ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04552899

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Pentraxin-2 (rhPTX-2; PRM-151) in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

NCT04552899, Phase 3, Terminated, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2024-04-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Pentraxin-2 (rhPTX-2; PRM-151) in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Trials, record NCT04552899. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04552899

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Pentraxin-2 (rhPTX-2; PRM-151) in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
NCT number
NCT04552899
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
665 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Interventions
PRM-151 (Zinpentraxin Alfa), Placebo
First posted
2020-09-17
Last updated
2024-04-18
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-000791-38
Results first posted
2024-04-18
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated early based on the futility analysis which concluded that zinpentraxin alfa was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAbsolute Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC [mL])From Baseline up to Week 52
SecondaryAbsolute Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)From Baseline up to Week 52
SecondaryAbsolute Change in FVC% PredictedFrom Baseline up to Week 52
SecondaryTime to Disease ProgressionFrom Baseline up to 1 year
SecondaryTime to First Respiratory-related HospitalizationsFrom Baseline up to 1 year
SecondaryChange in University of California, San Diego-Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ)At Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52
The UCSD-SOBQ is a 24-item questionnaire used to assess dyspnea severity during specific activities (21 items) and limitations caused by dyspnea in daily life (4 items). Items are assessed using a 6-point scale. Total scores, once summed, can range from 0-120 with a higher score reflecting greater dyspnea severity.
SecondaryChange in St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreAt Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52
The SGRQ is a 50-item respiratory-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. The questions assess the impact of disease on activity, functionality and symptoms. Each scale is scored from 0-100. A total score represents the weighted average of these three subscores. A lower score indicates best health while a higher score indicates worst health.
SecondaryTime to First Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)From Baseline up to 1 year
SecondaryChange in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)At Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52
SecondarySurvivalFrom Baseline up to 1 yearSurvival is measured by all-cause mortality

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAbsolute Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC [mL])From Baseline up to Week 52
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
Milliliters (mL)MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)From Baseline up to Week 52
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
Meters (m)MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in FVC% PredictedFrom Baseline up to Week 52
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
Percent predictedMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Disease ProgressionFrom Baseline up to 1 year
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to First Respiratory-related HospitalizationsFrom Baseline up to 1 year
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange in University of California, San Diego-Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ)At Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreAt Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTime to First Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)From Baseline up to 1 year
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)At Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
DLCO% PredictedMEAN
SECONDARYSurvivalFrom Baseline up to 1 year
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one administration (full or partial dose) of study drug and used the grouping according to the treatment assignment at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group67

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Absolute Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC [mL])Zinpentraxin Alfa-235.7295% Confidence Interval -283.07 to -188.4Milliliters (mL)
Absolute Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC [mL])Placebo-214.8995% Confidence Interval -262.44 to -167.3Milliliters (mL)
Absolute Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Zinpentraxin Alfa-33.6495% Confidence Interval -48.71 to -18.57Meters (m)
Absolute Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Placebo-24.1995% Confidence Interval -39.29 to -9.10Meters (m)
Absolute Change in FVC% PredictedZinpentraxin Alfa-6.2295% Confidence Interval -7.46 to -4.98Percent predicted
Absolute Change in FVC% PredictedPlacebo-5.7295% Confidence Interval -6.96 to -4.47Percent predicted
Time to Disease ProgressionZinpentraxin Alfa6.695% Confidence Interval 5.6 to 9.1Months
Time to Disease ProgressionPlacebo8.295% Confidence Interval 6.5 to 10.9Months
Time to First Respiratory-related HospitalizationsZinpentraxin AlfaNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMonths
Time to First Respiratory-related HospitalizationsPlaceboNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMonths

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDZinpentraxin Alfa331
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo333
Overall StudyNo TreatmentZinpentraxin Alfa1
Overall StudyNo TreatmentPlacebo3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDZinpentraxin Alfa56
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo49
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDZinpentraxin Alfa275
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo284

Adverse events138

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersZinpentraxin Alfa3533148
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3432939
otherFatigueGeneral disordersZinpentraxin Alfa1733122
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo1432914
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsZinpentraxin Alfa5733159
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo5732960
otherInfusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsZinpentraxin Alfa3133142
otherInfusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPlacebo2932955
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersZinpentraxin Alfa4233146
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo3832942

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityZinpentraxin Alfa4331
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo4333
Total, other adverse eventsZinpentraxin Alfa140331
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo128329
Total, serious adverse eventsZinpentraxin Alfa46331
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo40329

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
36724330DERIVEDPubMed
38354066DERIVEDPubMed
39761005DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Zinpentraxin Alfa vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Trial comparisons
Zinpentraxin Alfa vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants With Infusion-related Reactions (IRRs) and Other Adverse Events of Special InterestTrial comparisons
Zinpentraxin Alfa vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Zinpentraxin Alfa vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants Permanently Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to AEsTrial comparisons
Zinpentraxin Alfa vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04552899

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04552899/results?page=2