ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04667377

A Study to Test Whether Different Doses of BI 456906 Help People With Overweight or Obesity to Lose Weight

NCT04667377, Phase 2, Completed, Boehringer Ingelheim; results first posted 2023-11-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Test Whether Different Doses of BI 456906 Help People With Overweight or Obesity to Lose Weight. Trials, record NCT04667377. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04667377

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Test Whether Different Doses of BI 456906 Help People With Overweight or Obesity to Lose Weight
NCT number
NCT04667377
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
387 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Conditions
Obesity
Interventions
BI 456906, Placebo
First posted
2020-12-14
Last updated
2023-11-02
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-002479-37
Results first posted
2023-11-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to Week 46 was modeled using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects for baseline body weight as a continuous linear covariate, and treatment, gender, visit, treatment by visit interaction and baseline by visit interaction as factors, using visit (Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46) as repeated measures, an unstructured covariance matrix to model within subject measurements, adjusted mean (standard error) at Week 46 is reported. For analysis, all available post-baseline body weight measurements (on- and off-treatment) were used, except those for participants who discontinued treatment early due to COVID-19. For these participants only on-treatment values were used. That is, a hypothetical strategy was used for intercurrent event (ICE) "COVID-19 pandemic-related early treatment discontinuation", a treatment policy strategy for ICE "non-pandemic-related early treatment discontinuation".
SecondaryWeight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 46At baseline and at Week 46.
Weight loss of greater than or equal to 5 percent (≥5%) of baseline weight at Week 46 (yes/no), reported as percentage of participants who achieved a weight loss of ≥5% of baseline weight at Week 46. For analysis, all available post-baseline body weight measurements (on- and off-treatment) were used, except those for participants who discontinued treatment early due to COVID-19. For these participants only on-treatment values were used. Percentages were rounded to one decimal place.
SecondaryWeight Loss of ≥ 10% of Baseline Weight at Week 46At baseline and at Week 46.
Weight loss of greater than or equal to 10 percent (≥10%) of baseline weight at Week 46 (yes/no), reported as percentage of participants who achieved a weight loss of ≥10% of baseline weight at Week 46. For analysis, all available post-baseline body weight measurements (on- and off-treatment) were used, except those for participants who discontinued treatment early due to COVID-19. For these participants only on-treatment values were used. Percentages were rounded to one decimal place.
SecondaryWeight Loss of ≥ 15% of Baseline Weight at Week 46At baseline and at Week 46.
Weight loss of greater than or equal to 15 percent (≥15%) of baseline weight at Week 46 (yes/no), reported as percentage of participants who achieved a weight loss of ≥15% of baseline weight at Week 46. For analysis, all available post-baseline body weight measurements (on- and off-treatment) were used, except those for participants who discontinued treatment early due to COVID-19. For these participants only on-treatment values were used. Percentages were rounded to one decimal place.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Absolute change in body weight from baseline to Week 46 was modeled using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects for baseline body weight as a continuous linear covariate, and treatment, gender, visit, treatment by visit interaction and baseline by visit interaction as factors, using visit (Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46) as repeated measures and an unstructured covariance matrix to model within subject measurements, adjusted mean (standard error) at Week 46 is reported. MMRM analysis was performed on the FAS, using planned maintenance treatment (dose assigned at randomisation) and including only on-treatment data, regardless of whether early treatment discontinuation was COVID-19 related.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 32, 40, and 46.
Absolute change in waist circumference from baseline to Week 46 was modeled using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects for baseline waist circumference as a continuous linear covariate, and treatment, gender, visit, treatment by visit interaction and baseline by visit interaction as factors, using visit (Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 32, 40, and 46) as repeated measures and an unstructured covariance matrix to model within subject measurements, adjusted mean (standard error) at Week 46 is reported. MMRM analysis was performed on the FAS, using planned maintenance treatment (dose assigned at randomisation) and including only on-treatment data, regardless of whether early treatment discontinuation was COVID-19 related.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Absolute change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 46 was modeled using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects for baseline systolic blood pressure as a continuous linear covariate, and treatment, gender, visit, treatment by visit interaction and baseline by visit interaction as factors, using visit Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46) as repeated measures and an unstructured covariance matrix to model within subject measurements, adjusted mean (standard error) at Week 46 is reported. MMRM analysis was performed on the FAS, using planned maintenance treatment (dose assigned at randomisation) and including only on-treatment data, regardless of whether early treatment discontinuation was COVID-19 related.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Absolute change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 46 was modeled using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects for baseline diastolic blood pressure as a continuous linear covariate, and treatment, gender, visit, treatment by visit interaction and baseline by visit interaction as factors, using visit Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46) as repeated measures and an unstructured covariance matrix to model within subject measurements, adjusted mean (standard error) at Week 46 is reported. MMRM analysis was performed on the FAS, using planned maintenance treatment (dose assigned at randomisation) and including only on-treatment data, regardless of whether early treatment discontinuation was COVID-19 related.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Full analysis set (all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint) using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Percentage changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYWeight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 46At baseline and at Week 46.
Full analysis set (all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint) using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYWeight Loss of ≥ 10% of Baseline Weight at Week 46At baseline and at Week 46.
Full analysis set (all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint) using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYWeight Loss of ≥ 15% of Baseline Weight at Week 46At baseline and at Week 46.
Full analysis set (all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint) using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Percentage of particpantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Full analysis set (FAS, all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint), using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Kilogram (kg)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 32, 40, and 46.
Full analysis set (FAS, all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint), using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Centimeter (cm)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Full analysis set (FAS, all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint), using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 46Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 46.
Full analysis set (FAS, all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and who have analysable data for at least one efficacy endpoint), using planned maintenance treatment. Number of participants analysed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 460.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment (Maintenance Dose Assigned at Randomisation)-6.19Standard Error 1.07Percentage change
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 462.4 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment-12.51Standard Error 1.01Percentage change
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 463.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment-13.22Standard Error 1.04Percentage change
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 464.8 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment-14.94Standard Error 1.01Percentage change
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 46Placebo-2.82Standard Error 1.06Percentage change
Weight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 460.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment (Maintenance Dose Assigned at Randomisation)60.7Percentage of participants
Weight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 462.4 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment81.0Percentage of participants
Weight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 463.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment82.0Percentage of participants
Weight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 464.8 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment82.8Percentage of participants
Weight Loss of ≥ 5% of Baseline Weight at Week 46Placebo25.9Percentage of participants

