ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04807101

Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy

NCT04807101, Early phase 1, Completed, Greg S Cohen MD LLC; results first posted 2024-04-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy. Trials, record NCT04807101. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04807101

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy
NCT number
NCT04807101
Status
Completed
Phases
Early phase 1
Enrollment
300 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Greg S Cohen MD LLC
Conditions
Anesthesia, Endoscopy, Colonoscopy, Conscious Sedation
Interventions
midazolam alone
First posted
2021-03-19
Last updated
2024-04-15
Results first posted
2024-04-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPain Felt During the Procedure1 day
Level of discomfort during the procedure as assessed by the previously validated PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) questionnaire \[Leffler, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):194-203\]. The patient will answer the question "How much discomfort did you experience during the procedure?" A visual analog scale will be used ranging from 0 to 10 with higher numbers indicating more pain.
PrimaryAdequacy of Sedation1 day
Adequacy of sedation as assessed by the previously validated PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) questionnaire \[Leffler, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):194-203\]. The patient will answer the question "If having this procedure again in the future, how much sedation would you prefer to have?" A visual analog scale will be used ranging from -5 to 5, with lower numbers indicating a preference for less sedation in the future and higher numbers indicating a preference for more sedation in the future.
SecondaryPatient Reported Nausea1 dayPatient reported nausea as assessed by a yes or no answer to the question "Do you have any nausea now?"
SecondaryAdverse Events1 dayOxygen desaturation, hypotension, or any other event requiring the procedure to be interrupted
SecondaryCecal Intubation Ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearcecal intubation rate for the 2 arms of the study will be assessed by retrospective chart review
SecondaryCecal Intubation Timethrough study completion, an average of 1 yeartime to reach the cecum for the 2 arms of the study will be assessed by retrospective chart review
SecondaryColonoscopy Withdrawal Timethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearColonoscopy withdrawal time for the 2 arms of the study will be assessed by retrospective chart review
SecondaryAdenoma Detection Ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAdenoma detection rate for the 2 arms of the study will be assessed by retrospective chart review

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPain Felt During the Procedure1 dayscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYAdequacy of Sedation1 dayscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPatient Reported Nausea1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAdverse Events1 dayParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCecal Intubation Ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCecal Intubation Timethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearminutesMEAN
SECONDARYColonoscopy Withdrawal Timethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearminutesMEAN
SECONDARYAdenoma Detection Ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pain Felt During the ProcedureMidazolam and Fentanyl0.29Standard Deviation 1.2score on a scale
Pain Felt During the ProcedureMidazolam Alone0.30Standard Deviation 1.1score on a scale
Adequacy of SedationMidazolam and Fentanyl-0.28Standard Deviation 0.94score on a scale
Adequacy of SedationMidazolam Alone-0.094Standard Deviation 0.78score on a scale
Patient Reported NauseaMidazolam and Fentanyl1Participants
Patient Reported NauseaMidazolam Alone1Participants
Adverse EventsMidazolam and Fentanyl1Participants
Adverse EventsMidazolam Alone2Participants
Cecal Intubation RateMidazolam and Fentanyl152Participants
Cecal Intubation RateMidazolam Alone148Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMidazolam and Fentanyl152
Overall StudySTARTEDMidazolam Alone148
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMidazolam and Fentanyl152
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMidazolam Alone148
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMidazolam and Fentanyl0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMidazolam Alone0

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherprocedure interrupted due to painGeneral disordersMidazolam and Fentanyl11521
otherprocedure interrupted due to painGeneral disordersMidazolam Alone21482

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMidazolam and Fentanyl0152
Total, all-cause mortalityMidazolam Alone0148
Total, other adverse eventsMidazolam and Fentanyl1152
Total, other adverse eventsMidazolam Alone2148
Total, serious adverse eventsMidazolam and Fentanyl0152
Total, serious adverse eventsMidazolam Alone0148

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Midazolam and Fentanyl vs Midazolam Alone: Patient Reported NauseaTrial comparisons
Midazolam and Fentanyl vs Midazolam Alone: Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Midazolam and Fentanyl vs Midazolam Alone: Cecal Intubation RateTrial comparisons
Midazolam and Fentanyl vs Midazolam Alone: Adenoma Detection RateTrial comparisons
Midazolam and Fentanyl vs Midazolam Alone: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Midazolam and Fentanyl vs Midazolam Alone: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04807101

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04807101/registered