ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04645303

Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger

NCT04645303, Early phase 1, Unknown, Dubai Health Authority

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger. Trials, record NCT04645303. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04645303

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT number
NCT04645303
Status
Unknown
Phases
Early phase 1
Enrollment
100 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Dubai Health Authority
Conditions
Trigger Finger
Interventions
hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2 mL), Triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml
First posted
2020-11-27
Last updated
2020-11-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Quinnell trigger finger grading system:1 and 3 months post-injection
Change in Quinnell grading overtime within 3 months after injection. Trigger fingers are rated as follows: Grade 0: normal finger movements, Grade 1: uneven finger movements, Grade 2: actively correctable triggering, Grade 3: passively correctable triggering, and Grade 4: locked digit.
SecondaryVisual analogue scale (VAS) of pain1 and 3 months post-injection
Change in pain Visual analogue scale will be recorded. The patient marks on the 100 mm in length line the point that he/she feels to represent his/her perception of pain at the current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks ( a higher score indicates greater pain intensity). Categorization of none, mild, moderate and severe pain will be also used (none = 0, mild = 1-4, moderate = 5-6, and severe = 7-10).
SecondaryFrequency of tender trigger nodules1 and 3 months post-injectionIdentifying the presence of tender nodules at A1-pulley of the affected finger by palpation
SecondaryThe Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score1 and 3 months post-injection
Patients will be asked to fill a questionnaire form. It is an 11-item form that assesses the upper limb function on a scale of 1-5, with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with the higher scores representing more disability and worse upper limb function.
SecondaryChanges in Grip strength1 and 3 months post-injectionMeasured by the dynamometer strength test (Jamar grip dynamometer)
SecondaryPatient satisfaction with therapy1 and 3 months post-injection
Participating patients will be asked to classify their result into 1 of 4 categories: (1) complete resolution of symptoms, (2) improved result, but incomplete resolution of symptoms, not warranting further treatment, (3) partial response, but unsatisfactory, warranting further treatment, and (4) no response.
SecondaryUltrasound evaluation of A1-Pulley1 and 3 months post-injectionDetailed ultrasonography evaluation of A1-Pulley. Comparing the A1-Pulley ultrasonographic parameters over 3 months after injection (at the follow-up appointment)

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21545190BACKGROUNDPubMed
24895610BACKGROUNDPubMed
26340807BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04645303

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04645303/registered