Trial ยท NCT04684524
Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
NCT04684524, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2025-12-22
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Trials, record NCT04684524. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04684524
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)
- NCT number
- NCT04684524
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 62 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Conditions
- Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis
- Interventions
- Dupilumab SAR231893, Placebo
- First posted
- 2020-12-24
- Last updated
- 2026-09-03
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2020-002999-12
- Results first posted
- 2025-12-22
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes23
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52 | The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24 | The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 | The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 | The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24 | The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 | The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of \<=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function; i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24 | The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPS | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52 | The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52 | The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52 | The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. |
1 to 10 of 23Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 23 registered outcomesOutcomes23
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52 | The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPS | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52 | The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at baseline and Week 52 are reported. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
1 to 10 of 23Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 23 outcomesResults by group72
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Placebo | -1.81 | Standard Error 0.81 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Dupilumab | -9.17 | Standard Error 0.74 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Placebo | -0.43 | Standard Error 0.13 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Dupilumab | -1.30 | Standard Error 0.11 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) | Placebo | -0.80 | Standard Error 0.38 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) | Dupilumab | -3.16 | Standard Error 0.34 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Placebo | -1.93 | Standard Error 0.82 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | Dupilumab | -7.38 | Standard Error 0.80 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Placebo | -1.26 | Standard Error 0.35 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary | Dupilumab | -3.45 | Standard Error 0.31 | score on a scale |
1 to 10 of 72Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 72 results by groupParticipant flow8
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 29 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Dupilumab | 33 | |
| Overall Study | Randomized and Treated | Placebo | 28 | |
| Overall Study | Randomized and Treated | Dupilumab | 33 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 21 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Dupilumab | 29 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo | 8 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Dupilumab | 4 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events30
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 4 | 28 | 4 |
| other | Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | Dupilumab | 5 | 33 | 5 |
| other | Suspected Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 0 | 28 | 0 |
| other | Suspected Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | Dupilumab | 2 | 33 | 2 |
| other | Headache | Nervous system disorders | Placebo | 0 | 28 | 0 |
| other | Headache | Nervous system disorders | Dupilumab | 2 | 33 | 2 |
| other | Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Placebo | 6 | 28 | 7 |
| other | Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Dupilumab | 1 | 33 | 1 |
| other | Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Placebo | 2 | 28 | 4 |
| other | Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Dupilumab | 0 | 33 | 0 |
1 to 10 of 30Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 30 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | 0 | 28 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Dupilumab | 0 | 33 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 15 | 28 |
| Total, other adverse events | Dupilumab | 16 | 33 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 3 | 28 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Dupilumab | 0 | 33 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 42498125 | DERIVED |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons3
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Dupilumab vs Placebo: deaths from any cause | Trial comparisons |
| Dupilumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Dupilumab | Trial comparisons |
| Dupilumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04684524
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04684524/registered?page=2