ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04525885

A Study of Gefapixant (MK-7264) in Adult Participants With Chronic Cough (MK-7264-030)-China Extension

NCT04525885, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2023-10-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Gefapixant (MK-7264) in Adult Participants With Chronic Cough (MK-7264-030)-China Extension. Trials, record NCT04525885. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04525885

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Gefapixant (MK-7264) in Adult Participants With Chronic Cough (MK-7264-030)-China Extension
NCT number
NCT04525885
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
161 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Chronic Cough
Interventions
Gefapixant 45 mg twice daily (BID), Gefapixant 15 mg BID, Placebo, Gefapixant 45 mg BID
First posted
2020-08-25
Last updated
2024-01-12
Results first posted
2023-10-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryModel-Based Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 24-Hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
24-hour coughs per hour was defined as the average hourly cough frequency based on 24-hour sound recordings using a digital recording device (cough monitor). A longitudinal analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was applied to log-transformed cough data to determine geometric mean (GM) 24-hour coughs per hour at baseline and week 24. The GMR (Week 24 GM 24-hour coughs per hour divided by Baseline GM 24-hour coughs per hour) is reported.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) During Treatment and Follow-upUp to 54 weeksAssessment of participants who have at least one AE during the main study period (24 weeks), the treatment extension period (28 weeks), and during 2 weeks of follow-up by telephone.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AEUp 52 weeksAssessment of participants who stop study treatment due to an AE during the main study period (24 weeks) or the treatment extension period (28 weeks).
SecondaryModel-Based GMR of Awake Coughs Per Hour at Week 24/BaselineBaseline, Week 24
Awake coughs per hour was defined as the average hourly cough frequency while the participant is awake, based on a 24-hour interval of sound recordings using a digital recording device (cough monitor). ANCOVA model was applied to log-transformed cough data to determine GM of awake coughs per hour at baseline and week 24. The GMR (Week 24 GM awake coughs per hour divided by Baseline GM awake coughs per hour) is reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline in the Leicester Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The 19-item LCQ assessed the impact of chronic cough in three health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains (physical, social and psychological). The LCQ is calculated as a mean score for each domain ranging from 1 to 7, with a total score ranging from 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL. A clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in HRQoL was defined as ≥1.3-point increase in the LCQ total score at Week 24. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≥1.3-point increase in the LCQ total score at Week 24 is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
24-hour coughs per hour was defined as the average hourly cough frequency based on 24-hour sound recordings using a digital recording device (cough monitor). A clinically meaningful improvement from baseline is defined as a ≥30% reduction in 24-hour coughs per hour at week 24. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≥30% reduction from baseline in 24-hour coughs per hour at Week 24 (≥30% reduction from baseline) is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥1.3-point Reduction From Baseline of Mean Weekly Cough Severity Diary (CSD) Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The 7-item CSD was used to record participants' daily cough frequency, cough intensity, and disruption due to cough. Each item was rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); the total daily CSD score was the sum of these seven item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean weekly CSD total score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores collected during the week prior to each visit. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≥1.3 point reduction from baseline in CSD at Week 24 is reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥2.7-point Reduction From Baseline of Mean Weekly CSD Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The 7-item CSD was used to record participants' daily cough frequency, cough intensity, and disruption due to cough. Each item was rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); the total daily CSD score was the sum of these seven item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean weekly CSD total score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores collected during the week prior to each visit. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≥2.7 point reduction from baseline in CSD at Week 24 is reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥30 mm Reduction From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
The VAS is a single-item questionnaire with the response on a 100- point scale ranging from 0 ("No Cough") to 100 ("Extremely Severe Cough"). Mean weekly VAS score was defined as the average of the VAS scores collected during the week prior to each visit. The percentage of participants (logistic regression model-based) with a ≥30mm reduction from baseline in cough severity VAS score at Week 24 is reported.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYModel-Based Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 24-Hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants needed to have baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
RatioGEOMETRIC_MEAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) During Treatment and Follow-upUp to 54 weeksAll randomized China participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed in the group as treated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AEUp 52 weeksAll randomized China participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed in the group as treated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYModel-Based GMR of Awake Coughs Per Hour at Week 24/BaselineBaseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants needed to have awake 24-hour cough data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
RatioGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline in the Leicester Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants needed to have LCQ data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants needed to have 24-hour cough data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With ≥1.3-point Reduction From Baseline of Mean Weekly Cough Severity Diary (CSD) Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants needed to have CSD data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With ≥2.7-point Reduction From Baseline of Mean Weekly CSD Total Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants needed to have CSD data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥30 mm Reduction From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
All China participants randomized to the gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Efficacy evaluation of the gefapixant 15 mg BID group was removed from the study objectives of the China cohort per protocol amendment 5. Participants needed to have CSD data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement. Participants were analyzed in the group as randomized.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Model-Based Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 24-Hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24Placebo0.4795% Confidence Interval 0.35 to 0.64Ratio
Model-Based Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of 24-Hour Coughs Per Hour at Week 24Gefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)0.5195% Confidence Interval 0.37 to 0.71Ratio
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) During Treatment and Follow-upPlacebo54Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) During Treatment and Follow-upGefapixant 15 mg BID20Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE) During Treatment and Follow-upGefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)58Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AEGefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)0Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AEGefapixant 15 mg BID1Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to an AEPlacebo5Participants
Model-Based GMR of Awake Coughs Per Hour at Week 24/BaselinePlacebo0.4695% Confidence Interval 0.33 to 0.62Ratio
Model-Based GMR of Awake Coughs Per Hour at Week 24/BaselineGefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)0.5195% Confidence Interval 0.37 to 0.70Ratio

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo68
Overall StudySTARTEDGefapixant 15 mg BID27
Overall StudySTARTEDGefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)66
Overall StudyNumber TreatedPlacebo67
Overall StudyNumber TreatedGefapixant 15 mg BID27
Overall StudyNumber TreatedGefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)66
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo52
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGefapixant 15 mg BID21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGefapixant 45 mg Twice Daily (BID)45
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo16

Adverse events96

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherChronic gastritisGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1671
otherChronic gastritisGastrointestinal disordersMK-7264 15 mg BID0270
otherChronic gastritisGastrointestinal disordersMK-7264 45 mg BID4665
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3673
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersMK-7264 15 mg BID0270
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersMK-7264 45 mg BID4664
otherGastritisGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0670
otherGastritisGastrointestinal disordersMK-7264 15 mg BID3273
otherGastritisGastrointestinal disordersMK-7264 45 mg BID2662
otherHypoaesthesia oralGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1671

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo068
Total, all-cause mortalityMK-7264 15 mg BID027
Total, all-cause mortalityMK-7264 45 mg BID066
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo4267
Total, other adverse eventsMK-7264 15 mg BID1727
Total, other adverse eventsMK-7264 45 mg BID5366
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo467
Total, serious adverse eventsMK-7264 15 mg BID427
Total, serious adverse eventsMK-7264 45 mg BID266

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04525885

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04525885/events?page=2