ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04817332

Registered outcomes30

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryComparison of Participant Clinical Status Between Treatment ArmsUp to 29 days
To determine the participant clinical status on a 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome: 1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities 2. Not hospitalised, limitation on activities; 3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 7. Death.
SecondaryImprovement of One Category From Admission Using 7-point Ordinal Scale.Day 29
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome: 1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities 2. Not hospitalised, limitations on activities 3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen 4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen 5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices 6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 7. Death
SecondaryParticipant Clinical Status on 7-point Ordinal ScaleDay 15
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome: 1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities 2. Not hospitalised, limitations on activities 3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen 4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen 5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices 6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 7. Death
SecondaryMean Change in the 7-point Ordinal ScaleBaseline to days 3, 5, 8, 11 and 29
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome: 1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities 2. Not hospitalised, limitations on activities 3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen 4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen 5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices 6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 7. Death
SecondaryNumber of Participants Discharged or to a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of Equal or Less Than 2 and Maintained for 24 Hours, Whichever Occurs First.Up to 29 days
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: National Early Warning Score (NEWS). NEWS is a system that scores 6 physiological parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new-onset confusion, temperature) to give an aggerate score. Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 20.. Higher scores indicate worsening clinical outcomes.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of National Early Warning Score (NEWS).Baseline to day 15
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: National Early Warning Score. NEWS is a system that scores 6 physiological parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new-onset confusion, temperature) to give an aggerate score. Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 20.. Higher scores indicate worsening clinical outcomes.
SecondaryNumber of Oxygen Therapy Free Days1-29 daysEvaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: oxygenation
SecondaryIncidence and Duration of New Oxygen Therapy Use During the Trial0-29 daysEvaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: oxygenation
SecondaryNumber of Mechanical Ventilator Free Days1-29 daysEvaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: Mechanical ventilation
SecondaryIncidence and Duration of New Mechanical Ventilation Use During the Trial.1-29 daysEvaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: Mechanical ventilation
SecondaryDuration of Hospitalisation (Days).Duration between date of admission and discharge assessed up to 29 days.Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: hospitalisation
Secondary28-day MortalityDay 1 to 29
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: mortality. Survival analysis was used to compare 28-day mortality between the treatment arms. Participants who did not die were censored on the last study day. Those who withdrew or were loss to follow-up and their day 29 status was unknown were censored at the date of loss to follow-up/withdrawal. Other participants were censored 28 days from randomisation in study time.
SecondaryCumulative Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1-29 daysEvaluation of the safety of the intervention through 29 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryDiscontinuation or Temporary Suspension of Treatment1-29 daysEvaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryChanges in White Cell Count (x10^9/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)Day 29Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryChanges in Haemoglobin (g/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)Day 29Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryChanges in Platelets (x10^9/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)Day 29Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryChanges in Creatinine (Umol/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)Day 29Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryChanges in Total Bilirubin (Umol/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)Day 29Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm
SecondaryChanges in Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)Day 29Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04817332/registered