ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04599972

An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of CSF-1 in the Temporary Correction of Presbyopia (NEAR-2)

NCT04599972, Phase 3, Completed, Orasis Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; results first posted 2023-11-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of CSF-1 in the Temporary Correction of Presbyopia (NEAR-2). Trials, record NCT04599972. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04599972

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of CSF-1 in the Temporary Correction of Presbyopia (NEAR-2)
NCT number
NCT04599972
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
304 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Orasis Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Conditions
Presbyopia
Interventions
CSF-1, Vehicle
First posted
2020-10-23
Last updated
2024-04-04
Results first posted
2023-11-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA (Best Distance-Corrected Visual Acuity) at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8, 1 Hour Post-Dose 1.Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (1 hour post-Dose 1)
The primary end-point was measured on Day 8, 1 hour post first CSF-1 dose, as the number of participants who are responders to the treatment. A responder was defined as as subject with a ≥ 3-line gain in BDCVA (Best Distance-Corrected Visual Acuity) at 40cm and no loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 letters at 4m.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m.Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (2 hours post-Dose 1)
The key secondary endpoints were measured on Day 8 at different time points and were the percentage of subjects with a ≥ 3-line (15-letter) gain, from baseline, in BDCVA at 40 cm (Precision Vision Chart) and no loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 letters (ETDRS chart at 4 m) in the study eye.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 1 Hour Post-Dose 2Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (1 hour post Dose 2; Dose 2 occurred 2 hours following Dose 1)
The key secondary endpoints were measured on Day 8 at different time points and were the percentage of subjects with a ≥ 3-line (15-letter) gain, from baseline, in BDCVA at 40 cm (Precision Vision Chart) and no loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 letters (ETDRS chart at 4 m) in the study eye.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 2 Hours Post-dose 2Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (2 hours post Dose 2; Dose 2 occurred 2 hours following Dose 1)
The key secondary endpoints were measured on Day 8 at different time points and were the percentage of subjects with a ≥ 3-line (15-letter) gain, from baseline, in BDCVA at 40 cm (Precision Vision Chart) and no loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 letters (ETDRS chart at 4 m) in the study eye.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA (Best Distance-Corrected Visual Acuity) at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8, 1 Hour Post-Dose 1.Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (1 hour post-Dose 1)Full analysis set (FAS): included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Subjects in the FAS were analyzed as randomized.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m.Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (2 hours post-Dose 1)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 1 Hour Post-Dose 2Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (1 hour post Dose 2; Dose 2 occurred 2 hours following Dose 1)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 2 Hours Post-dose 2Baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 (2 hours post Dose 2; Dose 2 occurred 2 hours following Dose 1)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA (Best Distance-Corrected Visual Acuity) at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8, 1 Hour Post-Dose 1.CSF-164Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA (Best Distance-Corrected Visual Acuity) at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8, 1 Hour Post-Dose 1.Vehicle32Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m.CSF-162Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m.Vehicle31Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 1 Hour Post-Dose 2CSF-180Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 1 Hour Post-Dose 2Vehicle25Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 2 Hours Post-dose 2CSF-171Participants
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 2 Hours Post-dose 2Vehicle29Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCSF-1154
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle150
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCSF-1144
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle142
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCSF-110
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle8

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
othervision blurredEye disordersCSF-111153
othervision blurredEye disordersVehicle2151
otherinstillation site painGeneral disordersCSF-19153
otherinstillation site painGeneral disordersVehicle0151
otherheadacheNervous system disordersCSF-115153
otherheadacheNervous system disordersVehicle2151
seriousinfective arthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersCSF-10153
seriousinfective arthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle1151

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCSF-10153
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle0151
Total, other adverse eventsCSF-135153
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle2151
Total, serious adverse eventsCSF-10153
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle1151

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38216351DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
CSF-1 vs Vehicle: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 2 Hours Post-dose 2Trial comparisons
CSF-1 vs Vehicle: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8 at 1 Hour Post-Dose 2Trial comparisons
CSF-1 vs Vehicle: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA (Best Distance-Corrected Visual Acuity) at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m on Day 8, 1 Hour Post-Dose 1.Trial comparisons
CSF-1 vs Vehicle: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
CSF-1 vs Vehicle: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 3-line Gain in BDCVA at 40cm and no Loss in BDCVA ≥ 5 Letters at 4m.Trial comparisons
CSF-1 vs Vehicle: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04599972

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04599972/registered