ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04611347

Is Topical CBD Effective in Treating Thumb Joint Arthritis

NCT04611347, Phase 2, Completed, University of Virginia; results first posted 2025-07-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Is Topical CBD Effective in Treating Thumb Joint Arthritis. Trials, record NCT04611347. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04611347

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Is Topical CBD Effective in Treating Thumb Joint Arthritis
NCT number
NCT04611347
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
18 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Conditions
CBD, Hand Osteoarthritis
Interventions
CBD, Shea Butter
First posted
2020-11-02
Last updated
2025-07-03
Results first posted
2025-07-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Hand Strength During Intervention and at Follow-up.Change from baseline to 2 weeksGrip strength, kg.
PrimaryChange in the PROMIS Upper Extremity Tests During Intervention and at Follow-up.Change from baseline to 2 weeks
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring the physical function of the upper extremity. It is scored using a T-score, and the average is 50 for the U.S. population. In a given PROMIS, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the average. For this variable, a T-score above 50 indicates greater physical function than the average population.
PrimaryChange in Kapandji ScoreChange from baseline to 2 weeks
Kapandji score (ranging 0 to 10) is validated measures in past studies as outcomes for hand disability. The Kapandji score is a tool useful for assessing the opposition of the thumb, based on where on their hand the patient is able to touch with the tip of their thumb. A score of 0 indicates no opposition, a score of 10 indicates maximal opposition.
PrimaryChange in Hand Range of MotionChange from baseline to 2 weeksMetacarpal phalangeal (MP) range of motion, passive extension.
SecondaryRate of Side Effects Using Novel CBD Cream.Change from baseline to 2 weeksSide effects will be assessed at each encounter clinical evaluation by patient report in a Symptom Diary. All side effects thought to be secondary to CBD will be documented.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Hand Strength During Intervention and at Follow-up.Change from baseline to 2 weeksSubjects served as their own control so 18 people completed each intervention.KGMEAN
PRIMARYChange in the PROMIS Upper Extremity Tests During Intervention and at Follow-up.Change from baseline to 2 weeksSubjects served as their own control so 18 people completed each intervention.score on a surveyMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Kapandji ScoreChange from baseline to 2 weeksSubjects served as their own control so 18 people completed each intervention.score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Hand Range of MotionChange from baseline to 2 weeksSubjects served as their own control so 18 people completed each intervention.degreesMEAN
SECONDARYRate of Side Effects Using Novel CBD Cream.Change from baseline to 2 weeksSubjects served as their own control so 18 people completed each intervention.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Hand Strength During Intervention and at Follow-up.CBD Group24Standard Deviation 2.3KG
Change in Hand Strength During Intervention and at Follow-up.Shea Butter Group23Standard Deviation 2.8KG
Change in the PROMIS Upper Extremity Tests During Intervention and at Follow-up.CBD Group4.2Standard Deviation 1.8score on a survey
Change in the PROMIS Upper Extremity Tests During Intervention and at Follow-up.Shea Butter Group38Standard Deviation 1.5score on a survey
Change in Kapandji ScoreCBD Group9Standard Deviation 0.2score on a scale
Change in Kapandji ScoreShea Butter Group9Standard Deviation 0.4score on a scale
Change in Hand Range of MotionCBD Group-7.5Standard Deviation 3.9degrees
Change in Hand Range of MotionShea Butter Group-3Standard Deviation 4.2degrees
Rate of Side Effects Using Novel CBD Cream.CBD Group0Participants
Rate of Side Effects Using Novel CBD Cream.Shea Butter Group0Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFirst CBD, Then Shea Butter10
Overall StudySTARTEDFirst Shea Butter, the CBD8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFirst CBD, Then Shea Butter10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFirst Shea Butter, the CBD8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFirst CBD, Then Shea Butter0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFirst Shea Butter, the CBD0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCBD Intervention018
Total, all-cause mortalityShea Butter Intervention018
Total, other adverse eventsCBD Intervention018
Total, other adverse eventsShea Butter Intervention018
Total, serious adverse eventsCBD Intervention018
Total, serious adverse eventsShea Butter Intervention018

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
CBD Group vs Shea Butter Group: Rate of Side Effects Using Novel CBD Cream.Trial comparisons
CBD Intervention vs Shea Butter Intervention: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
CBD Intervention vs Shea Butter Intervention: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04611347

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04611347/registered