ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04675151

Safety and Efficacy of Nyxol With Pilocarpine Eye Drops in Subjects With Presbyopia

NCT04675151, Phase 2, Completed, Opus Genetics, Inc; results first posted 2023-08-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Nyxol With Pilocarpine Eye Drops in Subjects With Presbyopia. Trials, record NCT04675151. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04675151

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Nyxol With Pilocarpine Eye Drops in Subjects With Presbyopia
NCT number
NCT04675151
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
150 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Opus Genetics, Inc
Conditions
Presbyopia
Interventions
Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution 0.75%, Pilocarpine, Placebo
First posted
2020-12-19
Last updated
2026-10-30
Results first posted
2023-08-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Photopic Binocular DCNVAVisit 2 at 1 hour
The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent of subjects with ≥ 15 letters of improvement in photopic binocular DCNVA on Visit 2 at 1 hour with POS + LDP compared to placebo alone. The improvement in binocular DCNVA for each subject was relative to the subject's own baseline value (Visit 1).
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselineVisit 2 at 0.5 hours, at 2 hours, at 3 hours, at 4 hours, and at 6 hoursThe percentage of subjects with improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letters in DCNVA (photopic) from Baseline at 0.5 hours, at 2 hours, at 3 hours, at 4 hours, and at 6 hours
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) at 1 Hour and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Photopic Binocular BCDVA From BaselineVisit 2 at 1 hourThe percentage of subjects with improvement of ≥ 15 letters in DCNVA (photopic) at 1 hour and with \< 5 letters of loss in photopic binocular BCDVA from Baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Improvement in DCIVA (Photopic) From BaselineVisit 2 at 1 hour, at 3 hours, and at 6 hoursThe percentage of subjects with improvement in DCIVA (photopic) from Baseline of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letters

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Photopic Binocular DCNVAVisit 2 at 1 hourpercentage of subjects with ≥ 15 lettersNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselineVisit 2 at 0.5 hours, at 2 hours, at 3 hours, at 4 hours, and at 6 hourspercentage of subjects with improvementNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) at 1 Hour and With < 5 Letters of Loss in Photopic Binocular BCDVA From BaselineVisit 2 at 1 hour% of subjects with improvementNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Improvement in DCIVA (Photopic) From BaselineVisit 2 at 1 hour, at 3 hours, and at 6 hourspercentage with improvementNUMBER

Results by group104

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Photopic Binocular DCNVAPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%60.5percentage of subjects with ≥ 15 letters
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Photopic Binocular DCNVAPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle30.0percentage of subjects with ≥ 15 letters
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Photopic Binocular DCNVAPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%45.2percentage of subjects with ≥ 15 letters
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 15 Letters of Improvement in Photopic Binocular DCNVAPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle27.3percentage of subjects with ≥ 15 letters
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselinePOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%% of subjects with improvement of ≥ 5 letters from baseline at 0.5 hours88.4percentage of subjects with improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselinePOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle% of subjects with improvement of ≥ 5 letters from baseline at 0.5 hours86.7percentage of subjects with improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselinePOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%% of subjects with improvement of ≥ 5 letters from baseline at 0.5 hours74.2percentage of subjects with improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselinePOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle% of subjects with improvement of ≥ 5 letters from baseline at 0.5 hours70.5percentage of subjects with improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselinePOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%% of subjects with improvement of ≥ 10 letters from baseline at 0.5 hours76.7percentage of subjects with improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement of ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 Letters in DCNVA (Photopic) From BaselinePOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle% of subjects with improvement of ≥ 10 letters from baseline at 0.5 hours50.0percentage of subjects with improvement

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%44
Overall StudySTARTEDPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle30
Overall StudySTARTEDPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%31
Overall StudySTARTEDPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle45
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%43
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle30
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%31
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle44
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle0

Adverse events64

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInstillation site erythemaGeneral disordersPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%6446
otherInstillation site erythemaGeneral disordersPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle3303
otherInstillation site erythemaGeneral disordersPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%2312
otherInstillation site erythemaGeneral disordersPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle0450
otherInstallation site painGeneral disordersPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%4444
otherInstallation site painGeneral disordersPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle3303
otherInstallation site painGeneral disordersPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%0310
otherInstallation site painGeneral disordersPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle1451
otherInstallation site pruritusGeneral disordersPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%1441
otherInstallation site pruritusGeneral disordersPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle0300

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%044
Total, all-cause mortalityPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle030
Total, all-cause mortalityPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%031
Total, all-cause mortalityPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle045
Total, other adverse eventsPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%1544
Total, other adverse eventsPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle630
Total, other adverse eventsPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP 0.4%631
Total, other adverse eventsPOS Vehicle First, Then LDP Vehicle245
Total, serious adverse eventsPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP 0.4%044
Total, serious adverse eventsPOS 0.75% First, Then LDP Vehicle030

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04675151

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04675151/results?page=2