ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04585789

Outcomes41

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPanel 1 and 2: Absolute Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Hepatocytes at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panels 1 and 2 alone.
percentage of HBsAg hepatocytesMEAN
PRIMARYPanel 3: Liver Concentrations of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976, JNJ-73763924 and JNJ-87719164 [M65; Deaminated Metabolite of JNJ-73763976]) at Week 12At Week 12 (at the time of liver biopsy: 24 hours post dose of JNJ-73763989)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3 alone.
nanograms per gram (ng/g)MEAN
PRIMARYPanel 3: Liver Concentrations of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976, and JNJ-73763924 and JNJ-87719164 [M65; Deaminated Metabolite of JNJ-73763976]) at Week 40At Week 40 (at the time of liver biopsy: 24 hours post dose of JNJ-73763989)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3 alone.
ng/gMEAN
PRIMARYPanel 3: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976, and JNJ-73763924) at Week 12At Week 12 (at the time of liver biopsy: 24 hours post dose of JNJ-73763989)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3 alone.
nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL)MEAN
PRIMARYPanel 3: Plasma Concentrations of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) at Week 40At Week 40 (at the time of liver biopsy: 24 hours post dose of JNJ-73763989)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure (OM) was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3 alone.
ng/mLMEAN
PRIMARY
Panel 3: Correlation of Liver Concentration to Plasma Concentration of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) and Liver Concentration of JNJ-87719164 (M65: Deaminated Metabolite of JNJ-73763976) to Liver Concentration JNJ-73763976 at Week 12
Week 12 (at the time of liver biopsy: 24 hours post dose of JNJ-73763989)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3 alone.
ratioMEAN
PRIMARY
Panel 3: Correlation of Liver to Plasma Concentration of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) and Liver Concentration of JNJ-87719164 (M65: Deaminated Metabolite of JNJ-73763976) to Liver Concentration JNJ-73763976 at Week 40
Week 40 (at the time of liver biopsy: 24 hours post dose of JNJ-73763989)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3 alone.
ratioMEAN
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Sustained (Reduction) Serum HBsAg Response Per Definition 2 at Follow-up Week 48Follow-up Week 48
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this OM.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBsAg SeroclearanceFollow-up Week 48
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBeAg SeroclearanceFollow-up Week 48
ITT population: participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. N(Number of participants analyzed) = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data was not collected for Panel 2 participants as they were HBeAg negative at enrollment and thus did not fulfill planned analysis criteria (HBeAg positive status).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPanel 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Percentage of Intrahepatic Viral Parameter: Hepatitis B Core Antigen Positive (HBcAg+) Hepatocytes at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3.
percent change in HBcAg+ HepatocytesMEDIAN
SECONDARYPanel 1,and 2: Change From Baseline in Percentage of Intrahepatic Viral Parameter: Covalently Closed Circular Deoxyribonucleic Acid Positive (cccDNA+) Hepatocytes at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3.
percent change in cccDNA+ hepatocytesMEDIAN
SECONDARYPanel 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Percentage of Intrahepatic Viral Parameter: HBsAg Positive (HBsAg+) Hepatocytes at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm andreceived at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3.
percent change in HBsAg+ hepatocytesMEDIAN
SECONDARYPanel 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Percentage of Intrahepatic Viral Parameter: Pre-genomic Ribonucleic Acid Positive (pgRNA+) Hepatocytes at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3.
percent change in pgRNA+ hepatocytesMEDIAN
SECONDARYPanel 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Transcriptional Activity (Ratio of pg RNA/cccDNA) at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3.
ratioMEDIAN
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2: Change From Baseline in Percentage of Intrahepatic Viral Parameter: Silent Infected Hepatocytes at Week 40Baseline, Week 40
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Panel 3.
percent change in SIHMEDIAN
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance at Week 72 Without Restarting Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) TreatmentAt Week 72 (24 weeks after completion of all study drugs at Week 48)
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Sustained (Reduction) Serum HBsAg Response Per Definition 1 at Follow-up Week 48Follow-up Week 48
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Sustained (Reduction) Serum HBsAg Response Per Definition 3 at Follow-up Week 48From follow-up Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPanel 1, 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With Sustained (Reduction) Serum HBsAg Response Per Definition 4 at Follow-up Week 48Follow-up Week 48
ITT population included participants who were randomly assigned or enrolled to an intervention arm and received at least 1 dose of intervention. Participants were analyzed according to study intervention they were randomly assigned or enrolled. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04585789/outcomes