ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04572854

Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan in Post-Transplant Recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN

NCT04572854, Phase 2, Completed, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2025-02-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan in Post-Transplant Recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN. Trials, record NCT04572854. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04572854

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan in Post-Transplant Recurrence of C3G or IC-MPGN
NCT number
NCT04572854
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
13 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
C3G, IC-MPGN, Renal Transplant, Complement 3 Glomerulopathy, Complement 3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), Dense Deposit Disease (DDD), Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (MPGN), Immune Complex Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN), C3 Glomerulopathy, C3 Glomerulonephritis, Complement 3 Glomerulonephritis
Interventions
Pegcetacoplan
First posted
2020-10-01
Last updated
2026-04-21
Results first posted
2025-02-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 12Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
C3c staining intensity is semi quantitatively graded on a scale of 0 to 3, in which negative, 1+, 2+ and 3+ staining corresponds to scores of 0 to 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the highest intensity seen on immunofluorescence. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Reduction in C3c staining was defined as decrease of at least 2 orders of magnitude of intensity from baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
C3c staining intensity is semi quantitatively graded on a scale of 0 to 3, in which negative, 1+, 2+ and 3+ staining corresponds to scores of 0 to 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the highest intensity seen on immunofluorescence. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Reduction in C3c staining was defined as decrease of at least 2 orders of magnitude of intensity from baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 and Week 52
C3c staining intensity is semi quantitatively graded on a scale of 0 to 3, in which negative, 1+, 2+ and 3+ staining corresponds to scores of 0 to 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the highest intensity seen on immunofluorescence. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects. Number of subjects who demonstrated a shift of C3c staining from baseline to Week 12 and baseline to Week 52 are presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Stabilization or Improvement in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
eGFR was calculated by using Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation. Stabilization or improvement in eGFR was defined as no more than a 25% decrease relative to baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Stabilization or Improvement of Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine was defined as no increase or an increase of no more than 25% from baseline. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of eGFR which was calculated by using CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of eGFR which was calculated by using CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of serum creatinine concentration. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for analysis of serum creatinine concentration. Baseline was defined as the most recent non-missing measurement prior to first administration of study drug for Group 1 subjects or randomization for Group 2 subjects.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 12Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Stabilization or Improvement in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Stabilization or Improvement of Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized. Only subjects with data collected at baseline and Week 52 are reported.milliliter/minute/1.73 square meterMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized. Only subjects with data collected at baseline and Week 52 are reported.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized. Only subjects with data collected at baseline and Week 52 are reported.milligram per deciliterMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Concentration at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all subjects who were randomized. Only subjects with data collected at baseline and Week 52 are reported.percentage changeMEAN

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 12Part A: Controlled Portion: Group 150.095% Confidence Interval 18.7 to 81.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 12Part A: Controlled Portion: Group 233.395% Confidence Interval 0.8 to 90.6Percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 150.095% Confidence Interval 18.7 to 81.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With Reduction in C3c Staining on Renal Biopsy at Week 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 266.795% Confidence Interval 9.4 to 99.2Percentage of participants
Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 1Shift from 3 at baseline to 0 at Week 123Participants
Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 2Shift from 3 at baseline to 0 at Week 120Participants
Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 1Shift from 2 at baseline to 0 at Week 121Participants
Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 2Shift from 2 at baseline to 0 at Week 120Participants
Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 1Shift from 3 at baseline to 1 at Week 121Participants
Number of Subjects With Shift of C3c Staining From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 52Part A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 2Shift from 3 at baseline to 1 at Week 121Participants

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12STARTEDPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 110
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12STARTEDPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 23
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12STARTEDPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 10
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12STARTEDPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 20
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12COMPLETEDPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 110
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12COMPLETEDPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 23
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12COMPLETEDPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 10
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12COMPLETEDPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 20
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12NOT COMPLETEDPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 10
Part A: Controlled: Weeks 1 to 12NOT COMPLETEDPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 20

Adverse events300

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 12102
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 2131
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 11101
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 2030
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 11101
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 2131
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 10100
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 2030
otherCytomegalovirus infection reactivationInfections and infestationsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 11101
otherCytomegalovirus infection reactivationInfections and infestationsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 2030

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 1010
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 203
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 1010
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 203
Total, other adverse eventsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 1710
Total, other adverse eventsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 233
Total, other adverse eventsPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 1810
Total, other adverse eventsPart A: Non-controlled Portion: Group 233
Total, serious adverse eventsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 1510
Total, serious adverse eventsPart A: Controlled Portion: Group 203

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04572854

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04572854/results?page=2