ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04706793

Oral Etrasimod Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Adult Japanese Participants (ELEVATE UC 40 JAPAN)

NCT04706793, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2023-10-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Oral Etrasimod Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Adult Japanese Participants (ELEVATE UC 40 JAPAN). Trials, record NCT04706793. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04706793

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Oral Etrasimod Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Adult Japanese Participants (ELEVATE UC 40 JAPAN)
NCT number
NCT04706793
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
42 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Etrasimod, Placebo
First posted
2021-01-13
Last updated
2023-10-16
Results first posted
2023-10-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Clinical remission was based on the modified Mayo score (MMS). The MMS is a composite score of 3 assessments consisting of participant-reported symptoms using daily electronic (e)-diary and centrally read endoscopy: stool frequency (SF), rectal bleeding (RB) and endoscopic score (ES). Clinical remission was defined as SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1-point decrease from Baseline), RB sub-score = 0, and ES less than or equal to (\<=) 1 (excluding friability). Each component sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Endoscopic improvement was defined as an ES \<=1 (excluding friability) at Week 40 of APD334-308 compared with Week 12 of APD334-302. The ES ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal/inactive disease and 3 = severe disease); higher score indicated more severe disease.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Symptomatic remission was defined as an SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a \>= 1 point decrease from Baseline) and RB sub-score = 0. The SF sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal) and RB sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = no blood and 3 = blood alone passes). Higher scores indicated more severe disease.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Mucosal healing was defined as an ES \<= 1 (excluding friability) with histologic remission measured by a Geboes Index score less than \[\<\] 2.0). The ES ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal/inactive disease and 3 = severe disease). The Geboes score grading system, was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants, Who Had Not Been Receiving Corticosteroids for ≥ 12 Weeks, Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at C5041015 (APD334-302) Study Entry
Week 40 of APD334-308
Clinical remission was based on the modified Mayo score (MMS). The MMS is a composite score of 3 assessments consisting of participant-reported symptoms using daily electronic (e)-diary and centrally read endoscopy: stool frequency (SF), rectal bleeding (RB) and endoscopic score (ES). Clinical remission was defined as SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1-point decrease from Baseline), RB sub-score = 0, and ES less than or equal to (\<=) 1 (excluding friability). Each component sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Clinical RemissionWeek 40 of APD334-308
Clinical remission was based on the modified Mayo score (MMS). The MMS is a composite score of 3 assessments consisting of participant-reported symptoms using daily electronic (e)-diary and centrally read endoscopy: stool frequency (SF), rectal bleeding (RB) and endoscopic score (ES). Clinical remission was defined as SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1-point decrease from Baseline), RB sub-score = 0, and ES less than or equal to (\<=) 1 (excluding friability). Each component sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. A subject with sustained clinical remission is defined as someone who achieved clinical remission at both Week 12 of APD334-302 and Week 40 of APD334-308.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Full Analysis Set Population (All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention). Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Full Analysis Set Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Full Analysis Set Population. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Week 40 of APD334-308
Full Analysis Set Population. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants, Who Had Not Been Receiving Corticosteroids for ≥ 12 Weeks, Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at C5041015 (APD334-302) Study Entry
Week 40 of APD334-308
Full Analysis Set Population. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Clinical RemissionWeek 40 of APD334-308
Full Analysis Set Population. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Placebo Comparator: Placebo7.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg25.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Placebo Comparator: Placebo7.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg35.7Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Placebo Comparator: Placebo7.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg39.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Placebo Comparator: Placebo7.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 40 of Study APD334-308Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg28.6Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants, Who Had Not Been Receiving Corticosteroids for ≥ 12 Weeks, Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at C5041015 (APD334-302) Study Entry
Placebo Comparator: Placebo7.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants, Who Had Not Been Receiving Corticosteroids for ≥ 12 Weeks, Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 40 of Study APD334-308 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at C5041015 (APD334-302) Study Entry
Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg25.0Percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
TreatmentSTARTEDPlacebo Comparator: Placebo14
TreatmentSTARTEDExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg28
TreatmentCOMPLETEDPlacebo Comparator: Placebo4
TreatmentCOMPLETEDExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg18
TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Comparator: Placebo10
TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg10
Follow-upSTARTEDPlacebo Comparator: Placebo14
Follow-upSTARTEDExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg28
Follow-upCOMPLETEDPlacebo Comparator: Placebo4
Follow-upCOMPLETEDExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg18

Adverse events38

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherColitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Comparator: Placebo1142
otherColitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disordersExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg2282
otherStomatitisGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Comparator: Placebo1142
otherStomatitisGastrointestinal disordersExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg0280
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo Comparator: Placebo2142
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg3283
otherMalaiseGeneral disordersPlacebo Comparator: Placebo0140
otherMalaiseGeneral disordersExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg3284
otherVaccination site painGeneral disordersPlacebo Comparator: Placebo0140
otherVaccination site painGeneral disordersExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg2283

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Comparator: Placebo014
Total, all-cause mortalityExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg028
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Comparator: Placebo814
Total, other adverse eventsExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg1628
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Comparator: Placebo114
Total, serious adverse eventsExperimental: Etrasimod 2 mg128

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
42248437DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg vs Placebo Comparator: Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Experimental: Etrasimod 2 mg vs Placebo Comparator: Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04706793

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04706793/events?page=2