Participant flow35

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Dose Escalation PeriodSTARTED0.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment (Maintenance Dose Assigned at Randomisation)78
Dose Escalation PeriodSTARTED2.4 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment78
Dose Escalation PeriodSTARTED3.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment77
Dose Escalation PeriodSTARTED4.8 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment77
Dose Escalation PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo77
Dose Escalation PeriodTreated During Dose Escalation Period0.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment (Maintenance Dose Assigned at Randomisation)77
Dose Escalation PeriodTreated During Dose Escalation Period2.4 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment78
Dose Escalation PeriodTreated During Dose Escalation Period3.6 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment77
Dose Escalation PeriodTreated During Dose Escalation Period4.8 mg BI 456906 - Planned Maintenance Treatment77
Dose Escalation PeriodTreated During Dose Escalation PeriodPlacebo77

Adverse events230

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders0.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment492
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders2.4 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment492
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders3.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment771
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders4.8 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment354
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo377
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment492
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2.4 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment1092
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disorders3.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment571
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disorders4.8 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment354
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo177

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality0.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment092
Total, all-cause mortality2.4 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment092
Total, all-cause mortality3.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment071
Total, all-cause mortality4.8 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment054
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo077
Total, other adverse events0.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment7092
Total, other adverse events2.4 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment7992
Total, other adverse events3.6 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment6471
Total, other adverse events4.8 mg BI 456906 - Actual Maintenance Treatment4654
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo4877

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
38330987DERIVEDPubMed
39821928DERIVEDPubMed
42331726DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04667377

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04667377/results?page=2