
Adapted ASES is a self-administered participant reported outcome measure, divided into 2 sections: pain and function. Pain subscale is a single item, 11-point numeric rating scale, ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain), calculated as 10 - pain raw score and multiplying by 5, score ranging from 0 (worst pain) to 50 (no pain). Function subscale consists of 10 activities, 4-point ordinal scale about their ability to do the activity with the affected arm, ranging from 0 (unable to do) to 3 (not difficult), calculated by multiplying total score for 10 items by 5 and then dividing it by 3, score range of 0 (no function) to 50 (full function). Adapted ASES composite score is the sum of the pain subscale score (50% of the composite score) and function subscale score (50% of the composite score), score range of 0 (worst pain) to 100 (least pain). Positive change from Baseline score means an improvement in pain and/or shoulder function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95PROM for forward flexion was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95PROM for internal rotation was measured using a goniometer and a spinal level. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for External Rotation in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95PROM for external rotation was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for Abduction in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95PROM for abduction was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for Shoulder Extension in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95PROM for shoulder extension was measured using a goniometer. Positive change from Baseline means an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for Forward Flexion in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
PROM for forward flexion was measured using a goniometer. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95. Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder Change from baseline was calculated as: (Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
PROM for internal rotation was measured using a goniometer and a spinal level. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95. Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder Change from baseline was calculated as: (Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for External Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
PROM for external rotation was measured using a goniometer PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95. Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder Change from baseline was calculated as: (Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PROM for Abduction in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
PROM for abduction was measured using a goniometer. PROM measurements for the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder were taken at Baseline. PROM measurements of the affected shoulder were take at Baseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95. Baseline Value = Measurement at Baseline in Affected Shoulder- Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Unaffected Shoulder Change from baseline was calculated as: (Measurement at Visit in Affected Shoulder - Measurement at Baseline Contralateral Shoulder) - Baseline Value

Outcomes31

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Adapted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Composite Score for the Affected Shoulder at Day 95Baseline, Day 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment and had both Baseline and Day 95 measurements. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for External Rotation in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for Abduction in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for Shoulder Extension in the Affected ShoulderBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for Forward Flexion in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for Internal Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for External Rotation in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PROM for Abduction in the Affected Shoulder Compared to the Contralateral (Unaffected) Shoulder at BaselineBaseline, Days 22, 43, 64, and 95
Modified intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study treatment and who had a valid baseline adapted ASES composite score in the affected shoulder and at least 1 valid adapted ASES composite score after the injection of the study treatment. Here, number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified time-point (had both Baseline and measurements at specified timepoints).
degreesMEAN

Results by group238

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Adapted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Composite Score for the Affected Shoulder at Day 95EN383541.35Standard Deviation 22.432score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Adapted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Composite Score for the Affected Shoulder at Day 95Placebo41.16Standard Deviation 21.942score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderEN3835Day 2219.1Standard Deviation 24.88degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderPlaceboDay 2213.9Standard Deviation 22.40degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderEN3835Day 4325.6Standard Deviation 26.89degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderPlaceboDay 4321.4Standard Deviation 20.14degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderEN3835Day 6431.4Standard Deviation 26.31degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderPlaceboDay 6427.3Standard Deviation 23.68degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderEN3835Day 9532.8Standard Deviation 25.59degrees
Change From Baseline in Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for Forward Flexion in the Affected ShoulderPlaceboDay 9529.7Standard Deviation 27.08degrees

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEN3835102
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo96
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugEN3835101
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo94
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEN383584
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo80
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEN383518
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo16

Adverse events12

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site bruisingGeneral disordersEN383547101
otherInjection site bruisingGeneral disordersPlacebo494
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersEN383523101
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersPlacebo1094
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersEN383523101
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo1294
otherInjection site swellingGeneral disordersEN383514101
otherInjection site swellingGeneral disordersPlacebo294
seriousDepressionPsychiatric disordersEN38351101
seriousDepressionPsychiatric disordersPlacebo094

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEN38350101
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo094
Total, other adverse eventsEN383569101
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2294
Total, serious adverse eventsEN38351101
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo194

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
EN3835 vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
EN3835 vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04496167

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04496167/registered?page=2