ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04750395

Comparing Haloperidol and Olanzapine in Treating Terminal Delirium

NCT04750395, Phase 2, Unknown, HCA Hospice Care

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparing Haloperidol and Olanzapine in Treating Terminal Delirium. Trials, record NCT04750395. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04750395

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparing Haloperidol and Olanzapine in Treating Terminal Delirium
NCT number
NCT04750395
Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
80 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
HCA Hospice Care
Conditions
Delirium, Terminal Illness
Interventions
Haloperidol Solution, Olanzapine Tablets
First posted
2021-02-11
Last updated
2023-03-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySeverity of agitation, measured by the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS)72 hours
MDAS is a ten-item, four-point clinician-rated scale designed to quantify the severity of delirium in medically-ill patients (range 1 - 40). Items included in the scale reflect the diagnostic criteria for delirium in the DSM-IV. It has very good psychometric proper-ties, with high reliability (r = .91) and good Discriminant and Concurrent validity. Though the scale was intended to assess patients based on all ten items, it was suggested that items in MDAS can be pro-rated in the event the patient is not able to communicate. The higher the score, the more severe the agitation.
PrimarySeverity of terminal delirium, measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale modified for palliative care (RASS-PAL)72 hours
The RASS is a simple observational instrument assessing levels of sedation and agitation. It requires no patient input and ranges from +4 (overly combative) to -5 (unarousable). It is considered less time-consuming and easier to use than other similar instruments. Developed for adult intensive care unit patients, the scale demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability in that setting. A modified version was de-signed for use in the palliative care setting, which produced acceptable psychometric properties. Hui et. al. (2018) had caregivers using the RASS to assess patients, which gave ratings similar to clinicians.
SecondaryAdverse effects or toxicity, measured by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE)0-72 hours
Possible side effects of taking either drugs are over sedation and extrapyramidal symptoms; these include akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder, and spasticity. To track these adverse events and their severity, the clinician investigator will providing ratings of observed adverse events using the scale provided by the criteria. Each symptom is scored between 0 (No symptom) to 3 (Severe).

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers19

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
9114631BACKGROUNDPubMed
10870073BACKGROUNDPubMed
11434730BACKGROUNDPubMed
15016923BACKGROUNDPubMed
22271539BACKGROUNDPubMed
23460093BACKGROUNDPubMed
23631612BACKGROUNDPubMed
24388124BACKGROUNDPubMed
24480529BACKGROUNDPubMed
24605197BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 19

See all 19 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04750395

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04750395/registered