ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04550936

A Study to Understand How the Use of Paxlovid Affected the Healthcare Use in People With Pre-existing Conditions.

NCT04550936, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2025-12-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Understand How the Use of Paxlovid Affected the Healthcare Use in People With Pre-existing Conditions. Trials, record NCT04550936. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04550936

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Understand How the Use of Paxlovid Affected the Healthcare Use in People With Pre-existing Conditions.
NCT number
NCT04550936
Status
Completed
Enrollment
307 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Invasive Aspergillosis, Mucormycosis
Interventions
Isavuconazole
First posted
2020-09-16
Last updated
2025-12-09
Results first posted
2025-12-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes40

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Clinical response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Clinical success, clinical failure and unknown. Clinical success: resolution or partial resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. Clinical failure: no resolution of any attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and/or worsening. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any clinical response at Week 6 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12Week 12 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Clinical response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Clinical success, clinical failure and unknown. Clinical success: resolution or partial resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. Clinical failure: no resolution of any attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and/or worsening. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any clinical response at Week 12 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 24Week 24 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Clinical response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Clinical success, clinical failure and unknown. Clinical success: resolution or partial resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. Clinical failure: no resolution of any attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and/or worsening. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any clinical response at Week 24 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Radiological Response at Week 6Week 6 post index date or end of treatment, which ever occurred earlier (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Radiological response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Radiological success, radiological failure and unknown. Radiological success: greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from initial assessment, or improvement of at least 25% from the initial assessment for the follow-up at 6 weeks or if end of treatment occurred before this time. Radiological failure: Failure to meet success criteria. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any radiological response at Week 6 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Radiological Response at Week 12Week 12 post index date or end of treatment, which ever occurred earlier (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Radiological response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Radiological success, radiological failure and unknown. Radiological success: \>= 50% improvement from initial assessment, or improvement of at least 25% from the initial assessment for the follow-up at 12 weeks or if end of treatment occurred before this time. Radiological failure: Failure to meet success criteria. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any radiological response at Week 12 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Radiological Response at Week 24Week 24 post index date or end of treatment, which ever occurred earlier (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Radiological response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Radiological success, radiological failure and unknown. Radiological success: \>= 50% improvement from initial assessment, or improvement of at least 25% from the initial assessment for the follow-up at 24 weeks or if end of treatment occurred before this time. Radiological failure: Failure to meet success criteria. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any radiological response at Week 24 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Mycological Response at Week 6Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Mycological response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Mycological success, mycological failure and unknown. Mycological success: eradication or presumed eradication of the original causative organism cultured. Mycological failure: persistence or presumed persistence. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any mycological response at Week 6 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Mycological Response at Week 12Week 12 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Mycological response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Mycological success, mycological failure and unknown. Mycological success: eradication or presumed eradication of the original causative organism cultured. Mycological failure: persistence or presumed persistence. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any mycological response at Week 12 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Mycological Response at Week 24Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Mycological response was evaluated according to the following mutually exclusive modalities: Mycological success, mycological failure and unknown. Mycological success: eradication or presumed eradication of the original causative organism cultured. Mycological failure: persistence or presumed persistence. Unknown: if there was not enough documentation to make the classification success or failure. Number of participants with any mycological response at Week 24 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.
PrimaryAll-Cause Mortality at Week 6Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)
Number of participants who died due to any cause at Week 6 post index date were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as date of Isavuconazole treatment initiation anytime in between 15 October 2015 until 30 June 2019.

Outcomes40

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12Week 12 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 24Week 24 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Radiological Response at Week 6Week 6 post index date or end of treatment, which ever occurred earlier (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Radiological Response at Week 12Week 12 post index date or end of treatment, which ever occurred earlier (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Radiological Response at Week 24Week 24 post index date or end of treatment, which ever occurred earlier (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Mycological Response at Week 6Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Mycological Response at Week 12Week 12 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Mycological Response at Week 24Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYAll-Cause Mortality at Week 6Week 6 post index date (retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion, approximately 34 months)Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data was retrieved and analyzed in this study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group206

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6Invasive AspergillosisUnknown173Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6MucormycosisUnknown14Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6Invasive AspergillosisClinical success27Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6MucormycosisClinical success3Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6Invasive AspergillosisClinical failure1Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6MucormycosisClinical failure0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12Invasive AspergillosisUnknown185Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12MucormycosisUnknown15Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12Invasive AspergillosisClinical success16Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12MucormycosisClinical success2Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDInvasive Aspergillosis201
Overall StudySTARTEDMucormycosis17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInvasive Aspergillosis201
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMucormycosis17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInvasive Aspergillosis0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMucormycosis0

Adverse events140

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersInvasive Aspergillosis2201
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersMucormycosis017
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersInvasive Aspergillosis2201
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersMucormycosis017
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersInvasive Aspergillosis1201
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersMucormycosis017
otherPhlebitisGeneral disordersInvasive Aspergillosis0201
otherPhlebitisGeneral disordersMucormycosis117
otherPeripheral oedemaGeneral disordersInvasive Aspergillosis0201
otherPeripheral oedemaGeneral disordersMucormycosis117

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInvasive Aspergillosis127201
Total, all-cause mortalityMucormycosis1017
Total, other adverse eventsInvasive Aspergillosis17201
Total, other adverse eventsMucormycosis217
Total, serious adverse eventsInvasive Aspergillosis34201
Total, serious adverse eventsMucormycosis317

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39443403DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons17

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Adverse Event at Week 24Trial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Inpatient HospitalizationTrial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Adverse Event at Week 12Trial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Isavuconazole Administered as Part of Combination TherapyTrial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: All-Cause Mortality at Week 6Trial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Event at Week 12Trial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants Who Switched to New AntifungalTrial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Adverse Event at Week 6Trial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Any Outpatient VisitsTrial comparisons
Invasive Aspergillosis vs Mucormycosis: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Event at Week 6Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04550936

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04550936/registered?page=2