ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04534465

Study to Gather Information on the Acceptability of a New Flavor System With Increasing Levels of 2, 4, 6 g or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 in Subjects Having Infrequent Bowel Movements.

NCT04534465, Phase 4, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2020-11-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Gather Information on the Acceptability of a New Flavor System With Increasing Levels of 2, 4, 6 g or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 in Subjects Having Infrequent Bowel Movements. Trials, record NCT04534465. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04534465

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Gather Information on the Acceptability of a New Flavor System With Increasing Levels of 2, 4, 6 g or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 in Subjects Having Infrequent Bowel Movements.
NCT number
NCT04534465
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
50 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Constipation
Interventions
Polyethylene glycol (MiraLAX, BAY81-8430), Mannitol
First posted
2020-09-01
Last updated
2020-11-12
Results first posted
2020-11-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Flavor1 dayEvaluated by 7-point scales: 1-extremely dislike, 2-moderately dislike, 3-dislike somewhat, 4-neither like nor dislike, 5-like somewhat, 6-moderately like, 7-extremely like
PrimaryNumber of Participants With the Opinion of the Amount of Flavor in the Products1 dayEvaluated by 7-point scales: -3 -extremely weak, -2 -somewhat weak, -1 -slightly weak, 0 -just the right level of flavor, 1 -slightly intense, 2 -moderately intense, 3 -much too intense
PrimaryNumber of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Sweetness1 day
Evaluated by 7-point scales: -3 -no sweetness needed, -2 -needs to be moderately sweeter, -1 -needs to be a little sweeter, 0 -just the right level of sweetness, 1 -slightly too sweet, 2 -moderately sweet, 3 -much too sweet
PrimaryNumber of Participants With/Without Cooling Sensation in the Products.1 dayWhether or not subjects felt a cooling sensation (yes/no).
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Different Levels of Cooling Sensation of the Products1 dayEvaluated by 4-point scales: 1 -barely perceptible, 2 -slightly noticeable, 3 -moderately noticeable, 4 -extremely noticeable
PrimaryNumber of Participants With the Opinion of Aftertaste in the Products.1 dayWhether or not subjects experienced aftertaste (yes/no).
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Different Levels of Aftertaste of the Products1 dayEvaluated by 3-point scales: 1 -slightly noticeable, 2 -moderately noticeable, 3 -extremely noticeable
SecondaryNumber of Participants With no Bowel Movement1 dayThe number of subjects who did not report any bowel movement was evaluated.
SecondaryTime to First Bowel Movement (In Hours)1 dayThe mean and standard deviation of the time to first bowel movement in hours were evaluated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants for Gas Rating1 dayA gas rating score of 0 means that there was no gas experienced, while a score of 1 represents slight gas experienced, 2 represents moderate gas experienced and 3 represents severe gas experienced.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Flavor1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With the Opinion of the Amount of Flavor in the Products1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Sweetness1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With/Without Cooling Sensation in the Products.1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With no Bowel Movement1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTime to First Bowel Movement (In Hours)1 dayHoursMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants for Gas Rating1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants for Bloating Rating1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants for Abdominal Discomfort Rating1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With no Successful Bowel Movement1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group250

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 11- Extremely Dislike1Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 21- Extremely Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosiing Arm 31- Extremely Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 41- Extremely Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 51- Extremely Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 12- Moderately Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 22- Moderately Dislike3Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosiing Arm 32- Moderately Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 42- Moderately Dislike0Participants
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' FlavorDosing Arm 52- Moderately Dislike0Participants

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDosing Arm 110
Overall StudySTARTEDDosing Arm 210
Overall StudySTARTEDDosing Arm 310
Overall StudySTARTEDDosing Arm 410
Overall StudySTARTEDDosing Arm 510
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDosing Arm 110
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDosing Arm 210
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDosing Arm 310
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDosing Arm 410
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDosing Arm 510

Adverse events25

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIncreased GasGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 1310
otherIncreased GasGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 2210
otherIncreased GasGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 3210
otherIncreased GasGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 4610
otherIncreased GasGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 5510
otherIncreased BloatingGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 1110
otherIncreased BloatingGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 2010
otherIncreased BloatingGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 3410
otherIncreased BloatingGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 4010
otherIncreased BloatingGastrointestinal disordersDosing Arm 5110

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDosing Arm 1010
Total, all-cause mortalityDosing Arm 2010
Total, all-cause mortalityDosing Arm 3010
Total, all-cause mortalityDosing Arm 4010
Total, all-cause mortalityDosing Arm 5010
Total, other adverse eventsDosing Arm 1610
Total, other adverse eventsDosing Arm 2310
Total, other adverse eventsDosing Arm 3410
Total, other adverse eventsDosing Arm 4710
Total, other adverse eventsDosing Arm 5610

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04534465

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04534465/results?page=2