Trial · NCT04680195
Registered outcomes21
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 21
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding one month after thalidomide treatment | the first month after thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding one month during thalidomide treatment | the first month during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding two months during thalidomide treatment | the second month during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding three months during thalidomide treatment | the third month during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding four months during thalidomide treatment | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding three months after thalidomide treatment | the third month after thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Remission rate of rectal bleeding six months after thalidomide treatment | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment | Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious. |
| Secondary | Endoscopic score one month during thalidomide treatment | the first month during thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. |
| Secondary | Endoscopic score four months during thalidomide treatment | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. |
| Secondary | Endoscopic score one month after thalidomide treatment | the first month after thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. |
| Secondary | Endoscopic score three months after thalidomide treatment | the third month after thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. |
| Secondary | Endoscopic score six months after thalidomide treatment | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment | Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient one month during thalidomide treatment | the first month during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflect the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient two months during thalidomide treatment | the second month during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient three months during thalidomide treatment | the third month during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient four months during thalidomide treatment | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient one month after thalidomide treatment | the first month after thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient three months after thalidomide treatment | the third month after thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Quality of life of the patient six months after thalidomide treatment | the sixth month after thalidomide treatment | Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life. |
| Secondary | Incidence of adverse events four months during thalidomide treatment | the fourth month during thalidomide treatment | Including adverse reactions of thalidomide and other adverse events |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04680195/registered