ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04605094

Efficacy and Safety Study of the Use of Benralizumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

NCT04605094, Phase 2, Terminated, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2023-06-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of the Use of Benralizumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Trials, record NCT04605094. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04605094

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of the Use of Benralizumab for Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
NCT number
NCT04605094
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
194 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Atopic Dermatitis
Interventions
Benralizumab, Placebo / Benralizumab
First posted
2020-10-27
Last updated
2023-08-31
Results first posted
2023-06-27
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated as the study did not support the continued development of benralizumab for the indication of AD.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and a Decrease in IGA of ≥2 Points at Week 16 Relative to BaselineBaseline (Week 0) and at Week 16
The IGA is an instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD globally, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild disease; 3 = moderate disease; 4 = severe disease. The IGA used clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A higher score indicated greater severity. A responder at Week 16 was defined as having IGA 0/1 and a decrease in IGA of ≥2 points at Week 16 relative to baseline. Participants who withdrew from the study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were considered as non-responders from the time these events occurred. Baseline was defined as the last recorded value on or prior to the date of randomization.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 16
The EASI assessed the severity and extent of AD. Severity of 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation \[scratching\], lichenification) each were assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) in each of 4 body regions (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Total body total score=sum of the region total scores; ranged from 0 to 72. Participants were classified as responders if they achieved at least 75% reduction from baseline in their EASI total score at Week 16. Participants who withdrew from study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were non-responders from the time these events occurred. Higher scores indicated a more severe or more extensive condition. Baseline was defined as the last recorded value on or prior to the date of randomization.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced 90% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 16
The EASI assessed the severity and extent of AD. Severity of 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation \[scratching\], lichenification) each were assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) in each of 4 body regions (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Total body total score=sum of the region total scores; ranged from 0 to 72. Participants were classified as responders if they achieved at least 90% reduction from baseline in their EASI total score at Week 16. Participants who withdrew from study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were non-responders from the time these events occurred. Higher scores indicated a more severe or more extensive condition. Baseline was defined as the last recorded value on or prior to the date of randomization.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of ≥4 or More Points in Peak Pruritus Weekly ScoreAt Week 16
The peak pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) was a 1-item daily assessment of the worst itch the participant experienced over the past 24 hours. The score ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable" and so a reduction in score was considered an improvement. A responder was defined as having an improvement of 4 or more points relative to baseline. Participants who withdrew from the study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were considered as non-responders from the time these events occurred. The Week 16 weekly scores were defined as the average of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the weekly score.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and a Decrease in IGA of ≥2 Points at Week 16 Relative to BaselineBaseline (Week 0) and at Week 16The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 16The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced 90% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 16The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of ≥4 or More Points in Peak Pruritus Weekly ScoreAt Week 16The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and a Decrease in IGA of ≥2 Points at Week 16 Relative to BaselineBenralizumab9.495% Confidence Interval 3.36 to 14.93percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and a Decrease in IGA of ≥2 Points at Week 16 Relative to BaselinePlacebo17.395% Confidence Interval 10.40 to 25.12percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 16Benralizumab19.895% Confidence Interval 11.71 to 27.45percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 16Placebo24.595% Confidence Interval 16.27 to 33.19percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 90% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at Week 16Benralizumab7.395% Confidence Interval 2.05 to 12.42percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 90% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at Week 16Placebo15.395% Confidence Interval 8.33 to 22.50percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of ≥4 or More Points in Peak Pruritus Weekly ScoreBenralizumab14.695% Confidence Interval 7.87 to 21.70percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of ≥4 or More Points in Peak Pruritus Weekly ScorePlacebo14.395% Confidence Interval 7.28 to 20.90percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBenralizumab96
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo98
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBenralizumab37
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo37
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBenralizumab59
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo61

Adverse events33

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsBenralizumab5965
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo0980
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo to Benralizumab4874
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsBenralizumab3964
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo0980
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo to Benralizumab6876
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsBenralizumab219623
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo4984
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo to Benralizumab148714
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsBenralizumab99610

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBenralizumab096
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo098
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo to Benralizumab087
Total, other adverse eventsBenralizumab3896
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1098
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo to Benralizumab2987
Total, serious adverse eventsBenralizumab396
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo098
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo to Benralizumab287

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04605094

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04605094/events?page=2