ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04697069

A Study to Evaluate of the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Acneiform Rash

NCT04697069, Phase 2, Terminated, Vanda Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2023-01-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate of the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Acneiform Rash. Trials, record NCT04697069. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04697069

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate of the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in the Treatment of Acneiform Rash
NCT number
NCT04697069
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
4 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Vanda Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Acneiform Eruptions
Interventions
Imsidolimab, Placebo
First posted
2021-01-06
Last updated
2025-09-22
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-003494-22
Results first posted
2023-01-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Count (Papules and Pustules) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The number of facial inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules) on the face (excluding the neck and scalp area) was counted. Papule was a small, solid elevation 5 millimeters (mm) or less in diameter. Pastule was a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Count (Papules and Pustules) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The number of facial inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules) on the face (excluding the neck and scalp area) was counted. Papule was a small, solid elevation 5 mm or less in diameter. Pastule was a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade From Baseline in Acneiform Rash Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grading Scale at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The acneiform rash CTCAE grading scale of severity was 6-point scale ranging from 0-5. Scale 0=no evidence of rash. Scale 1= papules and/or pustules covering \<10% body surface area (BSA), which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness. Scale 2=papules and/or pustules covering 10-30% BSA, which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness; associated with psychosocial impact; limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); papules and/or pustules covering \>30% BSA with or without mild symptoms. Scale 3=papules and/or pustules covering \>30% BSA with moderate or severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; associated with local superinfection with oral antibiotics. Scale 4=life-threatening consequences; papules and/or pustules covering any %BSA, which may or may not be associated with symptoms of pruritus or tenderness and are associated with extensive superinfection with intravenous (IV) antibiotics indicated. Scale 5=death.
SecondaryTime to First Response of 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Acneiform Rash CTCAE Grading ScaleBaseline up to 55 days
Time to first response of 1 grade improvement from baseline on the acneiform rash CTCAE grading scale: Date of the first response of 1 grade improvement from baseline on the acneiform rash CTCAE grading scale - Date of the first dose of study treatment (or from randomization for any participant randomized but not treated) + 1.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade From Baseline in Acneiform Rash Modified Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) EGFRi Skin Toxicity Tool (MESTT) Grading Scale (Total Score) at Week 8
Baseline, Week 8
The MESTT grading scale of the acneiform rash severity was a 3-point scale ranging from 1 to 3: Scale 1 = 1A: papules or pustules ≤5; OR 1 area of erythema or edema \<1 centimeter (cm) in size. 1B: papules or pustules ≤5; OR 1 area of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size; AND pain or pruritus. Scale 2 = 2A: papules or pustules 6-20; OR 2-5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size. 2B: Papules or pustules 6-20; OR 2-5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size; AND pain, pruritus, or effect on emotions or functioning. Scale 3 = 3A: papules or pustules \> 20; OR more than 5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size. 3B: papules or pustules \> 20; OR more than 5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size; AND pain, pruritus, or effect on emotions or functioning. Grading was performed individually for the face, scalp, chest, and back. The sum of all body region scores yielded the total score (range: 4 to 12).
SecondaryTime to First Response of 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Acneiform Rash Modified MESTT Grading Scale (Total Score)Baseline to 55 days
Time to first response of 1 grade improvement from baseline on the acneiform rash modified MESTT grading scale (total score): Date of onset of the first response of 1 grade improvement from baseline on the acneiform rash modified MESTT grading scale (total score) - Date of the first dose of study treatment (or from randomization for any participant randomized but not treated) + 1.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade From Baseline in Acneiform Rash Modified MESTT Grading Scale (Facial Assessment) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The MESTT grading scale of the acneiform rash severity was a 3-point scale ranging from 1 to 3: Scale 1 = 1A: papules or pustules ≤5; OR 1 area of erythema or edema \<1cm in size. 1B: papules or pustules ≤5; OR 1 area of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size; AND pain or pruritus. Scale 2 = 2A: papules or pustules 6-20; OR 2-5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size. 2B: Papules or pustules 6-20; OR 2-5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size; AND pain, pruritus, or effect on emotions or functioning. Scale 3 = 3A: papules or pustules \> 20; OR more than 5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size. 3B: papules or pustules \> 20; OR more than 5 areas of erythema or edema \<1 cm in size; AND pain, pruritus, or effect on emotions or functioning. Grading was performed individually for the face. The score ranged from 1 to 3.
SecondaryTime to First Response of 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Acneiform Rash Modified MESTT Grading Scale (Facial Assessment)Baseline to 55 days
Time to first response of 1 grade improvement from baseline on the acneiform rash modified MESTT grading scale (facial assessment): Date of onset of the first response of 1 grade improvement from baseline on the acneiform rash modified MESTT grading scale (facial assessment) - Date of the first dose of study treatment (or from randomization for any participant randomized but not treated) + 1.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The intensity of pruritus was evaluated by asking participants to assign a numerical score representing the worst intensity over the last 24 hours of their symptoms on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst imaginable itch.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus NRS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The intensity of pruritus was evaluated by asking participants to assign a numerical score representing the worst intensity over the last 24 hours of their symptoms on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst imaginable itch.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Count (Papules and Pustules) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Count (Papules and Pustules) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade From Baseline in Acneiform Rash Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grading Scale at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYTime to First Response of 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Acneiform Rash CTCAE Grading ScaleBaseline up to 55 days
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade From Baseline in Acneiform Rash Modified Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) EGFRi Skin Toxicity Tool (MESTT) Grading Scale (Total Score) at Week 8
Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYTime to First Response of 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Acneiform Rash Modified MESTT Grading Scale (Total Score)Baseline to 55 days
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade From Baseline in Acneiform Rash Modified MESTT Grading Scale (Facial Assessment) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYTime to First Response of 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Acneiform Rash Modified MESTT Grading Scale (Facial Assessment)Baseline to 55 days
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus NRS at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Due to early study termination, no participant was evaluated in the imsidolimab group and 1 participant was evaluated in the placebo group. Since only 1 participant was evaluated, results were not reported for the protection of personal data and to avoid re-identification.

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsImsidolimabAny TEAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPlaceboAny TEAEs2Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsImsidolimabSerious TEAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPlaceboSerious TEAEs0Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDImsidolimab2
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImsidolimab0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImsidolimab2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersImsidolimab02
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo12
otherElectrocardiogram T wave inversionInvestigationsImsidolimab02
otherElectrocardiogram T wave inversionInvestigationsPlacebo12
otherHypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersImsidolimab02
otherHypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo12

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityImsidolimab02
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo02
Total, other adverse eventsImsidolimab02
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo22
Total, serious adverse eventsImsidolimab02
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo02

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Imsidolimab vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Imsidolimab vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04697069

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04697069/registered