ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04684524

Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)

NCT04684524, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2025-12-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Trials, record NCT04684524. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04684524

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
NCT number
NCT04684524
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
62 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Conditions
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis
Interventions
Dupilumab SAR231893, Placebo
First posted
2020-12-24
Last updated
2026-09-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-002999-12
Results first posted
2025-12-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes23

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Week 52
The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of \<=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function; i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPSBaseline (Day 1) and Week 52
The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52
The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Week 52
The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Outcomes23

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Week 52The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPSBaseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom DiaryBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52The ITT population included all randomized participants.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Week 52The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at baseline and Week 52 are reported.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group72

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScorePlacebo-1.81Standard Error 0.81score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScoreDupilumab-9.17Standard Error 0.74score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom DiaryPlacebo-0.43Standard Error 0.13score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom DiaryDupilumab-1.30Standard Error 0.11score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)Placebo-0.80Standard Error 0.38score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)Dupilumab-3.16Standard Error 0.34score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScorePlacebo-1.93Standard Error 0.82score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK ScoreDupilumab-7.38Standard Error 0.80score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom DiaryPlacebo-1.26Standard Error 0.35score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom DiaryDupilumab-3.45Standard Error 0.31score on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo29
Overall StudySTARTEDDupilumab33
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedPlacebo28
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedDupilumab33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDupilumab29
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDupilumab4

Adverse events30

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo4284
otherCovid-19Infections and infestationsDupilumab5335
otherSuspected Covid-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo0280
otherSuspected Covid-19Infections and infestationsDupilumab2332
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo0280
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDupilumab2332
otherAllergic Fungal RhinosinusitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo6287
otherAllergic Fungal RhinosinusitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersDupilumab1331
otherAsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo2284
otherAsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersDupilumab0330

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo028
Total, all-cause mortalityDupilumab033
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1528
Total, other adverse eventsDupilumab1633
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo328
Total, serious adverse eventsDupilumab033

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
42498125DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Dupilumab vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Dupilumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to DupilumabTrial comparisons
Dupilumab vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04684524

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04684524/registered?page=2