ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04732949

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Interferon-β Therapy for COVID-19

NCT04732949, Phase 3, Completed, Synairgen Research Ltd.; results first posted 2023-03-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Interferon-β Therapy for COVID-19. Trials, record NCT04732949. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04732949

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Interferon-β Therapy for COVID-19
NCT number
NCT04732949
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
623 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Synairgen Research Ltd.
Conditions
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, COVID-19
Interventions
SNG001, Placebo
First posted
2021-02-01
Last updated
2023-03-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-004743-83
Results first posted
2023-03-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime to Hospital DischargeDay 28The time to hospital discharge in patients with moderate COVID-19 after administration of SNG001 compared to placebo was evaluated.
PrimaryTime to RecoveryDay 28Recovery in patients with moderate COVID-19 after administration of SNG001 compared to placebo by time to recovery was evaluated.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who Progressed to Severe Disease or DeathUntil Day 35
The efficacy of SNG001 compared to placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 by assessing progression to severe disease or death was evaluated. Severe disease was defined by the Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI) as a score between 5 and 7. Death was defined by an OSCI score of 8.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who Were Intubated or Who DiedUntil Day 35
The efficacy of SNG001 compared to placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 by assessing progression to intubation or death was evaluated. Intubation was defined by the OSCI as a score between 6 and 7. Death was defined by an OSCI score of 8.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who Died Within 35 Days of First DoseUntil Day 35 of first dosePatients who died within 35 days of first dose of study intervention were calculated.
SecondaryCumulative Number of Patients Who Were Discharged From HospitalDays 7, 14, 21 and 28The efficacy of SNG001 compared to placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 was assessed by hospital discharge on given days.
SecondaryCumulative Number of Patients With RecoveryDays 7, 14, 21 and 28
The efficacy of SNG001 compared to placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 by assessing recovery was evaluated. Recovery is defined as no limitation of activities according to the Ordinal Scale of Clinical Improvement (OSCI), with no rebound at subsequent assessments.
SecondaryImprovement Based on Entire WHO OSCI ScoreUntil Day 35
The efficacy of SNG001 compared to placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 by assessing improvement across the entire WHO OSCI were evaluated. Improvement in clinical status is based on the 9-point OSCI score. The score ranges from 0 to 8, where lower score of 0 represents no clinical or virological evidence of infection and higher score of 8 represents death.Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Score According to the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS)Baseline to Day 15
The efficacy of SNG001 compared with placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 by assessing changes in daily breathlessness, cough and sputum scores on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) up to 4 (severe symptoms) was evaluated. Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum is graded on a score from 0 to 4, where a higher score indicates worse symptoms. The total score is calculated by summing the individual scores and is therefore graded on a scale from 0 to 12. Change in value of BCSS total scale, with negative value indicates an improvement in symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) During the Hospitalisation PeriodDay 1 until Day 28
The efficacy of SNG001 compared to placebo in patients with moderate COVID-19 by assessing changes in NEWS2 during hospitalisation period was evaluated. It is the sum of scores calculated for Respiratory rate, Oxygen Saturation, Systolic BP, Pulse and Temperature when graded on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 means a normal assessment and a higher score indicates a greater deviation from normal . 2 more points are added if the patient is receiving oxygen and 3 further points are added if the patient has new-onset confusion, disorientation and/or agitation, where previously their mental state was normal. This gives a score between 0 and 20. Higher scores indicates high clinical risk. Change from baseline in NEWS-2 score, in negative values favors improvement.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTime to Hospital DischargeDay 28The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.daysMEDIAN
PRIMARYTime to RecoveryDay 28The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Who Progressed to Severe Disease or DeathUntil Day 35The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients. Here, the number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data that were analyzed for this outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Who Were Intubated or Who DiedUntil Day 35The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Who Died Within 35 Days of First DoseUntil Day 35 of first doseThe ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCumulative Number of Patients Who Were Discharged From HospitalDays 7, 14, 21 and 28The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCumulative Number of Patients With RecoveryDays 7, 14, 21 and 28The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYImprovement Based on Entire WHO OSCI ScoreUntil Day 35ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Score According to the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS)Baseline to Day 15The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) During the Hospitalisation PeriodDay 1 until Day 28The ITT analysis population consisted of all randomised patients. Here, the number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data that were analyzed for this outcome measure.score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group244

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Time to Hospital DischargeSNG0017.095% Confidence Interval 7.0 to 8.0days
Time to Hospital DischargePlacebo8.095% Confidence Interval 7.0 to 9.0days
Time to RecoverySNG00125.095% Confidence Interval 22.0 to NAdays
Time to RecoveryPlacebo25.095% Confidence Interval 22.0 to NAdays
Number of Patients Who Progressed to Severe Disease or DeathSNG00133Participants
Number of Patients Who Progressed to Severe Disease or DeathPlacebo45Participants
Number of Patients Who Were Intubated or Who DiedSNG00120Participants
Number of Patients Who Were Intubated or Who DiedPlacebo23Participants
Number of Patients Who Died Within 35 Days of First DoseSNG00114Participants
Number of Patients Who Died Within 35 Days of First DosePlacebo17Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSNG001309
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo314
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSNG001233
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo231
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSNG00176
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo83

Adverse events138

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersSNG0017130184
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo6130376
otherAnosmiaNervous system disordersSNG0011830118
otherAnosmiaNervous system disordersPlacebo2030320
otherAgeusiaNervous system disordersSNG0011330113
otherAgeusiaNervous system disordersPlacebo1830319
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersSNG0012530126
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo93039
otherProductive coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersSNG0017030178
otherProductive coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo7230385

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySNG00116309
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo18314
Total, other adverse eventsSNG001250301
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo248303
Total, serious adverse eventsSNG00138301
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo55303

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
SNG001 vs Placebo: Number of Patients Who Were Intubated or Who DiedTrial comparisons
SNG001 vs Placebo: Number of Patients Who Died Within 35 Days of First DoseTrial comparisons
SNG001 vs Placebo: Number of Patients Who Progressed to Severe Disease or DeathTrial comparisons
SNG001 vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
SNG001 vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04732949

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04732949/results?page=2