ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04764669

A Study of E2027 in Participants With Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB) or Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD) With or Without Amyloid Copathology

NCT04764669, Phase 2, Completed, Eisai Inc.; results first posted 2022-09-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of E2027 in Participants With Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB) or Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD) With or Without Amyloid Copathology. Trials, record NCT04764669. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04764669

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of E2027 in Participants With Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB) or Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD) With or Without Amyloid Copathology
NCT number
NCT04764669
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
34 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Conditions
Lewy Body Disease, Parkinson Disease
Interventions
E2027
First posted
2021-02-21
Last updated
2022-09-26
Results first posted
2022-09-26
Limitations and caveats
Due to insufficient numbers enrolled of participants with PDD and amyloid copathology, interpretation of results in this subgroup is limited.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at Week 9Baseline, Week 9
cGMP was measured in CSF samples using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantitative at 0.500 nanogram per milliliter (ng/ml). Evaluation of cGMP following dosing of E2027 was based on relative percent change from baseline.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16
A TEAE was defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment or reemerged during treatment, having been present at pretreatment but stopped before treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE is continuous. Severe TEAE was defined as inability to work or to perform normal daily activity. A Serious TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; life threatening condition; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an investigational product. AE resulting in study discontinuation was defined as AE due to which the study medication was stopped.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Orthostatic HypotensionWeek 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12 and Week 16
Orthostatic hypotension was defined based on the following criteria per protocol: Drop in standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) compared to supine or drop in standing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>=10 mmHg compared to supine. Treatment-emergent orthostatic hypotension was defined as: if at baseline participant did not have SBP drop \>=20 mmHg and no DBP drop \>=10 mmHg, but developed one or more of these two events during post baseline visits.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Post Baseline Treatment Emergent Orthostatic TachycardiaFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16
Orthostatic tachycardia was defined by the following criteria per protocol: Standing heart rate (HR) increased by greater than (\>) 30 beats/min compared to supine and absolute standing HR was \>100 beats/min. A participant was counted as treatment-emergent if orthostatic tachycardia emerged during the treatment, having been absent at baseline (pretreatment).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory ValuesFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16
A laboratory value was determined to be a markedly abnormal value if the postbaseline grade increased from baseline and the post-baseline grade was greater than or equal to 2. Markedly abnormal laboratory values were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16
Abnormal ECG findings were defined as follows: corrected QT interval calculated using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) prolonged by \>60 millisecond (ms) from baseline and absolute QTcF \>450 ms; QTcF prolonged to \>500 ms; Change from baseline of PR interval \>=25 percent (%) to an absolute PR value of \>220 ms; Change from baseline of QRS interval \>=25% to an absolute QRS value of \>120 ms.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Measured Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)From first dose of study drug up to Week 16
The C-SSRS (mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories); is an interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. C-SSRS assess whether participant experience any of the following: completed suicide; suicide attempt (response of "yes" on "actual attempt"); preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior ("yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior", "aborted attempt" or "interrupted attempt"), suicidal ideation ("yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent, any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent ("yes" on "has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). Here, number of participants with positive response ("yes") to suicidal behavior or/and Ideation, any non-suicidal self-injurious behavior was reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Score of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III: Motor Examination (UPDRS-III)Baseline, Week 12 and Week 16
The UPDRS scale evaluates extrapyramidal features in motor function in Parkinson's disease. It contains 33 items in 18 categories: (1) speech, (2) facial expression, (3) rigidity, (4) finger tapping, (5) hand movements, (6) supinational and pronation movements of hands, (7) toe tapping, (8) leg agility, (9) arising from chair, (10) gait, (11) freezing of gait, (12) postural stability, (13) posture, (14) body bradykinesia, (15) postural tremor of hands, (16) kinetic tremor of hands, (17) rest tremor amplitude and (18) constancy of rest tremor. Each item is scored 0 to 4, giving a total score range 0 to 132. Higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at Week 9Baseline, Week 9Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set included participants who had sufficient PD data to derive at least 1 PD parameter.Percent Change in CSF (ng/mL)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Orthostatic HypotensionWeek 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12 and Week 16Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Post Baseline Treatment Emergent Orthostatic TachycardiaFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory ValuesFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment. Number analyzed n are the participants who were evaluable for the outcome measure for given categories.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 16Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Measured Using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)From first dose of study drug up to Week 16Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Score of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III: Motor Examination (UPDRS-III)Baseline, Week 12 and Week 16
Safety analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment. Here number analyzed n are the participants who were evaluable for the outcome measure for given time points.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group120

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at Week 9DLB Without Amyloid Copathology230.412Standard Error 20.417Percent Change in CSF (ng/mL)
Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at Week 9DLB With Amyloid Copathology250.434Standard Error 17.015Percent Change in CSF (ng/mL)
Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at Week 9PDD Without Amyloid Copathology186.869Standard Error 24.374Percent Change in CSF (ng/mL)
Percent Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at Week 9PDD With Amyloid Copathology362.519Standard Error 40.764Percent Change in CSF (ng/mL)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationDLB Without Amyloid CopathologyTEAEs6Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationDLB With Amyloid CopathologyTEAEs4Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationPDD Without Amyloid CopathologyTEAEs3Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationPDD With Amyloid CopathologyTEAEs2Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationDLB Without Amyloid CopathologySevere TEAEs1Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Severe TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study DiscontinuationDLB With Amyloid CopathologySevere TEAEs0Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDLB Without Amyloid Copathology10
Overall StudySTARTEDDLB With Amyloid Copathology11
Overall StudySTARTEDPDD Without Amyloid Copathology10
Overall StudySTARTEDPDD With Amyloid Copathology3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDLB Without Amyloid Copathology7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDLB With Amyloid Copathology11
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPDD Without Amyloid Copathology8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPDD With Amyloid Copathology3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDLB Without Amyloid Copathology3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDLB With Amyloid Copathology0

Adverse events104

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersDLB Without Amyloid Copathology010
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersDLB With Amyloid Copathology111
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersPDD Without Amyloid Copathology010
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersPDD With Amyloid Copathology03
otherSupraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disordersDLB Without Amyloid Copathology010
otherSupraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disordersDLB With Amyloid Copathology111
otherSupraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disordersPDD Without Amyloid Copathology010
otherSupraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disordersPDD With Amyloid Copathology03
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersDLB Without Amyloid Copathology010
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersDLB With Amyloid Copathology011

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDLB Without Amyloid Copathology110
Total, all-cause mortalityDLB With Amyloid Copathology011
Total, all-cause mortalityPDD Without Amyloid Copathology010
Total, all-cause mortalityPDD With Amyloid Copathology03
Total, other adverse eventsDLB Without Amyloid Copathology510
Total, other adverse eventsDLB With Amyloid Copathology411
Total, other adverse eventsPDD Without Amyloid Copathology310
Total, other adverse eventsPDD With Amyloid Copathology23
Total, serious adverse eventsDLB Without Amyloid Copathology110
Total, serious adverse eventsDLB With Amyloid Copathology011

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04764669

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04764669/results?page=2